美国东北部的气候适应性管理:农村和城市林务员的共同策略和动机

Tessa C. McGann, R. Schattman, A. D’Amato, T. Ontl
{"title":"美国东北部的气候适应性管理:农村和城市林务员的共同策略和动机","authors":"Tessa C. McGann, R. Schattman, A. D’Amato, T. Ontl","doi":"10.1093/jofore/fvac039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Despite the mounting imperative for managers to help forests adapt to the rapidly shifting climate and related stressors, significant gaps remain between recommendations for adaptive forest management and its actual implementation across the globe. The research presented here offers a novel qualitative analysis regarding the current nature, extent, and drivers of adaptive management in the northeastern United States. Based on 32 in-depth semi-structured interviews with rural (n = 17) and urban foresters (n = 15) across New England and New York, we share a summary of (1) important environmental drivers of adaptation across the region, (2) commonly employed adaptive strategies, (3) significant barriers to adaptation, and (4) approaches to working through named barriers. We categorize adaptive practices of foresters as options of resistance, resilience, or transition, highlighting opportunities to increase the use of all three options across the landscape.\n Study Implications: Rural and urban foresters across the northeastern United States are responding to climate change with resistance and resilience-oriented adaptation practices. To achieve a greater mix of adaptation practices and outcomes on the ground, more focus can be given to mitigating risks associated with transition-oriented practices like assisted migration. Efforts can include outreach that compares the risks of not using transition practices (i.e., wait-and-see approach) with the financial risks of a preemptive approach and guidance for unfamiliar practices like planting future-adapted tree species. Financial assistance and public outreach may also increase the use of all three adaptation options across the region.","PeriodicalId":23386,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Climate Adaptive Management in the Northeastern United States: Common Strategies and Motivations of Rural and Urban Foresters\",\"authors\":\"Tessa C. McGann, R. Schattman, A. D’Amato, T. Ontl\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jofore/fvac039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Despite the mounting imperative for managers to help forests adapt to the rapidly shifting climate and related stressors, significant gaps remain between recommendations for adaptive forest management and its actual implementation across the globe. The research presented here offers a novel qualitative analysis regarding the current nature, extent, and drivers of adaptive management in the northeastern United States. Based on 32 in-depth semi-structured interviews with rural (n = 17) and urban foresters (n = 15) across New England and New York, we share a summary of (1) important environmental drivers of adaptation across the region, (2) commonly employed adaptive strategies, (3) significant barriers to adaptation, and (4) approaches to working through named barriers. We categorize adaptive practices of foresters as options of resistance, resilience, or transition, highlighting opportunities to increase the use of all three options across the landscape.\\n Study Implications: Rural and urban foresters across the northeastern United States are responding to climate change with resistance and resilience-oriented adaptation practices. To achieve a greater mix of adaptation practices and outcomes on the ground, more focus can be given to mitigating risks associated with transition-oriented practices like assisted migration. Efforts can include outreach that compares the risks of not using transition practices (i.e., wait-and-see approach) with the financial risks of a preemptive approach and guidance for unfamiliar practices like planting future-adapted tree species. Financial assistance and public outreach may also increase the use of all three adaptation options across the region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Forestry\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvac039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvac039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管管理者越来越迫切地需要帮助森林适应迅速变化的气候和相关压力,但适应性森林管理的建议与其在全球的实际实施之间仍然存在重大差距。本文提出的研究对美国东北部适应性管理的现状、程度和驱动因素进行了新颖的定性分析。基于对新英格兰和纽约农村(n = 17)和城市森林管理员(n = 15)的32次深度半结构化访谈,我们总结了:(1)整个地区适应的重要环境驱动因素,(2)常用的适应策略,(3)适应的重大障碍,以及(4)克服已知障碍的方法。我们将林农的适应性实践分为抵抗、恢复或过渡三种,强调了在整个景观中增加使用这三种选择的机会。研究意义:美国东北部的农村和城市林务人员正在以抵抗和恢复力为导向的适应实践应对气候变化。为了在实地实现适应实践和成果的更大结合,可以更加注重减轻与辅助迁移等面向转型的实践相关的风险。努力可以包括将不使用过渡实践(即观望方法)的风险与先发制人的方法的财务风险进行比较,并为不熟悉的实践(如种植适应未来的树种)提供指导。财政援助和公众宣传也可能增加整个地区对这三种适应方案的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Climate Adaptive Management in the Northeastern United States: Common Strategies and Motivations of Rural and Urban Foresters
Despite the mounting imperative for managers to help forests adapt to the rapidly shifting climate and related stressors, significant gaps remain between recommendations for adaptive forest management and its actual implementation across the globe. The research presented here offers a novel qualitative analysis regarding the current nature, extent, and drivers of adaptive management in the northeastern United States. Based on 32 in-depth semi-structured interviews with rural (n = 17) and urban foresters (n = 15) across New England and New York, we share a summary of (1) important environmental drivers of adaptation across the region, (2) commonly employed adaptive strategies, (3) significant barriers to adaptation, and (4) approaches to working through named barriers. We categorize adaptive practices of foresters as options of resistance, resilience, or transition, highlighting opportunities to increase the use of all three options across the landscape. Study Implications: Rural and urban foresters across the northeastern United States are responding to climate change with resistance and resilience-oriented adaptation practices. To achieve a greater mix of adaptation practices and outcomes on the ground, more focus can be given to mitigating risks associated with transition-oriented practices like assisted migration. Efforts can include outreach that compares the risks of not using transition practices (i.e., wait-and-see approach) with the financial risks of a preemptive approach and guidance for unfamiliar practices like planting future-adapted tree species. Financial assistance and public outreach may also increase the use of all three adaptation options across the region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Batı Karadeniz Bölgesi Kazdağı göknarı ormanlarında göknar ökseotu bulunma ve bulaşma durumu: Kökez Orman İşletme Şefliği örneği Hitit metinlerinde orman Almus yöresi doğal doğu kayını meşcerelerinin çap dağılımının Weibull dağılımı ile modellenmesi Türkiye’nin kuzeybatısındaki bir plantasyonda yerli ve egzotik çam türlerinin ibrelerinde görülen fungal endofitler Assessing Mid-rotation Loblolly Pine and Competing Vegetation Responses to Post-thin Fertilization and Herbicide Application in the Southeastern United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1