对津巴布韦不同农业生态区小农水土保持做法和观念的评估

K. Musiyiwa , D. Harris , W. Leal Filho , W. Gwenzi , J. Nyamangara
{"title":"对津巴布韦不同农业生态区小农水土保持做法和观念的评估","authors":"K. Musiyiwa ,&nbsp;D. Harris ,&nbsp;W. Leal Filho ,&nbsp;W. Gwenzi ,&nbsp;J. Nyamangara","doi":"10.1016/j.wrr.2016.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Improved soil and water management practices can reduce moisture stress<span><span> and crop failures associated with rain-fed cropping systems. Little information exists on soil and water management technologies requirements for male and female farmers in different agro-ecological regions. The objective of current study was to investigate farmers’ sources of information and perceptions on soil and water management technologies. Four sites selected from different agro-ecological regions (AERs), sub-humid (Mazowe/Goromonzi, and Kadoma) and semi-arid (Matobo and Chiredzi). Data on sources of information on soil and water management, types of technologies preferred by farmers and constraints to adoption of technologies were collected through household interviews and focus group discussions. Results showed that government </span>extension agents<span>, farmer-to farmer extension and non-governmental organizations were the main sources of information on soil and water management technologies at all the sites. NGOs mainly provide information on reduced tillage methods. Main technologies were mulching (61%), reduced tillage methods (53%), and contour ridges (33%) in Mazowe/Goromonzi district, reduced tillage method (83) and mulching (64%) in Kadoma, and reduced tillage methods (54%) and contour ridges (47%) in Matobo. More farmers used soil and water management technologies at the sub-humid sites than at the semi-arid sites. Soil and water conservation technologies used were similar between male-headed (MHH) and female-headed households (FHH). Soil and water conservation technologies used by farmers matched their preferences in two of the four study sites. The findings are important for targeting soil and water management practices in the various agro-ecological zones.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101278,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources and Rural Development","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages 1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wrr.2016.09.001","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of smallholder soil and water conservation practices and perceptions in contrasting agro-ecological regions in Zimbabwe\",\"authors\":\"K. Musiyiwa ,&nbsp;D. Harris ,&nbsp;W. Leal Filho ,&nbsp;W. Gwenzi ,&nbsp;J. Nyamangara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wrr.2016.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Improved soil and water management practices can reduce moisture stress<span><span> and crop failures associated with rain-fed cropping systems. Little information exists on soil and water management technologies requirements for male and female farmers in different agro-ecological regions. The objective of current study was to investigate farmers’ sources of information and perceptions on soil and water management technologies. Four sites selected from different agro-ecological regions (AERs), sub-humid (Mazowe/Goromonzi, and Kadoma) and semi-arid (Matobo and Chiredzi). Data on sources of information on soil and water management, types of technologies preferred by farmers and constraints to adoption of technologies were collected through household interviews and focus group discussions. Results showed that government </span>extension agents<span>, farmer-to farmer extension and non-governmental organizations were the main sources of information on soil and water management technologies at all the sites. NGOs mainly provide information on reduced tillage methods. Main technologies were mulching (61%), reduced tillage methods (53%), and contour ridges (33%) in Mazowe/Goromonzi district, reduced tillage method (83) and mulching (64%) in Kadoma, and reduced tillage methods (54%) and contour ridges (47%) in Matobo. More farmers used soil and water management technologies at the sub-humid sites than at the semi-arid sites. Soil and water conservation technologies used were similar between male-headed (MHH) and female-headed households (FHH). Soil and water conservation technologies used by farmers matched their preferences in two of the four study sites. The findings are important for targeting soil and water management practices in the various agro-ecological zones.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Water Resources and Rural Development\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wrr.2016.09.001\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Water Resources and Rural Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212608216300262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources and Rural Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212608216300262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

改良的土壤和水资源管理做法可以减少与雨养种植系统有关的水分胁迫和作物歉收。关于不同农业生态区男女农民对水土管理技术需求的资料很少。本研究的目的是调查农民对水土管理技术的信息来源和看法。从不同的农业生态区(AERs)选择4个样点,分别是半湿润(Mazowe/Goromonzi和Kadoma)和半干旱(Matobo和Chiredzi)。通过家庭访谈和焦点小组讨论收集了有关水土管理信息来源、农民偏好的技术类型和采用技术的限制因素的数据。结果表明,政府推广机构、农民对农民推广机构和非政府组织是各站点水土管理技术信息的主要来源。非政府组织主要提供关于减少耕作方法的信息。马佐韦/戈罗蒙齐地区的主要技术为覆盖(61%)、减少耕作法(53%)和等高线(33%),卡多马地区的主要技术为减少耕作法(83%)和覆盖(64%),马托博地区的主要技术为减少耕作法(54%)和等高线(47%)。与半干旱地区相比,更多的农民在半湿润地区使用水土管理技术。使用的水土保持技术在男户主(MHH)和女户主(FHH)之间相似。在四个研究地点中的两个,农民使用的水土保持技术符合他们的偏好。这些发现对于针对不同农业生态区的水土管理实践具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An assessment of smallholder soil and water conservation practices and perceptions in contrasting agro-ecological regions in Zimbabwe

Improved soil and water management practices can reduce moisture stress and crop failures associated with rain-fed cropping systems. Little information exists on soil and water management technologies requirements for male and female farmers in different agro-ecological regions. The objective of current study was to investigate farmers’ sources of information and perceptions on soil and water management technologies. Four sites selected from different agro-ecological regions (AERs), sub-humid (Mazowe/Goromonzi, and Kadoma) and semi-arid (Matobo and Chiredzi). Data on sources of information on soil and water management, types of technologies preferred by farmers and constraints to adoption of technologies were collected through household interviews and focus group discussions. Results showed that government extension agents, farmer-to farmer extension and non-governmental organizations were the main sources of information on soil and water management technologies at all the sites. NGOs mainly provide information on reduced tillage methods. Main technologies were mulching (61%), reduced tillage methods (53%), and contour ridges (33%) in Mazowe/Goromonzi district, reduced tillage method (83) and mulching (64%) in Kadoma, and reduced tillage methods (54%) and contour ridges (47%) in Matobo. More farmers used soil and water management technologies at the sub-humid sites than at the semi-arid sites. Soil and water conservation technologies used were similar between male-headed (MHH) and female-headed households (FHH). Soil and water conservation technologies used by farmers matched their preferences in two of the four study sites. The findings are important for targeting soil and water management practices in the various agro-ecological zones.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring water security and water demand determinants in rural areas. The case of canton Cotacachi in Ecuador Bacterial contamination of drinking water and food utensils: Impacts of piped water on child health in north-western Bangladesh A critical mass analysis of community-based financing of water services in rural Kenya Comparison of informal rainwater harvesting systems to conventional water sources in terms of microbiological water quality The economic contribution of a recreational fishery in a remote rural economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1