一万诫2021:联邦监管国家的年度快照

C. Crews Jr.
{"title":"一万诫2021:联邦监管国家的年度快照","authors":"C. Crews Jr.","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3877388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ten Thousand Commandments 2021 surveys the size, scope, and cost of federal regulation and intervention and effects on consumers, businesses, and the U.S. economy at large and otherwise attempts to shine a light on the under-appreciated “hidden tax” of America’s regulatory state. The new edition takes pains to bookend the four years of the Trump administration, documenting in detail the good (\"one-in, two-out,\" etc.) and bad (trade, antitrust, price controls, AI, leave policy, \"space force,\" etc.) from a classical liberal or ordered laissez-faire perspective. It also addresses regulation subtracted and added due to the Covid-19 virus. *Agencies’ stated priorities and “inventories” of rules were warning signs for Trump’s deregulatory agenda all along. While the Trump administration claimed to have met internal goals of implementing a “one-in, two-out” process for federal regulations and freezing costs, the longer horizon signaled agencies poised to reverse course and to issue substantially more regulatory actions than deregulatory ones. That impulse to regulation is unencumbered under Biden’s new executive directives to agencies.Federal government spending, deficits, and the national debt are staggering, but so is the impact of federal regulations. Unfortunately, the financial impact of these rules gets little attention in policy debates because, unlike spending and taxes, they are unbudgeted and impossible to quantify, a condition discussed in detail in the report. That circumstance is the reason cost-benefit analysis (little of which exists regardless) and administrative state excesses must be replaced with congressional accountability for regulatory lawmaking. Steps for more review, transparency, and accountability for new and existing federal regulations are also detailedHighlights from the 2021 edition include:* Apart from sector-specific executive orders and memoranda, the report details seven prominent ways the Trump administration streamlined regulation. Among them, and bookending four years of “one-in, two- out” for federal regulatory actions as prescribed by his Executive Order 13771, “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs,” the claimed FY 2020 \"out/in\" ratio was 3.2 to 1 (and 1.3 to 1 if only significant deregulatory actions were counted).* President Trump’s unique regulatory streamlining was offset by his own actions and favorable comments or lob bying for regulatory intervention in the following areas:--Antitrust--Hospital and pharmaceutical price transparency mandates and price controls--Speech and social media content regulation--Private sector privacy regs, encryption, and algorithm regulation--Gov't threats to privacy: amplified databases, biometrics, and surveillance--Online taxes (which are regulatory)--Bipartisan large-scale infrastructure spending with regulatory effects--Trade restrictions--Farm bill and agricultural intervention--Subsidies with regulatory effects--Telecommunications interventions, including for 5G infrastructure--Personal liberties incursions: health tracking, vaping, supplements, and firearms--Financial regulation--Industrial policy in frontier sectors, such as scientific research, artificial intelligence, and the creation of the Space Force--Novel welfare and labor regulations--COVID-related regulation as opposed to deregulation* Given the limited available federal government data and reports, and contemporary studies—and the federal government’s failure to provide a required regularly updated estimate of the aggregate costs of regulation—this report maintains a placeholder for regulatory compliance and effects of federal intervention of $2 trillion annually. It does so for purposes of context and rudimentary comparison with federal spending, debt, GDP, household budgets and other economic metrics. For example, the regulatory hidden “tax” rivals federal individual and corporate income tax receipts combined, whi h totaled $2.076 trillion in 2020 ($1.812 trillion in individual income tax revenues and $264 billion in corporate income tax revenues). Regulatory costs rival corporate pretax profits of $2.237 trillion. Alongside, the report also outlines the vast sweep of intervention and policies for which costs are disregarded and unfathomed.* Calendar year 2020 concluded with 3,353 final rules in the Federal Register, up from 2019’s 2,964 final rules, which was the lowest count since records began being kept in the 1970s and is the only ever tally below 3,000. (In the 1990s and early 2000s, rule counts regularly exceeded 4,000 annually.) An additional 202 Trump administration rules were added between New Year’s Day and Inauguration Day 2021.* During calendar year 2020, while agencies issued those 3,353 rules (some of them deregulatory), Congress enacted “only” 178 laws. Thus, agencies is- sued 19 rules for every law enacted by Congress. This “Unconstitutionality Index”—the ratio of regulations issued by agencies to laws passed by Congress and signed by the president—highlights the entrenched delegation of lawmaking power to unelected agency officials. The average ratio for the previous decade was 28.