兜圈子:哈萨克斯坦教师职业地位的提升

Q4 Social Sciences Glasnik - Srpskog Geografskog Drustva Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2298/gsgd2202107k
O. Kirichok
{"title":"兜圈子:哈萨克斯坦教师职业地位的提升","authors":"O. Kirichok","doi":"10.2298/gsgd2202107k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teachers as an essential part of education system contribute crucially to its quality, moreover, the status of teaching profession indicates how the society values the education. The article provides a critical discourse analysis of the Program for Education Development 2011-2020 with regards to improvement of status of teaching profession in Kazakhstan. The study concentrates on the gaps between the planned and realized outcomes of the Program of Educational Development in Kazakhstan from the point of view of 50 teachers interviewed. The study targeted low qualification of teachers and insufficient oversight of teacher practice as central factors, which lead to low Teacher Status. Focusing on the tension between teachers and policy makers over the teacher status, which remains unchanged, the research revealed the subcourses of law qualification of teachers, identifying low payment, low academic preparation and lack of selectivity of future teachers as subcourses. The article examines the planned and realized outcomes of the initiatives such as launching three level professional training for teachers, issuing vouchers to teachers for their professional development, performance-based payment, increasing enrolment entrance barrier to Pedagogical Universities and teachers? compulsory attestation once in 5 years, which lead to going round in circles. The implications of the study are in providing new insights on the issue of status of teaching profession and determining the reasons of slow progress in status of teaching profession, which needs further exploration in the global scale.","PeriodicalId":35518,"journal":{"name":"Glasnik - Srpskog Geografskog Drustva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Going round in circles: Increasing status of teacher occupation in Kazakhstan\",\"authors\":\"O. Kirichok\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/gsgd2202107k\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Teachers as an essential part of education system contribute crucially to its quality, moreover, the status of teaching profession indicates how the society values the education. The article provides a critical discourse analysis of the Program for Education Development 2011-2020 with regards to improvement of status of teaching profession in Kazakhstan. The study concentrates on the gaps between the planned and realized outcomes of the Program of Educational Development in Kazakhstan from the point of view of 50 teachers interviewed. The study targeted low qualification of teachers and insufficient oversight of teacher practice as central factors, which lead to low Teacher Status. Focusing on the tension between teachers and policy makers over the teacher status, which remains unchanged, the research revealed the subcourses of law qualification of teachers, identifying low payment, low academic preparation and lack of selectivity of future teachers as subcourses. The article examines the planned and realized outcomes of the initiatives such as launching three level professional training for teachers, issuing vouchers to teachers for their professional development, performance-based payment, increasing enrolment entrance barrier to Pedagogical Universities and teachers? compulsory attestation once in 5 years, which lead to going round in circles. The implications of the study are in providing new insights on the issue of status of teaching profession and determining the reasons of slow progress in status of teaching profession, which needs further exploration in the global scale.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Glasnik - Srpskog Geografskog Drustva\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Glasnik - Srpskog Geografskog Drustva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/gsgd2202107k\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glasnik - Srpskog Geografskog Drustva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/gsgd2202107k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教师作为教育体系的重要组成部分,对教育质量起着至关重要的作用,教师职业的地位反映了社会对教育的重视程度。本文对《2011-2020年教育发展规划》在提高哈萨克斯坦教师职业地位方面进行了批判性话语分析。该研究从50名受访教师的角度,集中研究了哈萨克斯坦教育发展计划的计划成果与实现成果之间的差距。本研究针对导致教师地位低下的核心因素是教师素质不高和对教师实践监督不足。研究聚焦于教师与政策制定者在教师地位问题上的紧张关系,这一紧张关系仍未改变,研究揭示了教师法律资格的子课程,发现了未来教师作为子课程的低报酬、低学术准备和缺乏选择性。本文考察了计划和实现的成果,如启动教师三级专业培训,向教师发放专业发展券,基于绩效的薪酬,提高师范大学和教师的入学门槛。每5年进行一次强制认证,这是在原地打转。本研究的意义在于对教师专业地位问题提供了新的见解,并确定了教师专业地位进展缓慢的原因,这需要在全球范围内进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Going round in circles: Increasing status of teacher occupation in Kazakhstan
Teachers as an essential part of education system contribute crucially to its quality, moreover, the status of teaching profession indicates how the society values the education. The article provides a critical discourse analysis of the Program for Education Development 2011-2020 with regards to improvement of status of teaching profession in Kazakhstan. The study concentrates on the gaps between the planned and realized outcomes of the Program of Educational Development in Kazakhstan from the point of view of 50 teachers interviewed. The study targeted low qualification of teachers and insufficient oversight of teacher practice as central factors, which lead to low Teacher Status. Focusing on the tension between teachers and policy makers over the teacher status, which remains unchanged, the research revealed the subcourses of law qualification of teachers, identifying low payment, low academic preparation and lack of selectivity of future teachers as subcourses. The article examines the planned and realized outcomes of the initiatives such as launching three level professional training for teachers, issuing vouchers to teachers for their professional development, performance-based payment, increasing enrolment entrance barrier to Pedagogical Universities and teachers? compulsory attestation once in 5 years, which lead to going round in circles. The implications of the study are in providing new insights on the issue of status of teaching profession and determining the reasons of slow progress in status of teaching profession, which needs further exploration in the global scale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Glasnik - Srpskog Geografskog Drustva
Glasnik - Srpskog Geografskog Drustva Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
No more mr. NIS guy: Investigating corrosive capital in the Serbian energy industry The contribution of the road transport network to supporting development: The case of the Wilaya of M'sila, Algeria Man, space and tourism Hotels vs private accommodation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Serbia? In search of an architectural genome of traditional houses: Case of the habitat of the Dechras of Arris
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1