非常规储层吞吐循环注气机理

B. T. Hoffman, J. Rutledge
{"title":"非常规储层吞吐循环注气机理","authors":"B. T. Hoffman, J. Rutledge","doi":"10.2118/195223-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Unconventional oil reservoirs such as the Eagle Ford have had tremendous success over the last decade, but challenges remain as flow rates drop quickly and recovery factors are low; thus, enhanced oil recovery methods are needed to increase recovery. Interest in cyclic gas injection has risen as a number of successful pilots have been reported; however, little information is available on recovery mechanisms for the process. This paper evaluates oil swelling caused by diffusion and advection processes for gas injection in unconventional reservoirs.\n To accurately evaluate gas penetration into the matrix, the surface area of the hydraulic fractures needs to be known, and in this work, three different methods are used to estimate the area: volumetrics, well flow rates and linear fluid flow equations. Fick's law is used to determine the gas penetration depth caused by diffusion, and the linear form of Darcy's law is used to find the amount from advection. Then, with the use of swelling test information from lab tests, we are able to approximate the amount of oil recovery expected from cyclic gas injection operations.\n During the gas injection phase, gas from the fractures can enter the matrix by both advection (Darcy driven flow) and diffusion. We estimate that over 200 million scf of gas can enter the matrix during a 100 day injection/soak period. Using typical reservoir and fluid parameters, it appears that 40% is due to diffusion and 60% is due to advection. Sensitivity analysis shows that these numbers vary considerable based on the parameters used. Analytical models also show that during a 100 day production timeframe, over 14,000 stock tank barrels (STB) of oil can be produced due to huff-n-puff gas injection.\n Both gas injection and oil recovery amounts are compared to recent Eagle Ford gas injection pilot data, and the model results are consistent with the field pilot data.\n By determining the relative importance of the different recovery mechanisms, this paper provides a better understanding of what is happening in unconventional reservoirs during cyclic gas injection. This will allow more efficient injection schemes to be designed in the future.","PeriodicalId":11150,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, April 10, 2019","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanisms for Huff-n-Puff Cyclic Gas Injection into Unconventional Reservoirs\",\"authors\":\"B. T. Hoffman, J. Rutledge\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/195223-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Unconventional oil reservoirs such as the Eagle Ford have had tremendous success over the last decade, but challenges remain as flow rates drop quickly and recovery factors are low; thus, enhanced oil recovery methods are needed to increase recovery. Interest in cyclic gas injection has risen as a number of successful pilots have been reported; however, little information is available on recovery mechanisms for the process. This paper evaluates oil swelling caused by diffusion and advection processes for gas injection in unconventional reservoirs.\\n To accurately evaluate gas penetration into the matrix, the surface area of the hydraulic fractures needs to be known, and in this work, three different methods are used to estimate the area: volumetrics, well flow rates and linear fluid flow equations. Fick's law is used to determine the gas penetration depth caused by diffusion, and the linear form of Darcy's law is used to find the amount from advection. Then, with the use of swelling test information from lab tests, we are able to approximate the amount of oil recovery expected from cyclic gas injection operations.\\n During the gas injection phase, gas from the fractures can enter the matrix by both advection (Darcy driven flow) and diffusion. We estimate that over 200 million scf of gas can enter the matrix during a 100 day injection/soak period. Using typical reservoir and fluid parameters, it appears that 40% is due to diffusion and 60% is due to advection. Sensitivity analysis shows that these numbers vary considerable based on the parameters used. Analytical models also show that during a 100 day production timeframe, over 14,000 stock tank barrels (STB) of oil can be produced due to huff-n-puff gas injection.