爱尔兰成长调查中LGBT+青年对性取向和性别认同问题的看法:一项定性研究

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Youth Development Pub Date : 2023-02-15 DOI:10.3390/youth3010018
Nerilee Ceatha, Aaron Koay, Ayrton Kelly, Tara Killeen, K. Mccabe, James Murray, Jayson Pope, Niamh Scully, C. Buggy, D. Crowley
{"title":"爱尔兰成长调查中LGBT+青年对性取向和性别认同问题的看法:一项定性研究","authors":"Nerilee Ceatha, Aaron Koay, Ayrton Kelly, Tara Killeen, K. Mccabe, James Murray, Jayson Pope, Niamh Scully, C. Buggy, D. Crowley","doi":"10.3390/youth3010018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing importance of identifying lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT+) populations is a key driver in changes to demographic data collection in representative surveys of youth. While such population-based data are rare, Growing Up in Ireland (GUI), an Irish, government-funded, longitudinal survey, includes sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) measurements. This qualitative study responds to a query from the GUI study team and aims to identify how best to collect SOGI data in future waves of GUI. A university Human Research Ethics Committee granted approval for online consultations with LGBT+ youth (n = 6) with experiential expertise in policy making. The research is underpinned by rights-based public patient involvement (PPI) with recorded discussions, which were transcribed and imported into NVivo 12, generating the theme “recognition in research, policy and society”. This co-created article, with the LGBT+ young PPI Panel members, commends the inclusion of SOGI data in GUI and recommends changes in question placement and phrasing. Aligning with best practice, the PPI members provide a template for wording on consecutive sex and gender questions, expanded sexual orientation identity categories and maintaining the existing well-phrased transgender question from GUI. This offers potential to improve the quality of the SOGI data collected and the experience of those completing the questionnaire. These findings extend beyond GUI, with relevance for surveys with youth populations. This paper underscores the potential and benefits of participatory approaches to research with youth and views their role beyond simply as sources of data.","PeriodicalId":46087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth Development","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LGBT+ Youth Perspectives on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Questions in the Growing Up in Ireland Survey: A Qualitative Study\",\"authors\":\"Nerilee Ceatha, Aaron Koay, Ayrton Kelly, Tara Killeen, K. Mccabe, James Murray, Jayson Pope, Niamh Scully, C. Buggy, D. Crowley\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/youth3010018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increasing importance of identifying lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT+) populations is a key driver in changes to demographic data collection in representative surveys of youth. While such population-based data are rare, Growing Up in Ireland (GUI), an Irish, government-funded, longitudinal survey, includes sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) measurements. This qualitative study responds to a query from the GUI study team and aims to identify how best to collect SOGI data in future waves of GUI. A university Human Research Ethics Committee granted approval for online consultations with LGBT+ youth (n = 6) with experiential expertise in policy making. The research is underpinned by rights-based public patient involvement (PPI) with recorded discussions, which were transcribed and imported into NVivo 12, generating the theme “recognition in research, policy and society”. This co-created article, with the LGBT+ young PPI Panel members, commends the inclusion of SOGI data in GUI and recommends changes in question placement and phrasing. Aligning with best practice, the PPI members provide a template for wording on consecutive sex and gender questions, expanded sexual orientation identity categories and maintaining the existing well-phrased transgender question from GUI. This offers potential to improve the quality of the SOGI data collected and the experience of those completing the questionnaire. These findings extend beyond GUI, with relevance for surveys with youth populations. This paper underscores the potential and benefits of participatory approaches to research with youth and views their role beyond simply as sources of data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Youth Development\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Youth Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/youth3010018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/youth3010018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

识别女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别(LGBT+)人群的重要性日益增加,这是青年代表性调查中人口统计数据收集变化的关键驱动因素。虽然这种基于人口的数据很少,但爱尔兰政府资助的纵向调查“爱尔兰成长”(GUI)包括性取向和性别认同(SOGI)测量。这项定性研究回应了GUI研究团队的一个问题,旨在确定如何在未来的GUI浪潮中最好地收集SOGI数据。一所大学的人类研究伦理委员会批准了与LGBT+青年(n = 6)进行在线咨询,他们在政策制定方面具有经验专长。该研究以基于权利的公众患者参与(PPI)为基础,记录了讨论,这些讨论被转录并导入NVivo 12,产生了“研究,政策和社会中的认可”主题。这篇与LGBT+年轻PPI小组成员共同撰写的文章,赞扬在GUI中包含SOGI数据,并建议对问题的放置和措辞进行更改。与最佳实践相一致,PPI成员为连续的性和性别问题提供了措辞模板,扩展了性取向身份类别,并保留了GUI中现有的措辞良好的跨性别问题。这有可能提高所收集的SOGI数据的质量和填写调查表的人的经验。这些发现超出了图形用户界面,与青年人口调查相关。本文强调了参与青年研究方法的潜力和好处,并认为其作用不仅仅是作为数据来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LGBT+ Youth Perspectives on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Questions in the Growing Up in Ireland Survey: A Qualitative Study
The increasing importance of identifying lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT+) populations is a key driver in changes to demographic data collection in representative surveys of youth. While such population-based data are rare, Growing Up in Ireland (GUI), an Irish, government-funded, longitudinal survey, includes sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) measurements. This qualitative study responds to a query from the GUI study team and aims to identify how best to collect SOGI data in future waves of GUI. A university Human Research Ethics Committee granted approval for online consultations with LGBT+ youth (n = 6) with experiential expertise in policy making. The research is underpinned by rights-based public patient involvement (PPI) with recorded discussions, which were transcribed and imported into NVivo 12, generating the theme “recognition in research, policy and society”. This co-created article, with the LGBT+ young PPI Panel members, commends the inclusion of SOGI data in GUI and recommends changes in question placement and phrasing. Aligning with best practice, the PPI members provide a template for wording on consecutive sex and gender questions, expanded sexual orientation identity categories and maintaining the existing well-phrased transgender question from GUI. This offers potential to improve the quality of the SOGI data collected and the experience of those completing the questionnaire. These findings extend beyond GUI, with relevance for surveys with youth populations. This paper underscores the potential and benefits of participatory approaches to research with youth and views their role beyond simply as sources of data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Youth Development
Journal of Youth Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
26
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Friendship: The ‘Achilles Heel’ of European Youth Work Policy “I Don’t Feel Like There’s Enough Awareness about the Damage That Social Media Does”: A Thematic Analysis of the Relationships between Social Media Use, Mental Wellbeing, and Care Experience “It Feels like You’re a Stranger in Your Own Skin”: Young People’s Accounts of Everyday Embodiment “Only Time Will Tell”: The Underexplored Impacts of Lead Poisoning and COVID-19 on Pre-Existing ACEs in New York Outcomes beyond Evaluation: The Impetus and Measure of Relationships within Alternative Provisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1