“1619计划”争议的批判性话语分析及其对社会教育工作者的启示

A. Pickup, A. Southall
{"title":"“1619计划”争议的批判性话语分析及其对社会教育工作者的启示","authors":"A. Pickup, A. Southall","doi":"10.1080/00377996.2022.2039892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The protests of 2020 cast a national spotlight once again on police brutality and ongoing racial injustice in America. Within this context, many activists and even mainstream commentators have given more attention to a critical analysis of how American history has been taught, especially regarding race relations. The publication of the 1619 Project has touched off a wave of controversy regarding some of its historical claims and its larger interpretation of American history. In this paper, we analyze some of the discourses that have emerged from the post-publication controversy over the 1619 Project and then discuss applications of our inquiry for the preservice teacher classroom. The paper will provide an overview of the background of the topic, important theoretical frameworks, methods, and sources.","PeriodicalId":83074,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of social education : official journal of the Indiana Council for the Social Studies","volume":"46 1","pages":"223 - 236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Critical Discourse Analysis of the 1619 Project Controversy and Its Implications for Social Studies Educators\",\"authors\":\"A. Pickup, A. Southall\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00377996.2022.2039892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The protests of 2020 cast a national spotlight once again on police brutality and ongoing racial injustice in America. Within this context, many activists and even mainstream commentators have given more attention to a critical analysis of how American history has been taught, especially regarding race relations. The publication of the 1619 Project has touched off a wave of controversy regarding some of its historical claims and its larger interpretation of American history. In this paper, we analyze some of the discourses that have emerged from the post-publication controversy over the 1619 Project and then discuss applications of our inquiry for the preservice teacher classroom. The paper will provide an overview of the background of the topic, important theoretical frameworks, methods, and sources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of social education : official journal of the Indiana Council for the Social Studies\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"223 - 236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of social education : official journal of the Indiana Council for the Social Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2022.2039892\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of social education : official journal of the Indiana Council for the Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2022.2039892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2020年的抗议活动再次使美国警察暴行和持续的种族不公正成为全国关注的焦点。在这种背景下,许多活动人士甚至是主流评论员都更加关注对美国历史,特别是种族关系的教学方式进行批判性分析。《1619计划》的出版引发了一波关于它的一些历史主张和它对美国历史的更大解释的争议。在本文中,我们分析了一些在1619计划出版后的争议中出现的话语,然后讨论了我们的调查在职前教师课堂中的应用。本文将提供主题的背景,重要的理论框架,方法和来源的概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Critical Discourse Analysis of the 1619 Project Controversy and Its Implications for Social Studies Educators
Abstract The protests of 2020 cast a national spotlight once again on police brutality and ongoing racial injustice in America. Within this context, many activists and even mainstream commentators have given more attention to a critical analysis of how American history has been taught, especially regarding race relations. The publication of the 1619 Project has touched off a wave of controversy regarding some of its historical claims and its larger interpretation of American history. In this paper, we analyze some of the discourses that have emerged from the post-publication controversy over the 1619 Project and then discuss applications of our inquiry for the preservice teacher classroom. The paper will provide an overview of the background of the topic, important theoretical frameworks, methods, and sources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using SOURCES to Examine and Understand Immigrants’ Journeys to the United States through Ellis Island Preservice Teachers’ Written Responses to Refugee Experiences in a Graphic Novel Reimagining the COVID-19 Pandemic as a Portal to Justice for Asian American Students Inquiry Island - The Prequel: A Critical Ecological Social Studies Experience Teaching Resistance With Primary Sources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1