{"title":"第二佛朗哥主义和过渡时期西班牙(拉康)精神分析研究的五个初步关键","authors":"R. Bilbao, R. Huertas","doi":"10.3989/asclepio.2019.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article identifies and proposes five key elements to be taken into account in analysing the reception and development of psychoanalysis in Spain under the later Franco regime and during the Transition: 1) the absence – or very limited presence – of psychoanalytic points of reference in psychiatric production during the 1950s and 1960s; 2) the connections between psychoanalysis, anti-psychiatry and structuralism; 3) the importance of the arrival in Spain of Oscar Masotta, and his ‘lay’ psychoanalysis, in consolidating a psychoanalytic discourse and practice outside the IPA; 4) the influence of Argentinian psychoanalysts who came to Spain following the coup d’etat in their country; and 5) the importance of the Revista de la Asociacion Espanola de Neuropsiquiatria in disseminating and communicating psychoanalysis. These five keys group together situations and processes which have been studied to varying extents, but which it seems essential to consider as a whole in order to obtain an overall view of the process. We conclude that relations between psychiatry and psychoanalysis, the circulation of knowledge, and the socio-political and cultural context, etc. explain, among other things, the characteristics of the reception and development of a post- Freudian psychoanalysis in which the Lacanian position predominated over other approaches and schools.","PeriodicalId":44082,"journal":{"name":"Asclepio-Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia","volume":"9 1","pages":"281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cinco claves preliminares para el estudio del psicoanálisis (lacaniano) en la España del segundo franquismo y la transición\",\"authors\":\"R. Bilbao, R. Huertas\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/asclepio.2019.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article identifies and proposes five key elements to be taken into account in analysing the reception and development of psychoanalysis in Spain under the later Franco regime and during the Transition: 1) the absence – or very limited presence – of psychoanalytic points of reference in psychiatric production during the 1950s and 1960s; 2) the connections between psychoanalysis, anti-psychiatry and structuralism; 3) the importance of the arrival in Spain of Oscar Masotta, and his ‘lay’ psychoanalysis, in consolidating a psychoanalytic discourse and practice outside the IPA; 4) the influence of Argentinian psychoanalysts who came to Spain following the coup d’etat in their country; and 5) the importance of the Revista de la Asociacion Espanola de Neuropsiquiatria in disseminating and communicating psychoanalysis. These five keys group together situations and processes which have been studied to varying extents, but which it seems essential to consider as a whole in order to obtain an overall view of the process. We conclude that relations between psychiatry and psychoanalysis, the circulation of knowledge, and the socio-political and cultural context, etc. explain, among other things, the characteristics of the reception and development of a post- Freudian psychoanalysis in which the Lacanian position predominated over other approaches and schools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asclepio-Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asclepio-Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/asclepio.2019.22\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asclepio-Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/asclepio.2019.22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
本文确定并提出了在分析佛朗哥政权后期和过渡时期西班牙精神分析的接受和发展时需要考虑的五个关键因素:1)20世纪50年代和60年代精神病学生产中精神分析参考点的缺失或非常有限的存在;精神分析、反精神病学和结构主义之间的联系;3) Oscar Masotta抵达西班牙的重要性,以及他的“外行”精神分析,在巩固国际摄影协会之外的精神分析话语和实践方面;4)政变后来到西班牙的阿根廷精神分析学家的影响;5)西班牙精神病学协会在传播和交流精神分析学方面的重要性。这五个关键要素将已经在不同程度上研究过的情况和过程组合在一起,但为了获得整个过程的总体视图,似乎必须将其作为一个整体加以考虑。我们的结论是,精神病学和精神分析之间的关系,知识的循环,社会政治和文化背景等,除其他外,解释了后弗洛伊德精神分析的接受和发展特征,其中拉康的立场主导了其他方法和学派。
Cinco claves preliminares para el estudio del psicoanálisis (lacaniano) en la España del segundo franquismo y la transición
This article identifies and proposes five key elements to be taken into account in analysing the reception and development of psychoanalysis in Spain under the later Franco regime and during the Transition: 1) the absence – or very limited presence – of psychoanalytic points of reference in psychiatric production during the 1950s and 1960s; 2) the connections between psychoanalysis, anti-psychiatry and structuralism; 3) the importance of the arrival in Spain of Oscar Masotta, and his ‘lay’ psychoanalysis, in consolidating a psychoanalytic discourse and practice outside the IPA; 4) the influence of Argentinian psychoanalysts who came to Spain following the coup d’etat in their country; and 5) the importance of the Revista de la Asociacion Espanola de Neuropsiquiatria in disseminating and communicating psychoanalysis. These five keys group together situations and processes which have been studied to varying extents, but which it seems essential to consider as a whole in order to obtain an overall view of the process. We conclude that relations between psychiatry and psychoanalysis, the circulation of knowledge, and the socio-political and cultural context, etc. explain, among other things, the characteristics of the reception and development of a post- Freudian psychoanalysis in which the Lacanian position predominated over other approaches and schools.