* In 2017, Trump’s first year, the Fed- eral Register finished at 61,308 pages, the lowest count since 1993 and a 36 percent drop from President Barack Obama’s 95,894 pages, which had been the highest level in history. The 2020 Federal Register tally rose to 86,356 pages, which is the second-highest count ever. However, Trump’s rollbacks of rules—and historically there are still fewer rules overall—also necessarily added to rather than subtract from the Register.* Alongside the 3,353 rules finalized in calendar year 2020, there is also the flow in the pipeline itself to consider. According to the fall 2020 Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions, 69 federal departments, agencies, and commissions had 3,852 regulatory actions in the pipeline at various stages of implementation (recently completed, active, and long- term stages). Of the 3,852 rules, 653 had been deemed “Deregulatory” via Trump’s now-defunct Executive Order 13771, This designation has vanished under Biden. Of the 3,852 regulations in the Agenda’s pipeline (completed, active, and long- term stages), 261 were “economically significant” rules, which the federal government describes as having annual economic effects of $100 million or more. Of those 261 rules, 36 were deemed deregulatory for purposes of Trump’s now-cancelled Executive Order 13771.Since 1993, when the first edition of Ten Thousand Commandments was published, agencies have issued 111,065 rules. Since the Federal Register first began itemizing them in 1976, 208,155 final rules have been issued.","PeriodicalId":11797,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Regulation (IO) (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten Thousand Commandments 2021: An Annual Snapshot of the Federal Regulatory State\",\"authors\":\"C. Crews Jr.\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3877388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ten Thousand Commandments 2021 surveys the size, scope, and cost of federal regulation and intervention and effects on consumers, businesses, and the U.S. economy at large and otherwise attempts to shine a light on the under-appreciated “hidden tax” of America’s regulatory state. The new edition takes pains to bookend the four years of the Trump administration, documenting in detail the good (\\\"one-in, two-out,\\\" etc.) and bad (trade, antitrust, price controls, AI, leave policy, \\\"space force,\\\" etc.) from a classical liberal or ordered laissez-faire perspective. It also addresses regulation subtracted and added due to the Covid-19 virus. *Agencies’ stated priorities and “inventories” of rules were warning signs for Trump’s deregulatory agenda all along. While the Trump administration claimed to have met internal goals of implementing a “one-in, two-out” process for federal regulations and freezing costs, the longer horizon signaled agencies poised to reverse course and to issue substantially more regulatory actions than deregulatory ones. That impulse to regulation is unencumbered under Biden’s new executive directives to agencies.Federal government spending, deficits, and the national debt are staggering, but so is the impact of federal regulations. Unfortunately, the financial impact of these rules gets little attention in policy debates because, unlike spending and taxes, they are unbudgeted and impossible to quantify, a condition discussed in detail in the report. That circumstance is the reason cost-benefit analysis (little of which exists regardless) and administrative state excesses must be replaced with congressional accountability for regulatory lawmaking. Steps for more review, transparency, and accountability for new and existing federal regulations are also detailedHighlights from the 2021 edition include:* Apart from sector-specific executive orders and memoranda, the report details seven prominent ways the Trump administration streamlined regulation. Among them, and bookending four years of “one-in, two- out” for federal regulatory actions as prescribed by his Executive Order 13771, “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs,” the claimed FY 2020 \\\"out/in\\\" ratio was 3.2 to 1 (and 1.3 to 1 if only significant deregulatory actions were counted).* President Trump’s unique regulatory streamlining was offset by his own actions and favorable comments or lob bying for regulatory intervention in the following areas:--Antitrust--Hospital and pharmaceutical price transparency mandates and price controls--Speech and social media content regulation--Private sector privacy regs, encryption, and algorithm regulation--Gov't threats to privacy: amplified databases, biometrics, and surveillance--Online taxes (which are regulatory)--Bipartisan large-scale infrastructure spending with regulatory effects--Trade restrictions--Farm bill and agricultural intervention--Subsidies with regulatory effects--Telecommunications interventions, including for 5G infrastructure--Personal liberties incursions: health tracking, vaping, supplements, and firearms--Financial regulation--Industrial policy in frontier sectors, such as scientific research, artificial intelligence, and the creation of the Space Force--Novel welfare and labor regulations--COVID-related regulation as opposed to deregulation* Given the limited available federal government data and reports, and contemporary studies—and the federal government’s failure to provide a required regularly updated estimate of the aggregate costs of regulation—this report maintains a placeholder for regulatory compliance and effects of federal intervention of $2 trillion annually. It does so for purposes of context and rudimentary comparison with federal spending, debt, GDP, household budgets and other economic metrics. For example, the regulatory hidden “tax” rivals federal individual and corporate income tax receipts combined, whi h totaled $2.076 trillion in 2020 ($1.812 trillion in individual income tax revenues and $264 billion in corporate income tax revenues). Regulatory costs rival corporate pretax profits of $2.237 trillion. Alongside, the report also outlines the vast sweep of intervention and policies for which costs are disregarded and unfathomed.