评估医疗急救小组对药物治疗受限患者的激活:一项回顾性队列研究

R. Zibdawi, L. Carroll, R. Gibney, D. Mckinlay, Satbir Kullar, S. Bagshaw
{"title":"评估医疗急救小组对药物治疗受限患者的激活:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"R. Zibdawi, L. Carroll, R. Gibney, D. Mckinlay, Satbir Kullar, S. Bagshaw","doi":"10.1080/24745332.2021.2022549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Rationale: Utilization of the medical emergency team (MET) and associated outcomes in patients with limitations-of-medical-therapy (LOMT) are not well understood. Objectives: We aimed to describe and compare characteristics and outcomes following MET activation in patients with and without LOMT. Methods, Measurements and Main Results: Retrospective cohort study of 2,118 adult in-patients with a MET activation between January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2015, at the University of Alberta Hospital in Edmonton, Canada. There were 2,703 MET activations in 2,118 patients. Four hundred sixty-one patients (21%) had LOMT at the time of MET activation. Of these, 268 (58%) died in-hospital, 40% within 24 hours of their last MET activation. Compared to patients with no LOMT, patients with LOMT were older (78 vs. 63 years; p < 0.001), more likely to be female (48% vs. 42%; p < 0.01), had a higher comorbidity index score (6 vs. 5; p < 0.001) and more often admitted to a medical service (66% vs. 45%; p < 0.001). A LOMT was associated with 3.49 greater odds (95% CI: 2.79- 4.36) of in-hospital mortality following MET activation. Conclusions: MET activations in hospitalized patients with preexisting LOMT are common. The findings suggest greater need for understanding the role of MET services for patients with LOMT, particularly nearing end-of-life. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/24745332.2021.2022549","PeriodicalId":9471,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine","volume":"71 1","pages":"291 - 297"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of medical emergency team activations in patients with limitations-of-medical-therapy: A retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"R. Zibdawi, L. Carroll, R. Gibney, D. Mckinlay, Satbir Kullar, S. Bagshaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24745332.2021.2022549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Rationale: Utilization of the medical emergency team (MET) and associated outcomes in patients with limitations-of-medical-therapy (LOMT) are not well understood. Objectives: We aimed to describe and compare characteristics and outcomes following MET activation in patients with and without LOMT. Methods, Measurements and Main Results: Retrospective cohort study of 2,118 adult in-patients with a MET activation between January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2015, at the University of Alberta Hospital in Edmonton, Canada. There were 2,703 MET activations in 2,118 patients. Four hundred sixty-one patients (21%) had LOMT at the time of MET activation. Of these, 268 (58%) died in-hospital, 40% within 24 hours of their last MET activation. Compared to patients with no LOMT, patients with LOMT were older (78 vs. 63 years; p < 0.001), more likely to be female (48% vs. 42%; p < 0.01), had a higher comorbidity index score (6 vs. 5; p < 0.001) and more often admitted to a medical service (66% vs. 45%; p < 0.001). A LOMT was associated with 3.49 greater odds (95% CI: 2.79- 4.36) of in-hospital mortality following MET activation. Conclusions: MET activations in hospitalized patients with preexisting LOMT are common. The findings suggest greater need for understanding the role of MET services for patients with LOMT, particularly nearing end-of-life. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/24745332.2021.2022549\",\"PeriodicalId\":9471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"291 - 297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24745332.2021.2022549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24745332.2021.2022549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基本原理:目前尚不清楚医疗急救小组(MET)的使用情况和药物治疗受限(LOMT)患者的相关结局。目的:我们旨在描述和比较LOMT患者和非LOMT患者MET激活后的特征和结果。方法、测量方法和主要结果:回顾性队列研究了2013年1月1日至2015年12月31日期间在加拿大埃德蒙顿阿尔伯塔大学医院接受MET激活治疗的2118名成年住院患者。在2118名患者中有2703个MET激活。461例患者(21%)在MET激活时发生LOMT。其中,268例(58%)在医院死亡,40%在最后一次MET激活后24小时内死亡。与没有LOMT的患者相比,LOMT患者年龄较大(78岁vs. 63岁;P < 0.001),更有可能是女性(48% vs. 42%;P < 0.01),合并症指数评分较高(6比5;P < 0.001),并且更经常接受医疗服务(66%对45%;p < 0.001)。LOMT与MET激活后住院死亡率增加3.49的几率(95% CI: 2.79- 4.36)相关。结论:MET在已有LOMT的住院患者中激活是常见的。研究结果表明,更有必要了解MET服务对LOMT患者的作用,特别是接近生命末期的患者。本文的补充数据可在https://doi.org/10.1080/24745332.2021.2022549上在线获得
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of medical emergency team activations in patients with limitations-of-medical-therapy: A retrospective cohort study
Abstract Rationale: Utilization of the medical emergency team (MET) and associated outcomes in patients with limitations-of-medical-therapy (LOMT) are not well understood. Objectives: We aimed to describe and compare characteristics and outcomes following MET activation in patients with and without LOMT. Methods, Measurements and Main Results: Retrospective cohort study of 2,118 adult in-patients with a MET activation between January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2015, at the University of Alberta Hospital in Edmonton, Canada. There were 2,703 MET activations in 2,118 patients. Four hundred sixty-one patients (21%) had LOMT at the time of MET activation. Of these, 268 (58%) died in-hospital, 40% within 24 hours of their last MET activation. Compared to patients with no LOMT, patients with LOMT were older (78 vs. 63 years; p < 0.001), more likely to be female (48% vs. 42%; p < 0.01), had a higher comorbidity index score (6 vs. 5; p < 0.001) and more often admitted to a medical service (66% vs. 45%; p < 0.001). A LOMT was associated with 3.49 greater odds (95% CI: 2.79- 4.36) of in-hospital mortality following MET activation. Conclusions: MET activations in hospitalized patients with preexisting LOMT are common. The findings suggest greater need for understanding the role of MET services for patients with LOMT, particularly nearing end-of-life. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/24745332.2021.2022549
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness of triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate compared with dual therapy for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Canada Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and HIV: A case report Effect of geographical distance on repeat pleural procedures in patients managed by indwelling pleural catheters: A retrospective cohort study Medical industry contributions to the climate crisis: Behind the green drapes Chapitre 4: Le diagnostic de l’infection tuberculeuse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1