Tarski语义的保守内延

Z. Majkic
{"title":"Tarski语义的保守内延","authors":"Z. Majkic","doi":"10.1155/2013/920157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We considered an extension of the first-order logic (FOL) by Bealer's intensional abstraction operator. Contemporary use of the term \"intension\" derives from the traditional logical Frege-Russell doctrine that an idea (logic formula) has both an extension and an intension. Although there is divergence in formulation, it is accepted that the \"extension\" of an idea consists of the subjects to which the idea applies, and the \"intension\" consists of the attributes implied by the idea. From the Montague's point of view, the meaning of an idea can be considered as particular extensions in different possible worlds. In the case of standard FOL, we obtain a commutative homomorphic diagram, which is valid in each given possible world of an intensional FOL: from a free algebra of the FOL syntax, into its intensional algebra of concepts, and, successively, into an extensional relational algebra (different from Cylindric algebras). Then we show that this composition corresponds to the Tarski's interpretation of the standard extensional FOL in this possible world.","PeriodicalId":7253,"journal":{"name":"Adv. Artif. Intell.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conservative Intensional Extension of Tarski's Semantics\",\"authors\":\"Z. Majkic\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2013/920157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We considered an extension of the first-order logic (FOL) by Bealer's intensional abstraction operator. Contemporary use of the term \\\"intension\\\" derives from the traditional logical Frege-Russell doctrine that an idea (logic formula) has both an extension and an intension. Although there is divergence in formulation, it is accepted that the \\\"extension\\\" of an idea consists of the subjects to which the idea applies, and the \\\"intension\\\" consists of the attributes implied by the idea. From the Montague's point of view, the meaning of an idea can be considered as particular extensions in different possible worlds. In the case of standard FOL, we obtain a commutative homomorphic diagram, which is valid in each given possible world of an intensional FOL: from a free algebra of the FOL syntax, into its intensional algebra of concepts, and, successively, into an extensional relational algebra (different from Cylindric algebras). Then we show that this composition corresponds to the Tarski's interpretation of the standard extensional FOL in this possible world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adv. Artif. Intell.\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adv. Artif. Intell.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/920157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adv. Artif. Intell.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/920157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

我们考虑了一阶逻辑(FOL)由Bealer的内涵抽象算子的扩展。当代对“内涵”一词的使用源于传统的逻辑弗雷格-罗素学说,即一个观念(逻辑公式)既具有外延,又具有内涵。尽管在表述上存在分歧,但人们普遍认为,一个概念的“外延”由该概念所适用的主体组成,而“内涵”由该概念所隐含的属性组成。从蒙太古的观点来看,一个观念的意义可以被看作是在不同可能世界中的特定延伸。在标准FOL的情况下,我们得到了一个交换同态图,它在每个给定的可能世界中都是有效的:从FOL语法的自由代数,到它的概念的内涵代数,然后依次到扩展关系代数(不同于圆柱代数)。然后,我们证明了这种组合符合塔斯基对这个可能世界中标准外延FOL的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conservative Intensional Extension of Tarski's Semantics
We considered an extension of the first-order logic (FOL) by Bealer's intensional abstraction operator. Contemporary use of the term "intension" derives from the traditional logical Frege-Russell doctrine that an idea (logic formula) has both an extension and an intension. Although there is divergence in formulation, it is accepted that the "extension" of an idea consists of the subjects to which the idea applies, and the "intension" consists of the attributes implied by the idea. From the Montague's point of view, the meaning of an idea can be considered as particular extensions in different possible worlds. In the case of standard FOL, we obtain a commutative homomorphic diagram, which is valid in each given possible world of an intensional FOL: from a free algebra of the FOL syntax, into its intensional algebra of concepts, and, successively, into an extensional relational algebra (different from Cylindric algebras). Then we show that this composition corresponds to the Tarski's interpretation of the standard extensional FOL in this possible world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
iWordNet: A New Approach to Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence Natural Language Processing and Fuzzy Tools for Business Processes in a Geolocation Context Method for Solving LASSO Problem Based on Multidimensional Weight Selection and Configuration of Sorption Isotherm Models in Soils Using Artificial Bees Guided by the Particle Swarm Weighted Constraint Satisfaction for Smart Home Automation and Optimization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1