学生对药理学总结性考核客观结构模式的看法

Dolly Asani, Sneha Agravat, Aniljeet Singh
{"title":"学生对药理学总结性考核客观结构模式的看法","authors":"Dolly Asani, Sneha Agravat, Aniljeet Singh","doi":"10.5455/njppp.2023.13.12608202203012022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) is globally implemented and beneficial system that is utilized for assessing students in practical examination. It is used to assess the competency based on objective testing through direct observation. It comprised several “Stations,” in which examinees are expected to perform variety of practical tasks within specified time period against criteria formulated to practical skill, thus demonstrating competency of skills or attitude. OSPE is very useful to evaluate their ability to obtain or interpret data, solve the problem, teach, and communicate. Aims and Objectives: The primary objective is to obtain student’s perception toward OSPE and study the effectiveness of OSPE as a tool for summative assessment also quality care assurance of OSPE. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out in January 2022 at our institute. A total 197 students were enrolled after obtaining verbal consent for summative assessment (University Exam). The assessment was carried out for 4 days with different batches per day. Each student attended six different OSPE stations. Data collection was done using a structured questionnaire from students. Perception of students was assessed on the basis of 5-point Likert-scale. Results: Majority of students (82%) agreed that the sequence of stations was appropriate. For instance, they also agreed (82%) that time allotted at stations was adequate. Regarding examination environment, 83% of students agree that it was appropriate for the conduct of exam. Majority (79%) number of students agreed that OSPE helps to evaluate wide range of knowledge. About 81% of students felt that stations covered major competencies. Conclusion: Although OSPE is a laborious and time intensive assessment tool, the present study showed several advantages of OSPE as a structural, organized, and fair assessment method for summative assessment.","PeriodicalId":18969,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology","volume":"2012 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perception of students about objective structured pattern of examination for summative assessment in pharmacology department\",\"authors\":\"Dolly Asani, Sneha Agravat, Aniljeet Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/njppp.2023.13.12608202203012022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) is globally implemented and beneficial system that is utilized for assessing students in practical examination. It is used to assess the competency based on objective testing through direct observation. It comprised several “Stations,” in which examinees are expected to perform variety of practical tasks within specified time period against criteria formulated to practical skill, thus demonstrating competency of skills or attitude. OSPE is very useful to evaluate their ability to obtain or interpret data, solve the problem, teach, and communicate. Aims and Objectives: The primary objective is to obtain student’s perception toward OSPE and study the effectiveness of OSPE as a tool for summative assessment also quality care assurance of OSPE. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out in January 2022 at our institute. A total 197 students were enrolled after obtaining verbal consent for summative assessment (University Exam). The assessment was carried out for 4 days with different batches per day. Each student attended six different OSPE stations. Data collection was done using a structured questionnaire from students. Perception of students was assessed on the basis of 5-point Likert-scale. Results: Majority of students (82%) agreed that the sequence of stations was appropriate. For instance, they also agreed (82%) that time allotted at stations was adequate. Regarding examination environment, 83% of students agree that it was appropriate for the conduct of exam. Majority (79%) number of students agreed that OSPE helps to evaluate wide range of knowledge. About 81% of students felt that stations covered major competencies. Conclusion: Although OSPE is a laborious and time intensive assessment tool, the present study showed several advantages of OSPE as a structural, organized, and fair assessment method for summative assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"2012 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2023.13.12608202203012022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/njppp.2023.13.12608202203012022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的结构化实践考试(OSPE)是在全球范围内实施的一种对学生实践考试进行评估的有益制度。它是通过直接观察,在客观测试的基础上对能力进行评估。它由几个“站”组成,在这些“站”中,考生需要在规定的时间内按照制定的实际技能标准执行各种实际任务,从而展示技能或态度的能力。spe对于评估他们获取或解释数据、解决问题、教学和交流的能力非常有用。目的与目标:主要目的是获得学生对spe的认知,研究spe作为总结性评估工具的有效性以及spe的质量护理保障。材料与方法:本研究于2022年1月在我所进行。在获得口头同意后,共招收了197名学生参加总结性评估(大学考试)。试验为期4 d,每天分不同批次进行评估。每个学生都参加了六个不同的OSPE站。数据收集是通过对学生进行结构化问卷调查完成的。学生的认知以5分李克特量表为基础进行评估。结果:大多数学生(82%)认为站位顺序是合适的。例如,他们也同意(82%)在电台分配的时间是足够的。在考试环境方面,83%的学生认为适合考试的进行。大多数学生(79%)认为spe有助于评估广泛的知识。约81%的学生认为电台涵盖了主要能力。结论:虽然OSPE是一种费时费力的评估工具,但本研究显示了OSPE作为一种结构化、有组织、公平的总结性评估方法的几个优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perception of students about objective structured pattern of examination for summative assessment in pharmacology department
Background: Objective Structured Practical Examination (OSPE) is globally implemented and beneficial system that is utilized for assessing students in practical examination. It is used to assess the competency based on objective testing through direct observation. It comprised several “Stations,” in which examinees are expected to perform variety of practical tasks within specified time period against criteria formulated to practical skill, thus demonstrating competency of skills or attitude. OSPE is very useful to evaluate their ability to obtain or interpret data, solve the problem, teach, and communicate. Aims and Objectives: The primary objective is to obtain student’s perception toward OSPE and study the effectiveness of OSPE as a tool for summative assessment also quality care assurance of OSPE. Materials and Methods: The study was carried out in January 2022 at our institute. A total 197 students were enrolled after obtaining verbal consent for summative assessment (University Exam). The assessment was carried out for 4 days with different batches per day. Each student attended six different OSPE stations. Data collection was done using a structured questionnaire from students. Perception of students was assessed on the basis of 5-point Likert-scale. Results: Majority of students (82%) agreed that the sequence of stations was appropriate. For instance, they also agreed (82%) that time allotted at stations was adequate. Regarding examination environment, 83% of students agree that it was appropriate for the conduct of exam. Majority (79%) number of students agreed that OSPE helps to evaluate wide range of knowledge. About 81% of students felt that stations covered major competencies. Conclusion: Although OSPE is a laborious and time intensive assessment tool, the present study showed several advantages of OSPE as a structural, organized, and fair assessment method for summative assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Substance abuse: A survey among medical students of tribal area of Chhattisgarh – A cross-sectional study Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance among 2nd-year medical students: A cross-sectional study Evaluation of ethanolic extract of leaves of Abutilon indicum on carrageenan-induced rat paw edema Students’ reflection on immediate feedback during formative assessment Randomized and controlled trial to determine safety and efficacy of Foley’s catheter and PGE2 gel for induction of labor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1