{"title":"磁共振弥散加权成像鉴别完整管壁乳突切除术后复发性胆脂瘤和肉芽组织的可靠性。","authors":"H. Allam, A. A. Abdel Razek, B. Ashraf, M. Khalek","doi":"10.1017/S0022215119002421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo assess the reliability of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating recurrent cholesteatoma from granulation tissue after intact canal wall mastoidectomy.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA prospective study was conducted of 56 consecutive patients with suspected cholesteatoma recurrence after intact canal wall mastoidectomy who underwent diffusion-weighted imaging and delayed contrast magnetic resonance imaging of the temporal bone. The final diagnosis was recurrence in 38 patients and granulation tissue in 18 patients.\n\n\nRESULTS\nCholesteatoma detection on diffusion-weighted imaging based on two sets of readings had sensitivity of 94.7 and 94.7 per cent, specificity of 94.4 and 88.9 per cent, and accuracy of 94.6 and 92.8 per cent, with good intra-observer agreement (Κ = 0.72, p = 0.001). Cholesteatoma detection on delayed contrast magnetic resonance imaging had sensitivity of 81.6 and 78.9 per cent, specificity of 77.8 and 66.7 per cent, and accuracy of 80.4 and 75.0 per cent, with fair intra-observer agreement (Κ = 0.57, p = 0.001). The mean cholesteatoma diameter on diffusion-weighted imaging was 7.7 ± 1.8 and 7.9 ± 1.8 mm, with excellent intra-observer agreement (Κ = 0.994, p = 0.001).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nDiffusion-weighted imaging is a reliable method for differentiating recurrent cholesteatoma and granulation tissue after intact canal wall mastoidectomy.","PeriodicalId":76651,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement","volume":"120 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of recurrent cholesteatoma and granulation tissue after intact canal wall mastoidectomy.\",\"authors\":\"H. Allam, A. A. Abdel Razek, B. Ashraf, M. Khalek\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0022215119002421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nTo assess the reliability of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating recurrent cholesteatoma from granulation tissue after intact canal wall mastoidectomy.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA prospective study was conducted of 56 consecutive patients with suspected cholesteatoma recurrence after intact canal wall mastoidectomy who underwent diffusion-weighted imaging and delayed contrast magnetic resonance imaging of the temporal bone. The final diagnosis was recurrence in 38 patients and granulation tissue in 18 patients.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nCholesteatoma detection on diffusion-weighted imaging based on two sets of readings had sensitivity of 94.7 and 94.7 per cent, specificity of 94.4 and 88.9 per cent, and accuracy of 94.6 and 92.8 per cent, with good intra-observer agreement (Κ = 0.72, p = 0.001). Cholesteatoma detection on delayed contrast magnetic resonance imaging had sensitivity of 81.6 and 78.9 per cent, specificity of 77.8 and 66.7 per cent, and accuracy of 80.4 and 75.0 per cent, with fair intra-observer agreement (Κ = 0.57, p = 0.001). The mean cholesteatoma diameter on diffusion-weighted imaging was 7.7 ± 1.8 and 7.9 ± 1.8 mm, with excellent intra-observer agreement (Κ = 0.994, p = 0.001).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nDiffusion-weighted imaging is a reliable method for differentiating recurrent cholesteatoma and granulation tissue after intact canal wall mastoidectomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215119002421\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of laryngology and otology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215119002421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
目的评价磁共振弥散加权成像鉴别完整乳突管壁切除术后复发性胆脂瘤与肉芽组织的可靠性。方法对56例连续行颞骨弥散加权成像和延迟磁共振成像的怀疑胆脂瘤复发的患者进行前瞻性研究。最终诊断为38例复发,18例出现肉芽组织。结果基于两组读数的扩散加权成像对脂肪瘤的检测灵敏度分别为94.7%和94.7%,特异度分别为94.4%和88.9%,准确率分别为94.6%和92.8%,观察者内一致性较好(Κ = 0.72, p = 0.001)。延迟对比磁共振成像检测胆脂瘤的灵敏度分别为81.6%和78.9%,特异性分别为77.8%和66.7%,准确性分别为80.4%和75.0%,观察者内部一致(Κ = 0.57, p = 0.001)。弥散加权成像显示胆脂瘤平均直径分别为7.7±1.8和7.9±1.8 mm,观察者内一致性极好(Κ = 0.994, p = 0.001)。结论弥散加权成像是鉴别完整管壁乳突切除术后复发性胆脂瘤与肉芽组织的可靠方法。
Reliability of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of recurrent cholesteatoma and granulation tissue after intact canal wall mastoidectomy.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the reliability of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating recurrent cholesteatoma from granulation tissue after intact canal wall mastoidectomy.
METHODS
A prospective study was conducted of 56 consecutive patients with suspected cholesteatoma recurrence after intact canal wall mastoidectomy who underwent diffusion-weighted imaging and delayed contrast magnetic resonance imaging of the temporal bone. The final diagnosis was recurrence in 38 patients and granulation tissue in 18 patients.
RESULTS
Cholesteatoma detection on diffusion-weighted imaging based on two sets of readings had sensitivity of 94.7 and 94.7 per cent, specificity of 94.4 and 88.9 per cent, and accuracy of 94.6 and 92.8 per cent, with good intra-observer agreement (Κ = 0.72, p = 0.001). Cholesteatoma detection on delayed contrast magnetic resonance imaging had sensitivity of 81.6 and 78.9 per cent, specificity of 77.8 and 66.7 per cent, and accuracy of 80.4 and 75.0 per cent, with fair intra-observer agreement (Κ = 0.57, p = 0.001). The mean cholesteatoma diameter on diffusion-weighted imaging was 7.7 ± 1.8 and 7.9 ± 1.8 mm, with excellent intra-observer agreement (Κ = 0.994, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Diffusion-weighted imaging is a reliable method for differentiating recurrent cholesteatoma and granulation tissue after intact canal wall mastoidectomy.