双边投资条约(BITs)在瑞士的作用:从企业家的角度看其重要性和替代方案

Valentin Jentsch
{"title":"双边投资条约(BITs)在瑞士的作用:从企业家的角度看其重要性和替代方案","authors":"Valentin Jentsch","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1400747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bilateral investment treaties (BITs) are instruments that aim at promoting and protecting foreign direct investment (FDI). Switzerland holds a leading position worldwide with regard to the negotiation and conclusion of BITs: The Swiss government has ratified 113 of such treaties so far, which means that about every 23rd BIT worldwide is concluded between Switzerland and a third state. Other alternatives for the protection of FDI include (i) political risk insurance (PRI), such as multilateral and national investment guarantees or private investment insurances, (ii) traditional diplomatic protection, and (iii) state contracts, such as concession agreements.The purpose of this paper is to analyze the importance of BITs as well as alternative instruments to safeguard FDI from an entrepreneurial perspective, and to verify whether Swiss enterprises investing abroad appreciate the efforts undertaken by their government. In this endeavor, the first part of the paper outlines the theoretical framework of different instruments offering political risk protection for FDI. The second part of the paper presents the results of an empirical analysis conducted in Switzerland. In this part, a qualitative analysis through explorative and semi-structured interviews, as well as a quantitative analysis using a two-page questionnaire was conducted.The results of the study indicate that BITs are accepted instruments to safeguard FDI in the community of states, and BITs will remain important to private sector companies as long as no multilateral agreement emerges. Particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) appreciate these treaties, while state contracts seem to be the most important alternative to BITs, and PRI schemes are fairly unpopular among Swiss enterprises. Although the relationship between BITs and PRI is by far not clear, it is widely acknowledged among practitioners that there is a need for comprehensive strategies, including PRIs in the first place followed by BITs as well as other international institutions.","PeriodicalId":14396,"journal":{"name":"International Trade","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) in Switzerland: Importance and Alternatives from an Entrepreneurial Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Valentin Jentsch\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1400747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bilateral investment treaties (BITs) are instruments that aim at promoting and protecting foreign direct investment (FDI). Switzerland holds a leading position worldwide with regard to the negotiation and conclusion of BITs: The Swiss government has ratified 113 of such treaties so far, which means that about every 23rd BIT worldwide is concluded between Switzerland and a third state. Other alternatives for the protection of FDI include (i) political risk insurance (PRI), such as multilateral and national investment guarantees or private investment insurances, (ii) traditional diplomatic protection, and (iii) state contracts, such as concession agreements.The purpose of this paper is to analyze the importance of BITs as well as alternative instruments to safeguard FDI from an entrepreneurial perspective, and to verify whether Swiss enterprises investing abroad appreciate the efforts undertaken by their government. In this endeavor, the first part of the paper outlines the theoretical framework of different instruments offering political risk protection for FDI. The second part of the paper presents the results of an empirical analysis conducted in Switzerland. In this part, a qualitative analysis through explorative and semi-structured interviews, as well as a quantitative analysis using a two-page questionnaire was conducted.The results of the study indicate that BITs are accepted instruments to safeguard FDI in the community of states, and BITs will remain important to private sector companies as long as no multilateral agreement emerges. Particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) appreciate these treaties, while state contracts seem to be the most important alternative to BITs, and PRI schemes are fairly unpopular among Swiss enterprises. Although the relationship between BITs and PRI is by far not clear, it is widely acknowledged among practitioners that there is a need for comprehensive strategies, including PRIs in the first place followed by BITs as well as other international institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Trade\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Trade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1400747\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Trade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1400747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

双边投资条约(BITs)是旨在促进和保护外国直接投资(FDI)的工具。瑞士在双边投资协定的谈判和缔结方面处于世界领先地位:迄今为止,瑞士政府已批准了113项此类条约,这意味着全球大约每23个双边投资协定就有一个是瑞士与第三国缔结的。保护外国直接投资的其他选择包括:(i)政治风险保险(PRI),如多边和国家投资担保或私人投资保险;(ii)传统的外交保护;(iii)国家合同,如特许协议。本文的目的是从企业家的角度分析双边投资协定的重要性以及保护外国直接投资的替代工具,并验证在海外投资的瑞士企业是否赞赏其政府所做的努力。本文第一部分概述了为FDI提供政治风险保护的不同工具的理论框架。论文的第二部分介绍了在瑞士进行的实证分析的结果。在这一部分中,通过探索性和半结构化访谈进行了定性分析,并使用两页的问卷进行了定量分析。研究结果表明,双边投资协定是国际社会公认的保护外国直接投资的工具,只要没有达成多边协议,双边投资协定对私营部门公司仍将是重要的。尤其是中小型企业(SMEs)欣赏这些条约,而国家合同似乎是双边投资协定最重要的替代方案,而PRI计划在瑞士企业中相当不受欢迎。尽管双边投资协定和PRI之间的关系到目前为止还不清楚,但从业者普遍认为需要制定综合战略,首先包括PRI,其次是双边投资协定以及其他国际机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Role of Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) in Switzerland: Importance and Alternatives from an Entrepreneurial Perspective
Bilateral investment treaties (BITs) are instruments that aim at promoting and protecting foreign direct investment (FDI). Switzerland holds a leading position worldwide with regard to the negotiation and conclusion of BITs: The Swiss government has ratified 113 of such treaties so far, which means that about every 23rd BIT worldwide is concluded between Switzerland and a third state. Other alternatives for the protection of FDI include (i) political risk insurance (PRI), such as multilateral and national investment guarantees or private investment insurances, (ii) traditional diplomatic protection, and (iii) state contracts, such as concession agreements.The purpose of this paper is to analyze the importance of BITs as well as alternative instruments to safeguard FDI from an entrepreneurial perspective, and to verify whether Swiss enterprises investing abroad appreciate the efforts undertaken by their government. In this endeavor, the first part of the paper outlines the theoretical framework of different instruments offering political risk protection for FDI. The second part of the paper presents the results of an empirical analysis conducted in Switzerland. In this part, a qualitative analysis through explorative and semi-structured interviews, as well as a quantitative analysis using a two-page questionnaire was conducted.The results of the study indicate that BITs are accepted instruments to safeguard FDI in the community of states, and BITs will remain important to private sector companies as long as no multilateral agreement emerges. Particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) appreciate these treaties, while state contracts seem to be the most important alternative to BITs, and PRI schemes are fairly unpopular among Swiss enterprises. Although the relationship between BITs and PRI is by far not clear, it is widely acknowledged among practitioners that there is a need for comprehensive strategies, including PRIs in the first place followed by BITs as well as other international institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Case for Free Trade Gray Areas Developing Countries China Trade Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1