内心的朋友?植入式心律转复除颤器在挽救生命和长期损害生命之间

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropology & Medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/13648470.2022.2041548
F. Barlocco
{"title":"内心的朋友?植入式心律转复除颤器在挽救生命和长期损害生命之间","authors":"F. Barlocco","doi":"10.1080/13648470.2022.2041548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article considers the way in which a medical technology, the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), by preventing fatal outcomes, in this case sudden death, deriving from cardiac diseases, and specifically hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, contributes to the development of a particular type of chronicity. While biomedicine celebrates technological advances in treatments and naturalises chronicity, focussing on life expectancy as a victory over the ‘acute’ aspects of the disease, the way in which patients live with the disease is left unquestioned. The article follows Smith-Morris’s (2010) perspective in seeing chronicity as the never-ending process of identifying with one’s disease, adding a focus on the role played by an embodied technology in relation to it. Based on participant observation in a clinical setting and interviews with clinicians, the article interrogates three key themes in the chronicity of cardiac patients implanted with an ICD: risk, quality of life and choice. The data shows a constant tension between managing a one-off potentially fatal ‘acute’ risk and life with serious disruptions due to the limitations imposed by the implanted device. The article argues that patients’ resources for facing the life and identity disrupted by the disease are limited by ideas of what living a diseased body is, which acritically follow discourses of ‘patient choice’ and a ‘technological imperative’ to avoid risk.","PeriodicalId":8240,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology & Medicine","volume":"29 1","pages":"61 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The friend within? The implantable cardioverter defibrillator between saving lives and chronically impairing them\",\"authors\":\"F. Barlocco\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13648470.2022.2041548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article considers the way in which a medical technology, the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), by preventing fatal outcomes, in this case sudden death, deriving from cardiac diseases, and specifically hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, contributes to the development of a particular type of chronicity. While biomedicine celebrates technological advances in treatments and naturalises chronicity, focussing on life expectancy as a victory over the ‘acute’ aspects of the disease, the way in which patients live with the disease is left unquestioned. The article follows Smith-Morris’s (2010) perspective in seeing chronicity as the never-ending process of identifying with one’s disease, adding a focus on the role played by an embodied technology in relation to it. Based on participant observation in a clinical setting and interviews with clinicians, the article interrogates three key themes in the chronicity of cardiac patients implanted with an ICD: risk, quality of life and choice. The data shows a constant tension between managing a one-off potentially fatal ‘acute’ risk and life with serious disruptions due to the limitations imposed by the implanted device. The article argues that patients’ resources for facing the life and identity disrupted by the disease are limited by ideas of what living a diseased body is, which acritically follow discourses of ‘patient choice’ and a ‘technological imperative’ to avoid risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropology & Medicine\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"61 - 75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropology & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2022.2041548\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2022.2041548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文考虑了一种医疗技术,即植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD),通过预防致命的结果,在这种情况下猝死,源自心脏疾病,特别是肥厚性心肌病,有助于发展特定类型的慢性。虽然生物医学庆祝治疗方面的技术进步,并将慢性病归化,把重点放在预期寿命上,认为这是对这种疾病“急性”方面的胜利,但患者的生活方式却没有受到质疑。这篇文章遵循了Smith-Morris(2010)的观点,将慢性病视为一个人对疾病永无止境的认同过程,并将重点放在了与疾病相关的具体化技术所起的作用上。基于临床环境中的参与者观察和与临床医生的访谈,本文探讨了植入ICD的心脏病患者慢性性的三个关键主题:风险、生活质量和选择。数据显示,由于植入设备的限制,管理一次性潜在致命的“急性”风险和生命严重中断之间存在持续的紧张关系。这篇文章认为,病人面对被疾病打乱的生活和身份的资源,受到了关于如何活在一个患病的身体上的观念的限制,这些观念尖锐地遵循了“病人选择”和避免风险的“技术要求”的话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The friend within? The implantable cardioverter defibrillator between saving lives and chronically impairing them
Abstract This article considers the way in which a medical technology, the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), by preventing fatal outcomes, in this case sudden death, deriving from cardiac diseases, and specifically hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, contributes to the development of a particular type of chronicity. While biomedicine celebrates technological advances in treatments and naturalises chronicity, focussing on life expectancy as a victory over the ‘acute’ aspects of the disease, the way in which patients live with the disease is left unquestioned. The article follows Smith-Morris’s (2010) perspective in seeing chronicity as the never-ending process of identifying with one’s disease, adding a focus on the role played by an embodied technology in relation to it. Based on participant observation in a clinical setting and interviews with clinicians, the article interrogates three key themes in the chronicity of cardiac patients implanted with an ICD: risk, quality of life and choice. The data shows a constant tension between managing a one-off potentially fatal ‘acute’ risk and life with serious disruptions due to the limitations imposed by the implanted device. The article argues that patients’ resources for facing the life and identity disrupted by the disease are limited by ideas of what living a diseased body is, which acritically follow discourses of ‘patient choice’ and a ‘technological imperative’ to avoid risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
(In) visibility of health and illness: Instagram as an unregulated public health platform. 'We are not done': reclaiming care after mobile health in Burkina Faso. Digital technologies and the future of health: aspirations, care and data. Phantom data and the potentials of radical caretaking in reproductive health. The insensitivity of 'sensitive care': the bureaucracy of pregnancy tissue disposal in England, UK.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1