《肉说教:畜牧业和否认的修辞》,作者:杰森·汉南(Jason Hannan)

Steven McMullen
{"title":"《肉说教:畜牧业和否认的修辞》,作者:杰森·汉南(Jason Hannan)","authors":"Steven McMullen","doi":"10.5406/21601267.13.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"fully meaningful only to it” (p. 195). In “The Stock Image,” Traisnel also touches upon Kantian philosophy, stating that we become aware of “the finitude of our sensorial faculties”—thus we cannot bridge any distance by “capturing” really anything (p. 157). In a heartbreaking finale, Traisnel makes this point frightenedly clear in that the capture regime leads to extinction. He recounts the heartbreaking fate of passenger pigeons in the sole survivor of Martha as the tragic result of biopower. Seen only through the lens of reproducibility, Martha remained infertile unto her death despite the best practices by conservationists. Understanding that we saw Martha as an object rather than as a subject who “sees” means that we, too, can only see her from our “milieu” as well. As a result, we can never really understand her infertility. Traisnel’s point to acknowledge animals at a distance is integral to a new ethics of care, and he is clear about what it should not look like. What it could like is left to the reader to ponder.","PeriodicalId":73601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","volume":"31 1","pages":"91 - 93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meatsplaining: The Animal Agriculture Industry and the Rhetoric of Denial ed. by Jason Hannan (review)\",\"authors\":\"Steven McMullen\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/21601267.13.1.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"fully meaningful only to it” (p. 195). In “The Stock Image,” Traisnel also touches upon Kantian philosophy, stating that we become aware of “the finitude of our sensorial faculties”—thus we cannot bridge any distance by “capturing” really anything (p. 157). In a heartbreaking finale, Traisnel makes this point frightenedly clear in that the capture regime leads to extinction. He recounts the heartbreaking fate of passenger pigeons in the sole survivor of Martha as the tragic result of biopower. Seen only through the lens of reproducibility, Martha remained infertile unto her death despite the best practices by conservationists. Understanding that we saw Martha as an object rather than as a subject who “sees” means that we, too, can only see her from our “milieu” as well. As a result, we can never really understand her infertility. Traisnel’s point to acknowledge animals at a distance is integral to a new ethics of care, and he is clear about what it should not look like. What it could like is left to the reader to ponder.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied animal ethics research\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"91 - 93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied animal ethics research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.13.1.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/21601267.13.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

只有对它才完全有意义”(第195页)。在《存量影像》中,Traisnel也提到了康德哲学,他说我们意识到“我们感官能力的有限性”——因此我们不能通过“捕捉”任何东西来跨越任何距离(第157页)。在一个令人心碎的结局中,Traisnel把这一点说得非常清楚,因为捕获制度导致了灭绝。他讲述了玛莎唯一幸存者旅鸽令人心碎的命运,这是生物能源的悲惨结果。仅从可繁殖性的角度来看,尽管环保主义者采取了最好的做法,玛莎直到死都没有生育能力。我们把玛莎看作是一个客体,而不是一个“看”的主体,这意味着我们也只能从我们的“环境”中看到她。因此,我们永远无法真正理解她的不孕症。Traisnel的观点是,在一定距离内承认动物是一种新的关怀伦理的组成部分,他清楚地知道它不应该是什么样子。它会是什么样子留给读者去思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meatsplaining: The Animal Agriculture Industry and the Rhetoric of Denial ed. by Jason Hannan (review)
fully meaningful only to it” (p. 195). In “The Stock Image,” Traisnel also touches upon Kantian philosophy, stating that we become aware of “the finitude of our sensorial faculties”—thus we cannot bridge any distance by “capturing” really anything (p. 157). In a heartbreaking finale, Traisnel makes this point frightenedly clear in that the capture regime leads to extinction. He recounts the heartbreaking fate of passenger pigeons in the sole survivor of Martha as the tragic result of biopower. Seen only through the lens of reproducibility, Martha remained infertile unto her death despite the best practices by conservationists. Understanding that we saw Martha as an object rather than as a subject who “sees” means that we, too, can only see her from our “milieu” as well. As a result, we can never really understand her infertility. Traisnel’s point to acknowledge animals at a distance is integral to a new ethics of care, and he is clear about what it should not look like. What it could like is left to the reader to ponder.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phenomenology and Critical Hermeneutics of the “Livestock” Industry and Associated Sanctuaries Neglected Tropical Diseases and Long-Term Captive Animals: Ethical Considerations with Venom Lab Snakes Quality Management and Animal Welfare as Culture of Care for Animal Experiments under Biosafety Level-3, taking COVID-19 as a Practical Example Rejecting an Additive Solution to Regan’s Lifeboat Case Zoonoses in Unconventional Companion Animals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1