“权力地位嵌入我们的思想”:印度心理治疗伦理焦点小组讨论

Ananya Sinha, P. Bhola, A. Raguram, P. Chandra
{"title":"“权力地位嵌入我们的思想”:印度心理治疗伦理焦点小组讨论","authors":"Ananya Sinha, P. Bhola, A. Raguram, P. Chandra","doi":"10.1080/17542863.2017.1294192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background: Ethical issues are ubiquitous during therapeutic work, despite the presence of professional ethics codes that guide ethical decision making. This exploratory research looks at how mental health trainees and practitioners, across various mental health disciplines, perceive and experience ethical dilemmas in the therapy space. Method: The sample included 12 mental health practitioners from varied mental health disciplines (clinical psychology, psychiatry and psychiatric social work), and practising counsellors, from an urban city in India. Three focus group discussions were conducted, where participants expressed the ethical issues and challenges encountered during their sessions with clients. Results: Content analysis of the narratives of the focus group discussions highlighted prominent ethical dilemmas in these domains: negotiation of boundaries or frames of the interaction; involvement of family in therapeutic decisions; negotiation of issues of gender and power in therapy; value conflicts in working with sexuality issues; therapist competence; and method of resolution of ethical dilemmas. Personal and cultural values emerged as impacting the perceptions, interpretations and experience of ethically challenging situations. The findings have implications for the development of culturally sensitive and value-based training methodologies.","PeriodicalId":38926,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"217 - 227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Power positions are embedded in our minds’: focus group discussions on psychotherapy ethics in India\",\"authors\":\"Ananya Sinha, P. Bhola, A. Raguram, P. Chandra\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17542863.2017.1294192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background: Ethical issues are ubiquitous during therapeutic work, despite the presence of professional ethics codes that guide ethical decision making. This exploratory research looks at how mental health trainees and practitioners, across various mental health disciplines, perceive and experience ethical dilemmas in the therapy space. Method: The sample included 12 mental health practitioners from varied mental health disciplines (clinical psychology, psychiatry and psychiatric social work), and practising counsellors, from an urban city in India. Three focus group discussions were conducted, where participants expressed the ethical issues and challenges encountered during their sessions with clients. Results: Content analysis of the narratives of the focus group discussions highlighted prominent ethical dilemmas in these domains: negotiation of boundaries or frames of the interaction; involvement of family in therapeutic decisions; negotiation of issues of gender and power in therapy; value conflicts in working with sexuality issues; therapist competence; and method of resolution of ethical dilemmas. Personal and cultural values emerged as impacting the perceptions, interpretations and experience of ethically challenging situations. The findings have implications for the development of culturally sensitive and value-based training methodologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"217 - 227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2017.1294192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2017.1294192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:尽管存在指导伦理决策的职业道德规范,但伦理问题在治疗工作中无处不在。本探索性研究着眼于心理健康培训生和从业者,跨越各种心理健康学科,如何感知和体验治疗空间中的伦理困境。方法:样本包括来自不同心理健康学科(临床心理学、精神病学和精神病学社会工作)的12名心理健康从业人员,以及来自印度一个城市的执业咨询师。进行了三次焦点小组讨论,参与者表达了与客户会面时遇到的道德问题和挑战。结果:焦点小组讨论叙述的内容分析突出了这些领域中突出的伦理困境:边界谈判或互动框架;家庭参与治疗决策;心理治疗中性别与权力问题的协商处理性问题时的价值冲突;治疗师的能力;以及解决伦理困境的方法。个人和文化价值观的出现影响了对道德挑战情况的感知、解释和体验。研究结果对发展具有文化敏感性和基于价值的培训方法具有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Power positions are embedded in our minds’: focus group discussions on psychotherapy ethics in India
ABSTRACT Background: Ethical issues are ubiquitous during therapeutic work, despite the presence of professional ethics codes that guide ethical decision making. This exploratory research looks at how mental health trainees and practitioners, across various mental health disciplines, perceive and experience ethical dilemmas in the therapy space. Method: The sample included 12 mental health practitioners from varied mental health disciplines (clinical psychology, psychiatry and psychiatric social work), and practising counsellors, from an urban city in India. Three focus group discussions were conducted, where participants expressed the ethical issues and challenges encountered during their sessions with clients. Results: Content analysis of the narratives of the focus group discussions highlighted prominent ethical dilemmas in these domains: negotiation of boundaries or frames of the interaction; involvement of family in therapeutic decisions; negotiation of issues of gender and power in therapy; value conflicts in working with sexuality issues; therapist competence; and method of resolution of ethical dilemmas. Personal and cultural values emerged as impacting the perceptions, interpretations and experience of ethically challenging situations. The findings have implications for the development of culturally sensitive and value-based training methodologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Culture and Mental Health
International Journal of Culture and Mental Health Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: This title has ceased (2018). This important peer-review journal provides an innovative forum, both international and multidisciplinary, for addressing cross-cultural issues and mental health. Culture as it comes to bear on mental health is a rapidly expanding area of inquiry and research within psychiatry and psychology, and other related fields such as social work, with important implications for practice in the global context. The journal is an essential resource for health care professionals working in the field of cross-cultural mental health.Readership includes psychiatrists, psychologists, medical anthropologists, medical sociologists, psychiatric nurses and social workers, general practitioners and other mental health professionals interested in the area. The International Journal of Culture and Mental Health publishes original empirical research, review papers and theoretical articles in the fields of cross-cultural psychiatry and psychology. Contributions from the fields of medical anthropology and medical sociology are particularly welcome. A continuing dialogue between members of various disciplines in various fields is encouraged. The aim of the journal is to encourage its readers to think about various issues which have clouded cross-cultural development of ideas. The journal lays special emphasis on developing further links between medical anthropology, medical sociology, clinical psychiatry and psychology, and implications of the findings on service provisions. The journal is published four times a year. The style of reference is Harvard. All research articles in this journal, including those in special issues, special sections or supplements, have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two independent referees.
期刊最新文献
Acculturation, ethnic identity, and psychological well-being of Albanian-American immigrants in the United States Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the Alexithymia Questionnaire for Children (AQC) in children and adolescents Psychometric properties of the Gabonese version of the horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism scale among employees Disabled or Deaf? Investigating mental health clinicians’ knowledge of and attitude towards Deafness as a culture* Experiences of HIV stigma in rural Southern religious settings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1