基于软计算技术的岩体偏心荷载基础承载力研究

Q1 Mathematics Engineered Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.30919/es929
Divesh Kumar, P. Samui, Warit Wipulanusat, S. Keawsawasvong, Kongtawan Sangjinda, Wittaya Jitchaijaroen
{"title":"基于软计算技术的岩体偏心荷载基础承载力研究","authors":"Divesh Kumar, P. Samui, Warit Wipulanusat, S. Keawsawasvong, Kongtawan Sangjinda, Wittaya Jitchaijaroen","doi":"10.30919/es929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A crucial characteristic of real-world engineering operations is a strip footing's bearing capacity on a rock mass subjected to incline and eccentric loading conditions. Many scientists have attempted to establish and implement artificial intelligence (AI) models for estimating strip footings’ bearing capacity. In this study, four data-driven models, namely, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), deep neural network (DNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM), are developed and compared to calculate the strip footing's bearing capacity. The strip footing's bearing capacity is obtained numerically by performing a lower bound (LB) and upper bound (UB) finite element limit analysis (FELA) for the purpose of training machine learning models. A total of 5120 FELA solutions with six dimensionless input parameters, namely, the geological strength index ( GSI ), the yield parameter ( m i ), the dimensionless strength ( 𝛾 B/ 𝜎 ci ) , inclination angle ( 𝛽 ), the dimensionless eccentricity ( e/B ), and the adhesion factor ( a ), and one output parameter, the bearing capacity factor ( P/ 𝜎 ci B ), were utilized in the analysis. The results show that the efficiency of all the proposed models is sufficient for bearing capacity factor determination, with coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) values ranging from 0.87 to 0.997 in the training phase and 0.975 to 0.999 in the testing phase. The proposed XGBoost model outperforms other models, such as RF, DNN, and LSTM, and can be used accurately for estimating a strip footing's bearing capacity on rock mass subjected to incline and eccentric loading loads.","PeriodicalId":36059,"journal":{"name":"Engineered Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bearing Capacity of Eccentrically Loaded Footings on Rock Masses Using Soft Computing Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Divesh Kumar, P. Samui, Warit Wipulanusat, S. Keawsawasvong, Kongtawan Sangjinda, Wittaya Jitchaijaroen\",\"doi\":\"10.30919/es929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A crucial characteristic of real-world engineering operations is a strip footing's bearing capacity on a rock mass subjected to incline and eccentric loading conditions. Many scientists have attempted to establish and implement artificial intelligence (AI) models for estimating strip footings’ bearing capacity. In this study, four data-driven models, namely, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), deep neural network (DNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM), are developed and compared to calculate the strip footing's bearing capacity. The strip footing's bearing capacity is obtained numerically by performing a lower bound (LB) and upper bound (UB) finite element limit analysis (FELA) for the purpose of training machine learning models. A total of 5120 FELA solutions with six dimensionless input parameters, namely, the geological strength index ( GSI ), the yield parameter ( m i ), the dimensionless strength ( 𝛾 B/ 𝜎 ci ) , inclination angle ( 𝛽 ), the dimensionless eccentricity ( e/B ), and the adhesion factor ( a ), and one output parameter, the bearing capacity factor ( P/ 𝜎 ci B ), were utilized in the analysis. The results show that the efficiency of all the proposed models is sufficient for bearing capacity factor determination, with coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) values ranging from 0.87 to 0.997 in the training phase and 0.975 to 0.999 in the testing phase. The proposed XGBoost model outperforms other models, such as RF, DNN, and LSTM, and can be used accurately for estimating a strip footing's bearing capacity on rock mass subjected to incline and eccentric loading loads.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineered Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineered Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30919/es929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineered Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30919/es929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在实际工程操作中,条形基础在倾斜和偏心荷载条件下的承载能力是一个重要的特征。许多科学家试图建立和实现人工智能(AI)模型来估计条形基础的承载力。本文采用极端梯度增强(XGBoost)、随机森林(RF)、深度神经网络(DNN)和长短期记忆(LSTM)四种数据驱动模型进行了条形基础承载力计算,并进行了对比。通过进行下限(LB)和上限(UB)有限元极限分析(FELA),对条形基础的承载力进行数值计算,以训练机器学习模型。采用6个无量纲输入参数(地质强度指数(GSI)、屈服参数(mi)、强度( B/ ci)、倾斜角()、离心率(e/)、黏附系数(A))和1个输出参数(承载系数(P/ ci B))共5120个FELA方案进行分析。结果表明,所有模型的效率都足以确定承载力系数,训练阶段的决定系数(r2)值在0.87 ~ 0.997之间,测试阶段的决定系数(r2)值在0.975 ~ 0.999之间。所提出的XGBoost模型优于RF、DNN和LSTM等其他模型,可以准确地用于估计倾斜和偏心荷载作用下岩体条形基础的承载能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bearing Capacity of Eccentrically Loaded Footings on Rock Masses Using Soft Computing Techniques
A crucial characteristic of real-world engineering operations is a strip footing's bearing capacity on a rock mass subjected to incline and eccentric loading conditions. Many scientists have attempted to establish and implement artificial intelligence (AI) models for estimating strip footings’ bearing capacity. In this study, four data-driven models, namely, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), deep neural network (DNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM), are developed and compared to calculate the strip footing's bearing capacity. The strip footing's bearing capacity is obtained numerically by performing a lower bound (LB) and upper bound (UB) finite element limit analysis (FELA) for the purpose of training machine learning models. A total of 5120 FELA solutions with six dimensionless input parameters, namely, the geological strength index ( GSI ), the yield parameter ( m i ), the dimensionless strength ( 𝛾 B/ 𝜎 ci ) , inclination angle ( 𝛽 ), the dimensionless eccentricity ( e/B ), and the adhesion factor ( a ), and one output parameter, the bearing capacity factor ( P/ 𝜎 ci B ), were utilized in the analysis. The results show that the efficiency of all the proposed models is sufficient for bearing capacity factor determination, with coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) values ranging from 0.87 to 0.997 in the training phase and 0.975 to 0.999 in the testing phase. The proposed XGBoost model outperforms other models, such as RF, DNN, and LSTM, and can be used accurately for estimating a strip footing's bearing capacity on rock mass subjected to incline and eccentric loading loads.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineered Science
Engineered Science Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
14.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
期刊最新文献
Thermal Performance Improvement of Forced-Air Cooling System Combined with Liquid Spray for Densely Packed Batteries of Electric Vehicle Iron-based soft magnetic materials fabricated by laser additive manufacturing Physico-Chemical Characteristics Natural Mud of Salt Lakes of North-East Kazakhstan Research Network Analysis and Machine Learning on Heusler Alloys Exploring Point Defects in Rb2O via First-Principles Calculations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1