女性主义引用实践与实践问题

Lori Wright, Neisha Wiley, Elizabeth VanWassenhove, Brandelyn Tosolt, Rae Loftis, M. Hensley
{"title":"女性主义引用实践与实践问题","authors":"Lori Wright, Neisha Wiley, Elizabeth VanWassenhove, Brandelyn Tosolt, Rae Loftis, M. Hensley","doi":"10.1353/wsq.2022.0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article critiques current citational norms and advances feminist citational praxis. Through the process of writing a dissertation collaboratively, we developed our feminist citational praxis. We share the development of our praxis and highlight three problems of practice we have discovered. We reject normative citational rituals and encourage authors to center scholars and scholarship that are often silenced through academic citational exclusion. Intentionally citing Authors of Color, women, trans-gender, and nonbinary scholars as well as disabled authors/authors with disabilities is feminist citational praxis. We ground our feminist citational praxis within the feminist killjoy paradigm and encourage readers to develop their own feminist citational praxis.","PeriodicalId":23857,"journal":{"name":"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly","volume":"4 1","pages":"124 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feminist Citational Praxis and Problems of Practice\",\"authors\":\"Lori Wright, Neisha Wiley, Elizabeth VanWassenhove, Brandelyn Tosolt, Rae Loftis, M. Hensley\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/wsq.2022.0068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article critiques current citational norms and advances feminist citational praxis. Through the process of writing a dissertation collaboratively, we developed our feminist citational praxis. We share the development of our praxis and highlight three problems of practice we have discovered. We reject normative citational rituals and encourage authors to center scholars and scholarship that are often silenced through academic citational exclusion. Intentionally citing Authors of Color, women, trans-gender, and nonbinary scholars as well as disabled authors/authors with disabilities is feminist citational praxis. We ground our feminist citational praxis within the feminist killjoy paradigm and encourage readers to develop their own feminist citational praxis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"124 - 140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2022.0068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wsq: Women's Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wsq.2022.0068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文批判了现行的引用规范,推进了女性主义的引用实践。通过合作撰写论文的过程,我们发展了我们的女权主义引用实践。我们分享了我们的实践发展,并重点介绍了我们发现的三个实践问题。我们拒绝规范的引用仪式,并鼓励作者以学者和奖学金为中心,这些学者和奖学金经常因学术引用排斥而沉默。有意引用有色人种作者、女性、跨性别、非二元性别学者以及残疾作者/残疾作者是女权主义的引用实践。我们将女权主义引用实践建立在女权主义扫兴范式的基础上,并鼓励读者发展自己的女权主义引用实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feminist Citational Praxis and Problems of Practice
Abstract:This article critiques current citational norms and advances feminist citational praxis. Through the process of writing a dissertation collaboratively, we developed our feminist citational praxis. We share the development of our praxis and highlight three problems of practice we have discovered. We reject normative citational rituals and encourage authors to center scholars and scholarship that are often silenced through academic citational exclusion. Intentionally citing Authors of Color, women, trans-gender, and nonbinary scholars as well as disabled authors/authors with disabilities is feminist citational praxis. We ground our feminist citational praxis within the feminist killjoy paradigm and encourage readers to develop their own feminist citational praxis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Political Education "in the Belly of the Monster": The Third World Women's Alliance's "Tuesday Schedule" Queering Morales v. Turman: Gender, Sexuality, and Juveniles' Right to Treatment "We Wanted to Talk Plumbing": Organizing and Mutual Aid in Baltimore's High-Rise Public Housing Uncertainty as Statecraft: Family Movements Contesting Disappearance Selections from Triple Jeopardy 1, no. 1 (September-October 1971)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1