再谈池化和估值

H. Assa
{"title":"再谈池化和估值","authors":"H. Assa","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3880095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concerning the economic losses associated with the COVID-19 outbreak and other recent large catastrophes, and given that in a connected world the economic losses have a larger impact, we aim to revisit the fundamental insurance paradigms, in particular, pooling and valuation in the presence of systematic risk. We consider a pool of policyholders whose losses can be widely correlated through common shock. We have observed that from a mathematical standpoint, insurance as a pooling approach can manage the risk if the principle of insurance (POI), that is to keep the systematic risk secure, holds. Our study suggests that valuation cannot be independent of the risk pool, and the premium needs to be adjusted according to the systematic safety loading. This also motivates the introduction of ex-post policies that can vanish the systematic safety loading by introducing contingent premiums. In addition, we look at the upper bounds for the pool valuation when the pool is influenced by a common shock. In the end, we make an assessment of our theory with two examples, first the UK Coronavirus job retention case and second catastrophe events in the agricultural sector. This way we propose a novel way to analyze events with large economic losses.","PeriodicalId":13563,"journal":{"name":"Insurance & Financing in Health Economics eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pooling and Valuation Revisited\",\"authors\":\"H. Assa\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3880095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Concerning the economic losses associated with the COVID-19 outbreak and other recent large catastrophes, and given that in a connected world the economic losses have a larger impact, we aim to revisit the fundamental insurance paradigms, in particular, pooling and valuation in the presence of systematic risk. We consider a pool of policyholders whose losses can be widely correlated through common shock. We have observed that from a mathematical standpoint, insurance as a pooling approach can manage the risk if the principle of insurance (POI), that is to keep the systematic risk secure, holds. Our study suggests that valuation cannot be independent of the risk pool, and the premium needs to be adjusted according to the systematic safety loading. This also motivates the introduction of ex-post policies that can vanish the systematic safety loading by introducing contingent premiums. In addition, we look at the upper bounds for the pool valuation when the pool is influenced by a common shock. In the end, we make an assessment of our theory with two examples, first the UK Coronavirus job retention case and second catastrophe events in the agricultural sector. This way we propose a novel way to analyze events with large economic losses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insurance & Financing in Health Economics eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insurance & Financing in Health Economics eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3880095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insurance & Financing in Health Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3880095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于与新冠肺炎疫情和近期其他重大灾难相关的经济损失,鉴于在一个相互关联的世界中,经济损失的影响更大,我们的目标是重新审视基本的保险范式,特别是在存在系统性风险的情况下进行集中和估值。我们考虑一群投保人,他们的损失可以通过共同冲击广泛关联。我们已经观察到,从数学的角度来看,如果保险原则(POI),即保持系统风险的安全,保险作为一种汇集方法可以管理风险。我们的研究表明,估值不能独立于风险池,溢价需要根据系统安全负荷进行调整。这也促使引入事后政策,通过引入或有保费来消除系统性安全负荷。此外,我们还研究了当池受到共同冲击影响时池估值的上界。最后,我们用两个例子对我们的理论进行了评估,一个是英国冠状病毒就业保留案例,另一个是农业部门的灾难事件。通过这种方法,我们提出了一种新的方法来分析具有重大经济损失的事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pooling and Valuation Revisited
Concerning the economic losses associated with the COVID-19 outbreak and other recent large catastrophes, and given that in a connected world the economic losses have a larger impact, we aim to revisit the fundamental insurance paradigms, in particular, pooling and valuation in the presence of systematic risk. We consider a pool of policyholders whose losses can be widely correlated through common shock. We have observed that from a mathematical standpoint, insurance as a pooling approach can manage the risk if the principle of insurance (POI), that is to keep the systematic risk secure, holds. Our study suggests that valuation cannot be independent of the risk pool, and the premium needs to be adjusted according to the systematic safety loading. This also motivates the introduction of ex-post policies that can vanish the systematic safety loading by introducing contingent premiums. In addition, we look at the upper bounds for the pool valuation when the pool is influenced by a common shock. In the end, we make an assessment of our theory with two examples, first the UK Coronavirus job retention case and second catastrophe events in the agricultural sector. This way we propose a novel way to analyze events with large economic losses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Plugging Gaps in Payment Systems: Evidence from the Take-Up of New Medicare Billing Codes Speed Limit Enforcement and Road Safety COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates and Vaccine Uptake Ministers Engage in Favoritism Too Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Households and Workers in Oregon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1