\\n Both gas injection and oil recovery amounts are compared to recent Eagle Ford gas injection pilot data, and the model results are consistent with the field pilot data.\\n By determining the relative importance of the different recovery mechanisms, this paper provides a better understanding of what is happening in unconventional reservoirs during cyclic gas injection. This will allow more efficient injection schemes to be designed in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, April 10, 2019\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, April 10, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/195223-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, April 10, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195223-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

在过去的十年中,Eagle Ford等非常规油藏取得了巨大的成功,但由于流速下降快,采收率低,挑战仍然存在;因此,需要采用提高采收率的方法来提高采收率。随着一些成功的试点项目的报道,人们对循环注气的兴趣也在上升;但是,关于该进程的恢复机制的信息很少。对非常规油藏注气过程中扩散和平流过程引起的油膨胀进行了评价。为了准确地评估气体进入基质的渗透率,需要知道水力裂缝的表面积,在这项工作中,使用了三种不同的方法来估算面积:体积法、井流量法和线性流体流动方程。用菲克定律来确定扩散引起的气体穿透深度,用线性形式的达西定律来求平流引起的量。然后,利用来自实验室测试的膨胀测试信息,我们能够估算出循环注气作业的预期采收率。在注气阶段,裂缝中的气体可以通过平流(达西驱动流)和扩散两种方式进入基质。我们估计,在100天的注入/浸泡期间,超过2亿立方英尺的气体可以进入基质。根据典型的储层和流体参数,40%是由于扩散作用,60%是由于平流作用。敏感性分析表明,这些数字根据所使用的参数变化很大。分析模型还显示,在100天的生产时间内,由于吞吐注气,可以生产超过14000桶原油。将注气量和采收率与Eagle Ford最近的注气量试验数据进行了比较,模型结果与现场试验数据一致。通过确定不同采收率机制的相对重要性,本文可以更好地了解非常规储层在循环注气过程中发生的情况。这将允许在未来设计更有效的注入方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mechanisms for Huff-n-Puff Cyclic Gas Injection into Unconventional Reservoirs
Unconventional oil reservoirs such as the Eagle Ford have had tremendous success over the last decade, but challenges remain as flow rates drop quickly and recovery factors are low; thus, enhanced oil recovery methods are needed to increase recovery. Interest in cyclic gas injection has risen as a number of successful pilots have been reported; however, little information is available on recovery mechanisms for the process. This paper evaluates oil swelling caused by diffusion and advection processes for gas injection in unconventional reservoirs. To accurately evaluate gas penetration into the matrix, the surface area of the hydraulic fractures needs to be known, and in this work, three different methods are used to estimate the area: volumetrics, well flow rates and linear fluid flow equations. Fick's law is used to determine the gas penetration depth caused by diffusion, and the linear form of Darcy's law is used to find the amount from advection. Then, with the use of swelling test information from lab tests, we are able to approximate the amount of oil recovery expected from cyclic gas injection operations. During the gas injection phase, gas from the fractures can enter the matrix by both advection (Darcy driven flow) and diffusion. We estimate that over 200 million scf of gas can enter the matrix during a 100 day injection/soak period. Using typical reservoir and fluid parameters, it appears that 40% is due to diffusion and 60% is due to advection. Sensitivity analysis shows that these numbers vary considerable based on the parameters used. Analytical models also show that during a 100 day production timeframe, over 14,000 stock tank barrels (STB) of oil can be produced due to huff-n-puff gas injection. Both gas injection and oil recovery amounts are compared to recent Eagle Ford gas injection pilot data, and the model results are consistent with the field pilot data. By determining the relative importance of the different recovery mechanisms, this paper provides a better understanding of what is happening in unconventional reservoirs during cyclic gas injection. This will allow more efficient injection schemes to be designed in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Capability of Temperature-Only Analysis for Zonal Flow Quantification Field Operations Strategy for Installing Beam Pumping Units at 660 Wells in Just six Months Application of Radial Jet Drilling Technique with Gyro System to Enhance Reservoir Potential in Mature Sand Stone Reservoir in Assam-Arakan Basin Candidate Selection to Execution: A Detailed Case Study A Case Study on Treating Oil Contaminants and Heavy Metal of Produced Water Through Phytoremediation Using Reed Bed Technology: A Success Story of 15 Years Operation of Heglig Oil Field of Sudan Prevent Fouling and Corrosion During Mill-Out Operations: Case Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1