教会和国家的财富组织:19年格特博格市的教堂20年世纪

Stephan Dusil
{"title":"教会和国家的财富组织:19年格特博格市的教堂20年世纪","authors":"Stephan Dusil","doi":"10.1515/zrgk-2022-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Administration of Ecclesiastical Goods between State and Church: Fabricae Ecclesiae in Wuerttemberg in the 19th and 20th centuries. Since the Middle Ages, fabricae ecclesiae served to finance the erection and the maintenance of churches. The Church claimed to freely administer these goods, even if lay men often served as administrators. In the 19th century, the Kingdom of Wuerttemberg took over control of these goods and ordered the state municipality, assisted by local clerics, to govern them. In 1887, the king of Wuerttemberg started a process to separate ecclesiastical from secular goods. After WWI, the fabricae ecclesiae in Wuerttemberg were administered entirely by the Catholic Church. This contribution analyses this evolution from three perspectives, namely universal canon law, state law in Wuerttemberg, and particular canon law. It thereby highlights the tension between self-administration and state control of ecclesiastical goods, especially in the 19th century, and points to the fact that even the Catholic Church was part of the secular ruler’s authority over the church.","PeriodicalId":24010,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pfarrliche Vermögensorganisation zwischen Kirche und Staat: Kirchenpflegen (Kirchenfabriken) in Württemberg im 19. und beginnenden 20. Jahrhundert\",\"authors\":\"Stephan Dusil\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/zrgk-2022-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The Administration of Ecclesiastical Goods between State and Church: Fabricae Ecclesiae in Wuerttemberg in the 19th and 20th centuries. Since the Middle Ages, fabricae ecclesiae served to finance the erection and the maintenance of churches. The Church claimed to freely administer these goods, even if lay men often served as administrators. In the 19th century, the Kingdom of Wuerttemberg took over control of these goods and ordered the state municipality, assisted by local clerics, to govern them. In 1887, the king of Wuerttemberg started a process to separate ecclesiastical from secular goods. After WWI, the fabricae ecclesiae in Wuerttemberg were administered entirely by the Catholic Church. This contribution analyses this evolution from three perspectives, namely universal canon law, state law in Wuerttemberg, and particular canon law. It thereby highlights the tension between self-administration and state control of ecclesiastical goods, especially in the 19th century, and points to the fact that even the Catholic Church was part of the secular ruler’s authority over the church.\",\"PeriodicalId\":24010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2022-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte: Kanonistische Abteilung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgk-2022-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国家与教会之间的教会物品管理:19、20世纪符腾堡州的Fabricae Ecclesiae。自中世纪以来,fabricae ecclesiae为教堂的建造和维护提供资金。教会声称可以自由地管理这些物品,即使通常由俗人担任管理者。在19世纪,符腾堡王国接管了这些货物的控制权,并命令州政府在当地神职人员的协助下管理它们。1887年,符腾堡国王开始将教会物品与世俗物品分开。第一次世界大战结束后,符腾堡州的教会完全由天主教会管理。本文从普世教会法、符腾堡州的州法和特殊教会法三个角度分析了这一演变。因此,它突出了自我管理和国家控制教会物品之间的紧张关系,特别是在19世纪,并指出了一个事实,即即使是天主教会也是世俗统治者对教会权威的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pfarrliche Vermögensorganisation zwischen Kirche und Staat: Kirchenpflegen (Kirchenfabriken) in Württemberg im 19. und beginnenden 20. Jahrhundert
Abstract The Administration of Ecclesiastical Goods between State and Church: Fabricae Ecclesiae in Wuerttemberg in the 19th and 20th centuries. Since the Middle Ages, fabricae ecclesiae served to finance the erection and the maintenance of churches. The Church claimed to freely administer these goods, even if lay men often served as administrators. In the 19th century, the Kingdom of Wuerttemberg took over control of these goods and ordered the state municipality, assisted by local clerics, to govern them. In 1887, the king of Wuerttemberg started a process to separate ecclesiastical from secular goods. After WWI, the fabricae ecclesiae in Wuerttemberg were administered entirely by the Catholic Church. This contribution analyses this evolution from three perspectives, namely universal canon law, state law in Wuerttemberg, and particular canon law. It thereby highlights the tension between self-administration and state control of ecclesiastical goods, especially in the 19th century, and points to the fact that even the Catholic Church was part of the secular ruler’s authority over the church.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leitung, Recht und Arbeit in der Kirche. Beiträge zur Geschichte und Gegenwart des evangelischen Kirchenrechts und des Religionsverfassungsrechts, Detlev W. Belling zu Ehren, hg. v. Christian Nottmeier/Martin Richter/Thorsten Ingo Schmidt (= Schriften zum Staatskirchenrecht 62) Martin Krutzler, Der Gewissenstäter im kanonischen Recht. Das kirchliche Sanktionsrecht im Lichte der Glaubens- und Gewissensfreiheit (= Kanonistische Studien und Texte 70) Acta Cusana, Quellen zur Lebensgeschichte des Nikolaus von Kues, Bd. III Lieferung 1: 1458 Oktober 1 bis 1459 Dezember 31, hg. von Johannes Helmrath/ Thomas Woelki David Scherf, Gesetz und Evangelium im Nachkriegsprotestantismus. Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel von Ernst Wolf, Helmut Thielicke und Carl Heinz Ratschow (= Religion in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 5) Central Courts in Early Modern Europe and the Americas, hg. v. A.M. Godfrey/C.H. van Rhee (= Comparative Studies in Continental and Anglo-American Legal History 34)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1