行动逻辑与资本主义模式:解释自下而上的非自由变革

Julien Etienne, Gerhard Schnyder
{"title":"行动逻辑与资本主义模式:解释自下而上的非自由变革","authors":"Julien Etienne, Gerhard Schnyder","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2185368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent institutionalist scholarship has theorized the liberalization or “disorganization” of capitalism as the result of shifts in economic actors' “logic of action” towards opportunism. Little attention has been given to the reverse possibility that shifts in economic actors' “logic of action” away from opportunism might contribute to “embedding” or “organizing” capitalism. This paper builds on recent scholarship to theorize this scenario and then demonstrate its empirical validity with an historical institutionalist study of the emergence of such a “non-liberal” institution in Switzerland in 1961. The theoretical framework links three “logics of action” – opportunism, enlightened self-interest and strong solidarity – to Hopner's typology of capitalist institutions – organized, coordinated, and liberal. It theorizes the interactions between these logics and the social mechanism – goal signaling – that can explain a shift from one logic of action to another, potentially leading to change from one type of institution to another.","PeriodicalId":70912,"journal":{"name":"政治经济学季刊","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Logics of Action and Models of Capitalism: Explaining Bottom-Up Non-Liberal Change\",\"authors\":\"Julien Etienne, Gerhard Schnyder\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2185368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent institutionalist scholarship has theorized the liberalization or “disorganization” of capitalism as the result of shifts in economic actors' “logic of action” towards opportunism. Little attention has been given to the reverse possibility that shifts in economic actors' “logic of action” away from opportunism might contribute to “embedding” or “organizing” capitalism. This paper builds on recent scholarship to theorize this scenario and then demonstrate its empirical validity with an historical institutionalist study of the emergence of such a “non-liberal” institution in Switzerland in 1961. The theoretical framework links three “logics of action” – opportunism, enlightened self-interest and strong solidarity – to Hopner's typology of capitalist institutions – organized, coordinated, and liberal. It theorizes the interactions between these logics and the social mechanism – goal signaling – that can explain a shift from one logic of action to another, potentially leading to change from one type of institution to another.\",\"PeriodicalId\":70912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"政治经济学季刊\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"政治经济学季刊\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2185368\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"政治经济学季刊","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2185368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

最近的制度主义学者将资本主义的自由化或“解体”理论化,认为这是经济参与者的“行动逻辑”向机会主义转变的结果。很少有人注意到相反的可能性,即经济参与者的“行动逻辑”从机会主义转向可能有助于“嵌入”或“组织”资本主义。本文以最近的学术研究为基础,将这一情景理论化,然后通过对1961年瑞士出现的这种“非自由”制度的历史制度主义研究来证明其经验有效性。理论框架将三种“行动逻辑”——机会主义、开明的自我利益和强大的团结——与霍普纳的资本主义制度类型——有组织的、协调的和自由的联系起来。它将这些逻辑和社会机制——目标信号——之间的相互作用理论化,这可以解释从一种行为逻辑到另一种行为逻辑的转变,并可能导致从一种类型的制度向另一种类型的制度的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Logics of Action and Models of Capitalism: Explaining Bottom-Up Non-Liberal Change
Recent institutionalist scholarship has theorized the liberalization or “disorganization” of capitalism as the result of shifts in economic actors' “logic of action” towards opportunism. Little attention has been given to the reverse possibility that shifts in economic actors' “logic of action” away from opportunism might contribute to “embedding” or “organizing” capitalism. This paper builds on recent scholarship to theorize this scenario and then demonstrate its empirical validity with an historical institutionalist study of the emergence of such a “non-liberal” institution in Switzerland in 1961. The theoretical framework links three “logics of action” – opportunism, enlightened self-interest and strong solidarity – to Hopner's typology of capitalist institutions – organized, coordinated, and liberal. It theorizes the interactions between these logics and the social mechanism – goal signaling – that can explain a shift from one logic of action to another, potentially leading to change from one type of institution to another.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
127
期刊最新文献
The Development of the Discipline of the History of Foreign Economic Thought in China: Based on the Investigation of the Chinese Society for the Foreign Economic Theories Building World-Class State-owned Enterprises —Connotation, Characteristics, Measurement, and Development Direction The Development Logic of Unbalanced Duality of Digital-Economy Globalization The Transformational Development of Socialist Foreign Trade with Chinese Characteristics and its Strategic Significance: A Review of Professor Shuli Song's “The Transformational Development of Socialist Foreign Trade with Chinese Characteristics: Based on the Empirical Study of Zhejiang's Private Ec Surprises in Life and a Retrospect of the Career in Economics: An Interview with Renowned American Economist Samuel Bowles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1