Pari Passu谬论——《安魂曲》(La Falacia Pari - Passu)

IF 0.6 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW American Bankruptcy Law Journal Pub Date : 2018-01-24 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3108862
L. Buchheit
{"title":"Pari Passu谬论——《安魂曲》(La Falacia Pari - Passu)","authors":"L. Buchheit","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3108862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"English Abstract: The pari passu fallacy, first uncloaked in 2000, holds that when a sovereign borrower promises to maintain the equal ranking of a debt with the borrower's other senior indebtedness, it thereby implicitly promises to pay all of those debts on a ratable basis. In its 18-year life span, the fallacy caused considerable mischief in the sovereign debt market. Recent decisions of the US federal courts in New York have clarified the circumstances in which a sovereign borrower will be held to breach, and just as importantly when it will be held not to breach, a contractual pari passu undertaking. \nSpanish Abstract: La falacia pari passu fue esgrimida por vez primera en el ano 2000. Segun esta falacia, cuando un deudor soberano promete mantener una deuda en igualdad de condiciones que sus otras deudas preferentes, implicitamente promete que pagara todas sus deudas de forma prorrateada. Durante su larga vigencia de 18 anos, esta falacia ha causado problemas considerables en los mercados de deuda soberana. Sin embargo, decisiones recientes de los tribunales federales norteamericanos con jurisdiccion en Nueva York han aclarado las circunstancias segun las cuales se considerara que un deudor soberano ha incumplido e, igualmente importante, cuando se considera que no ha incumplido la obligacion contractual pari passu.","PeriodicalId":44862,"journal":{"name":"American Bankruptcy Law Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Pari Passu Fallacy -- Requiescat in Pace (La Falacia pari-passu -- Descanse en paz)\",\"authors\":\"L. Buchheit\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3108862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"English Abstract: The pari passu fallacy, first uncloaked in 2000, holds that when a sovereign borrower promises to maintain the equal ranking of a debt with the borrower's other senior indebtedness, it thereby implicitly promises to pay all of those debts on a ratable basis. In its 18-year life span, the fallacy caused considerable mischief in the sovereign debt market. Recent decisions of the US federal courts in New York have clarified the circumstances in which a sovereign borrower will be held to breach, and just as importantly when it will be held not to breach, a contractual pari passu undertaking. \\nSpanish Abstract: La falacia pari passu fue esgrimida por vez primera en el ano 2000. Segun esta falacia, cuando un deudor soberano promete mantener una deuda en igualdad de condiciones que sus otras deudas preferentes, implicitamente promete que pagara todas sus deudas de forma prorrateada. Durante su larga vigencia de 18 anos, esta falacia ha causado problemas considerables en los mercados de deuda soberana. Sin embargo, decisiones recientes de los tribunales federales norteamericanos con jurisdiccion en Nueva York han aclarado las circunstancias segun las cuales se considerara que un deudor soberano ha incumplido e, igualmente importante, cuando se considera que no ha incumplido la obligacion contractual pari passu.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Bankruptcy Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Bankruptcy Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3108862\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Bankruptcy Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3108862","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:同等权益谬论于2000年首次被发现,该谬论认为,当主权借款人承诺将某项债务与其他优先债务保持同等的排名时,它就隐含地承诺将按税率支付所有这些债务。这一谬论在其18年的历史中,给主权债务市场造成了相当大的破坏。美国纽约联邦法院最近的判决,澄清了主权借款人在何种情况下会被判违约,以及同样重要的是,在何种情况下会被判不违约。摘要/ Abstract摘要:2000年1月1日,黄豆病(La falacia pari passu fuu esgrimida porvez primera)发生。第2条规定:依照法律规定,依照法律规定,依照法律规定,依照法律规定,依照法律规定,依照法律规定,依照法律规定,依照法律规定,依照法律规定。Durante su larga vigencia de 18 anos, esta falacia, causado问题是相当可观的在许多mercados de deuda soberana。在禁运情况下,北美联邦法庭对新纽约的管辖权作出的决定,与对新纽约的管辖权的决定相比,对新纽约的管辖权的决定比对新纽约的管辖权的决定更重要,对新纽约的管辖权的决定更重要,对新纽约的管辖权的决定更重要,对新纽约的管辖权的决定更重要,对新纽约的管辖权的决定比对新纽约的管辖权的决定更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Pari Passu Fallacy -- Requiescat in Pace (La Falacia pari-passu -- Descanse en paz)
English Abstract: The pari passu fallacy, first uncloaked in 2000, holds that when a sovereign borrower promises to maintain the equal ranking of a debt with the borrower's other senior indebtedness, it thereby implicitly promises to pay all of those debts on a ratable basis. In its 18-year life span, the fallacy caused considerable mischief in the sovereign debt market. Recent decisions of the US federal courts in New York have clarified the circumstances in which a sovereign borrower will be held to breach, and just as importantly when it will be held not to breach, a contractual pari passu undertaking. Spanish Abstract: La falacia pari passu fue esgrimida por vez primera en el ano 2000. Segun esta falacia, cuando un deudor soberano promete mantener una deuda en igualdad de condiciones que sus otras deudas preferentes, implicitamente promete que pagara todas sus deudas de forma prorrateada. Durante su larga vigencia de 18 anos, esta falacia ha causado problemas considerables en los mercados de deuda soberana. Sin embargo, decisiones recientes de los tribunales federales norteamericanos con jurisdiccion en Nueva York han aclarado las circunstancias segun las cuales se considerara que un deudor soberano ha incumplido e, igualmente importante, cuando se considera que no ha incumplido la obligacion contractual pari passu.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Steering Loan Modifications Post-Pandemic Passing the Parcel? Relationship Banking at the Onset of Financial Distress Treatment of Disputed Claims in Corporate Insolvency: Evolving Jurisprudence Paper Series VII - Arrangements and Compromise Government Activism in Bankruptcy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1