* Calendar year 2020 concluded with 3,353 final rules in the Federal Register, up from 2019’s 2,964 final rules, which was the lowest count since records began being kept in the 1970s and is the only ever tally below 3,000. (In the 1990s and early 2000s, rule counts regularly exceeded 4,000 annually.) An additional 202 Trump administration rules were added between New Year’s Day and Inauguration Day 2021.* During calendar year 2020, while agencies issued those 3,353 rules (some of them deregulatory), Congress enacted “only” 178 laws. Thus, agencies is- sued 19 rules for every law enacted by Congress. This “Unconstitutionality Index”—the ratio of regulations issued by agencies to laws passed by Congress and signed by the president—highlights the entrenched delegation of lawmaking power to unelected agency officials. The average ratio for the previous decade was 28.* In 2017, Trump’s first year, the Fed- eral Register finished at 61,308 pages, the lowest count since 1993 and a 36 percent drop from President Barack Obama’s 95,894 pages, which had been the highest level in history. The 2020 Federal Register tally rose to 86,356 pages, which is the second-highest count ever. However, Trump’s rollbacks of rules—and historically there are still fewer rules overall—also necessarily added to rather than subtract from the Register.* Alongside the 3,353 rules finalized in calendar year 2020, there is also the flow in the pipeline itself to consider. According to the fall 2020 Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions, 69 federal departments, agencies, and commissions had 3,852 regulatory actions in the pipeline at various stages of implementation (recently completed, active, and long- term stages). Of the 3,852 rules, 653 had been deemed “Deregulatory” via Trump’s now-defunct Executive Order 13771, This designation has vanished under Biden. Of the 3,852 regulations in the Agenda’s pipeline (completed, active, and long- term stages), 261 were “economically significant” rules, which the federal government describes as having annual economic effects of $100 million or more. Of those 261 rules, 36 were deemed deregulatory for purposes of Trump’s now-cancelled Executive Order 13771.Since 1993, when the first edition of Ten Thousand Commandments was published, agencies have issued 111,065 rules. Since the Federal Register first began itemizing them in 1976, 208,155 final rules have been issued.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Regulation (IO) (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Regulation (IO) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3877388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Regulation (IO) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3877388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

这种“违宪指数”——由政府机构发布的法规与国会通过并由总统签署的法律之比——凸显了立法权根深蒂固地委托给非选举产生的政府机构官员。过去十年的平均比率是28。* 2017年是特朗普执政的第一年,《联邦公报》的页数为61308页,是1993年以来的最低水平,比贝拉克·奥巴马总统的95894页(历史最高水平)下降了36%。2020年《联邦公报》的统计数字上升到86356页,这是有史以来第二高的记录。然而,特朗普对规则的回滚——从历史上看,总体上的规则仍然更少——也必然会增加而不是减少登记册。*除了在2020年完成的3353项规则外,还需要考虑管道本身的流量。根据2020年秋季联邦监管和放松监管行动的统一议程,69个联邦部门、机构和委员会在不同的实施阶段(最近完成的、正在进行的和长期的阶段)有3852项监管行动正在进行中。在3852项规定中,有653项是根据特朗普现已失效的13771号行政命令被认定为“放松管制”的,这一规定在拜登执政期间消失了。在“议程”计划中的3852项法规(已完成的、正在实施的和长期阶段的)中,261项是“经济意义重大”的法规,联邦政府将其描述为每年具有1亿美元或更多的经济影响。在这261项规定中,有36项被特朗普现已取消的13771号行政命令视为放松管制。自1993年第一版《万诫》出版以来,各机构已经发布了111,065条规则。自1976年《联邦公报》首次开始逐项列出这些规定以来,已发布了208,155项最终规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ten Thousand Commandments 2021: An Annual Snapshot of the Federal Regulatory State
Ten Thousand Commandments 2021 surveys the size, scope, and cost of federal regulation and intervention and effects on consumers, businesses, and the U.S. economy at large and otherwise attempts to shine a light on the under-appreciated “hidden tax” of America’s regulatory state. The new edition takes pains to bookend the four years of the Trump administration, documenting in detail the good ("one-in, two-out," etc.) and bad (trade, antitrust, price controls, AI, leave policy, "space force," etc.) from a classical liberal or ordered laissez-faire perspective. It also addresses regulation subtracted and added due to the Covid-19 virus. *Agencies’ stated priorities and “inventories” of rules were warning signs for Trump’s deregulatory agenda all along. While the Trump administration claimed to have met internal goals of implementing a “one-in, two-out” process for federal regulations and freezing costs, the longer horizon signaled agencies poised to reverse course and to issue substantially more regulatory actions than deregulatory ones. That impulse to regulation is unencumbered under Biden’s new executive directives to agencies.Federal government spending, deficits, and the national debt are staggering, but so is the impact of federal regulations. Unfortunately, the financial impact of these rules gets little attention in policy debates because, unlike spending and taxes, they are unbudgeted and impossible to quantify, a condition discussed in detail in the report. That circumstance is the reason cost-benefit analysis (little of which exists regardless) and administrative state excesses must be replaced with congressional accountability for regulatory lawmaking. Steps for more review, transparency, and accountability for new and existing federal regulations are also detailedHighlights from the 2021 edition include:* Apart from sector-specific executive orders and memoranda, the report details seven prominent ways the Trump administration streamlined regulation. Among them, and bookending four years of “one-in, two- out” for federal regulatory actions as prescribed by his Executive Order 13771, “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs,” the claimed FY 2020 "out/in" ratio was 3.2 to 1 (and 1.3 to 1 if only significant deregulatory actions were counted).