非金属假体固定髌骨骨折

Tsz Ying Giselle Ho, Michelle Lee Syn Yuk
{"title":"非金属假体固定髌骨骨折","authors":"Tsz Ying Giselle Ho, Michelle Lee Syn Yuk","doi":"10.1177/22104917231197234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patella fracture fixations were traditionally done using metal tension band wiring techniques. However, complications associated with metallic implants causing soft tissue irritation are not infrequent. Since 1998, there have been emerging case reports and series reporting the use of non-metallic implants, such as braided sutures, in the fixation of patella fractures 3. However, there is a limited clinical study on a direct comparison between metal and suture fixation in patella fractures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of all-suture fixation in patella fractures and to compare all-suture and metal fixation in mid-pole fractures. A total number of 50 patients with operated fracture patella were retrospectively reviewed in a 2.5-year period. Primary outcomes included operation time, time for fracture union and postoperative knee function. Secondary outcomes include complications, need for secondary operations due to prominent implants, infection or loss of fixation. There was no statistically significant difference concerning time for fracture union, operation time and postoperative functional knee score between the three fixation methods. The rate of secondary operations was higher in the hybrid group (7 out of 11, 63.6%) and metal group (7 out of 13, 53.8%), and was lowest in an all-suture group (0 out of 28, 0%). Metal implant breakage and soft tissue irritation were the main reasons for secondary operations, which was significantly lower in the all-suture group ( p < 0.0003). Subgroup analysis for mid-pole patella fractures showed similar results in which all primary outcomes showed no statistically significant difference, while the need for secondary operations was higher in the metal group ( p < 0.003). All-suture fixation for patella fractures is a feasible option not limited to distal pole fractures. In our series, this technique achieved similar outcomes when compared with traditional metal implants, with lower rates of secondary operations, and could be safely employed in mid-pole fractures as well.","PeriodicalId":42408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fixation of patella fracture with non-metallic implant\",\"authors\":\"Tsz Ying Giselle Ho, Michelle Lee Syn Yuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22104917231197234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patella fracture fixations were traditionally done using metal tension band wiring techniques. However, complications associated with metallic implants causing soft tissue irritation are not infrequent. Since 1998, there have been emerging case reports and series reporting the use of non-metallic implants, such as braided sutures, in the fixation of patella fractures 3. However, there is a limited clinical study on a direct comparison between metal and suture fixation in patella fractures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of all-suture fixation in patella fractures and to compare all-suture and metal fixation in mid-pole fractures. A total number of 50 patients with operated fracture patella were retrospectively reviewed in a 2.5-year period. Primary outcomes included operation time, time for fracture union and postoperative knee function. Secondary outcomes include complications, need for secondary operations due to prominent implants, infection or loss of fixation. There was no statistically significant difference concerning time for fracture union, operation time and postoperative functional knee score between the three fixation methods. The rate of secondary operations was higher in the hybrid group (7 out of 11, 63.6%) and metal group (7 out of 13, 53.8%), and was lowest in an all-suture group (0 out of 28, 0%). Metal implant breakage and soft tissue irritation were the main reasons for secondary operations, which was significantly lower in the all-suture group ( p < 0.0003). Subgroup analysis for mid-pole patella fractures showed similar results in which all primary outcomes showed no statistically significant difference, while the need for secondary operations was higher in the metal group ( p < 0.003). All-suture fixation for patella fractures is a feasible option not limited to distal pole fractures. In our series, this technique achieved similar outcomes when compared with traditional metal implants, with lower rates of secondary operations, and could be safely employed in mid-pole fractures as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917231197234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917231197234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

髌骨骨折固定传统上使用金属张力带钢丝技术。然而,金属植入引起软组织刺激的并发症并不少见。自1998年以来,出现了使用非金属植入物(如编织线)固定髌骨骨折的病例报告和系列报道3。然而,在髌骨骨折中直接比较金属和缝合固定的临床研究有限。本研究的目的是评估全缝合固定在髌骨骨折中的效果,并比较全缝合和金属固定在中极骨折中的效果。本文回顾性分析了2.5年期间共50例髌骨骨折手术患者。主要结局包括手术时间、骨折愈合时间和术后膝关节功能。次要结果包括并发症、因植入物突出而需要二次手术、感染或固定物丢失。三种固定方式骨折愈合时间、手术时间及术后膝关节功能评分差异均无统计学意义。复合组(7 / 11,63.6%)和金属组(7 / 13,53.8%)的二次手术发生率最高,全缝合组(0 / 28,0%)的二次手术发生率最低。金属种植体断裂和软组织刺激是二次手术的主要原因,全缝线组的二次手术发生率明显低于全缝线组(p < 0.0003)。髌骨中极骨折的亚组分析结果相似,所有主要结局无统计学差异,而金属组的二次手术需求更高(p < 0.003)。全缝线固定髌骨骨折是一种可行的选择,但不限于远端骨折。在我们的研究中,与传统的金属植入物相比,该技术取得了相似的结果,二次手术率较低,并且可以安全地用于中极骨折。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fixation of patella fracture with non-metallic implant
Patella fracture fixations were traditionally done using metal tension band wiring techniques. However, complications associated with metallic implants causing soft tissue irritation are not infrequent. Since 1998, there have been emerging case reports and series reporting the use of non-metallic implants, such as braided sutures, in the fixation of patella fractures 3. However, there is a limited clinical study on a direct comparison between metal and suture fixation in patella fractures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of all-suture fixation in patella fractures and to compare all-suture and metal fixation in mid-pole fractures. A total number of 50 patients with operated fracture patella were retrospectively reviewed in a 2.5-year period. Primary outcomes included operation time, time for fracture union and postoperative knee function. Secondary outcomes include complications, need for secondary operations due to prominent implants, infection or loss of fixation. There was no statistically significant difference concerning time for fracture union, operation time and postoperative functional knee score between the three fixation methods. The rate of secondary operations was higher in the hybrid group (7 out of 11, 63.6%) and metal group (7 out of 13, 53.8%), and was lowest in an all-suture group (0 out of 28, 0%). Metal implant breakage and soft tissue irritation were the main reasons for secondary operations, which was significantly lower in the all-suture group ( p < 0.0003). Subgroup analysis for mid-pole patella fractures showed similar results in which all primary outcomes showed no statistically significant difference, while the need for secondary operations was higher in the metal group ( p < 0.003). All-suture fixation for patella fractures is a feasible option not limited to distal pole fractures. In our series, this technique achieved similar outcomes when compared with traditional metal implants, with lower rates of secondary operations, and could be safely employed in mid-pole fractures as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultrasonic measurement for the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome: A study in the Hong Kong Chinese population The surgical outcome of postoperative radial neck nonunion: Retrospective case series with systematic review Tip-to-apex distance does not predict fixation failure regardless of reduction quality in intra-capsular neck of femur fractures treated with femoral neck system Real world patient-reported and health care professional-perceived pain severity in outpatient fracture clinic procedures Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on sports and arthroscopic surgery in local hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1