* President Trump’s unique regulatory streamlining was offset by his own actions and favorable comments or lob bying for regulatory intervention in the following areas:--Antitrust--Hospital and pharmaceutical price transparency mandates and price controls--Speech and social media content regulation--Private sector privacy regs, encryption, and algorithm regulation--Gov't threats to privacy: amplified databases, biometrics, and surveillance--Online taxes (which are regulatory)--Bipartisan large-scale infrastructure spending with regulatory effects--Trade restrictions--Farm bill and agricultural intervention--Subsidies with regulatory effects--Telecommunications interventions, including for 5G infrastructure--Personal liberties incursions: health tracking, vaping, supplements, and firearms--Financial regulation--Industrial policy in frontier sectors, such as scientific research, artificial intelligence, and the creation of the Space Force--Novel welfare and labor regulations--COVID-related regulation as opposed to deregulation* Given the limited available federal government data and reports, and contemporary studies—and the federal government’s failure to provide a required regularly updated estimate of the aggregate costs of regulation—this report maintains a placeholder for regulatory compliance and effects of federal intervention of $2 trillion annually. It does so for purposes of context and rudimentary comparison with federal spending, debt, GDP, household budgets and other economic metrics. For example, the regulatory hidden “tax” rivals federal individual and corporate income tax receipts combined, whi h totaled $2.076 trillion in 2020 ($1.812 trillion in individual income tax revenues and $264 billion in corporate income tax revenues). Regulatory costs rival corporate pretax profits of $2.237 trillion. Alongside, the report also outlines the vast sweep of intervention and policies for which costs are disregarded and unfathomed.* Calendar year 2020 concluded with 3,353 final rules in the Federal Register, up from 2019’s 2,964 final rules, which was the lowest count since records began being kept in the 1970s and is the only ever tally below 3,000. (In the 1990s and early 2000s, rule counts regularly exceeded 4,000 annually.) An additional 202 Trump administration rules were added between New Year’s Day and Inauguration Day 2021.* During calendar year 2020, while agencies issued those 3,353 rules (some of them deregulatory), Congress enacted “only” 178 laws. Thus, agencies is- sued 19 rules for every law enacted by Congress. This “Unconstitutionality Index”—the ratio of regulations issued by agencies to laws passed by Congress and signed by the president—highlights the entrenched delegation of lawmaking power to unelected agency officials. The average ratio for the previous decade was 28.* In 2017, Trump’s first year, the Fed- eral Register finished at 61,308 pages, the lowest count since 1993 and a 36 percent drop from President Barack Obama’s 95,894 pages, which had been the highest level in history. The 2020 Federal Register tally rose to 86,356 pages, which is the second-highest count ever. However, Trump’s rollbacks of rules—and historically there are still fewer rules overall—also necessarily added to rather than subtract from the Register.* Alongside the 3,353 rules finalized in calendar year 2020, there is also the flow in the pipeline itself to consider. According to the fall 2020 Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions, 69 federal departments, agencies, and commissions had 3,852 regulatory actions in the pipeline at various stages of implementation (recently completed, active, and long- term stages). Of the 3,852 rules, 653 had been deemed “Deregulatory” via Trump’s now-defunct Executive Order 13771, This designation has vanished under Biden. Of the 3,852 regulations in the Agenda’s pipeline (completed, active, and long- term stages), 261 were “economically significant” rules, which the federal government describes as having annual economic effects of $100 million or more. Of those 261 rules, 36 were deemed deregulatory for purposes of Trump’s now-cancelled Executive Order 13771.Since 1993, when the first edition of Ten Thousand Commandments was published, agencies have issued 111,065 rules. Since the Federal Register first began itemizing them in 1976, 208,155 final rules have been issued.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sound GUPPI Safe Harbor: A Calibrated Unilateral Effects Screen for Horizontal Mergers with Differentiated Products Consolidation on Aisle Five: Effects of Mergers in Consumer Packaged Goods Optimal Exit Policy with Uncertain Demand Friends in High Places: Demand Spillovers and Competition on Digital Platforms The Ambiguous Competitive Effects of Passive Partial Forward Integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1