预防抗生素在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的作用

A. Elsaady
{"title":"预防抗生素在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的作用","authors":"A. Elsaady","doi":"10.26420/AUSTINJRADIOL.2019.1173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most common abdominal surgical procedures all over the world. It carries a lot of advantages over the open procedure. One of these advantages is the marked decrease in the incidence of surgical site infection. However, no wound is immune and SSI is still present and may be troublesome. The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing or reducing SSI is still a matter of controversy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study is a prospective one that conducted over two years to assess the role of antibiotic prophylaxis and best regimen. Four hundreds and fifty six patients were included which were divided into two large groups; group of simple cholecystectomy and group of risky cholecystectomy .Each group were further subdivided into three groups ; one received no antibiotic at all, the second received single dose of antibiotic, and a third one received antibiotic for at least five days. Sixteen cases developed SSI in the whole study (approximately 3.5%). Group of simple cholecystectomy reported three cases (~1%) suffered from SSI with insignificant value between the three groups. On the other hand in group B (risky group) , thirteen patients developed surgical site infections (~7%) with high statistical significance between the group where patient did not received antibiotics at all and other two groups received antibiotics. Also significant value was found between the group used single dose antibiotic (group 5) and those with at least five days administration of antibiotics, the latter reported less incidence of SSI. The study concluded that; no role of antibiotic prophylaxis in simple cholecystectomy. On the other hand prophylactic antibiotic is strongly recommended in risky cholecystectomy. It is better to give the antibiotic for at least five days in such risky groups. The presence of immune-comprised state,","PeriodicalId":91056,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of surgery","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy\",\"authors\":\"A. Elsaady\",\"doi\":\"10.26420/AUSTINJRADIOL.2019.1173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most common abdominal surgical procedures all over the world. It carries a lot of advantages over the open procedure. One of these advantages is the marked decrease in the incidence of surgical site infection. However, no wound is immune and SSI is still present and may be troublesome. The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing or reducing SSI is still a matter of controversy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study is a prospective one that conducted over two years to assess the role of antibiotic prophylaxis and best regimen. Four hundreds and fifty six patients were included which were divided into two large groups; group of simple cholecystectomy and group of risky cholecystectomy .Each group were further subdivided into three groups ; one received no antibiotic at all, the second received single dose of antibiotic, and a third one received antibiotic for at least five days. Sixteen cases developed SSI in the whole study (approximately 3.5%). Group of simple cholecystectomy reported three cases (~1%) suffered from SSI with insignificant value between the three groups. On the other hand in group B (risky group) , thirteen patients developed surgical site infections (~7%) with high statistical significance between the group where patient did not received antibiotics at all and other two groups received antibiotics. Also significant value was found between the group used single dose antibiotic (group 5) and those with at least five days administration of antibiotics, the latter reported less incidence of SSI. The study concluded that; no role of antibiotic prophylaxis in simple cholecystectomy. On the other hand prophylactic antibiotic is strongly recommended in risky cholecystectomy. It is better to give the antibiotic for at least five days in such risky groups. The presence of immune-comprised state,\",\"PeriodicalId\":91056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austin journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austin journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26420/AUSTINJRADIOL.2019.1173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/AUSTINJRADIOL.2019.1173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

腹腔镜胆囊切除术是世界上最常见的腹部外科手术之一。它比开放式手术有很多优点。其中一个优点是手术部位感染的发生率显著降低。然而,没有伤口是免疫的,SSI仍然存在,可能会很麻烦。在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中,抗生素预防在预防或减少SSI中的作用仍然是一个有争议的问题。本研究是一项前瞻性研究,为期两年,旨在评估抗生素预防和最佳治疗方案的作用。456名患者被分为两大组;单纯性胆囊切除术组和危险性胆囊切除术组,每组再细分为3组;其中一组完全不使用抗生素,第二组使用单剂量抗生素,第三组使用抗生素至少5天。在整个研究中,16例发生SSI(约3.5%)。单纯性胆囊切除术组发生SSI 3例(约1%),三组间差异无统计学意义。B组(高危组)有13例患者发生手术部位感染(~7%),未使用抗生素组与其他两组之间差异有统计学意义。使用单剂量抗生素的组(第5组)和使用至少5天抗生素的组之间也发现了显著的价值,后者报告的SSI发生率较低。研究得出结论:抗生素预防在单纯性胆囊切除术中的作用。另一方面,在危险胆囊切除术中强烈建议预防性抗生素。在这些高危人群中,最好至少服用5天抗生素。免疫构成状态的存在,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is one of the most common abdominal surgical procedures all over the world. It carries a lot of advantages over the open procedure. One of these advantages is the marked decrease in the incidence of surgical site infection. However, no wound is immune and SSI is still present and may be troublesome. The role of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing or reducing SSI is still a matter of controversy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study is a prospective one that conducted over two years to assess the role of antibiotic prophylaxis and best regimen. Four hundreds and fifty six patients were included which were divided into two large groups; group of simple cholecystectomy and group of risky cholecystectomy .Each group were further subdivided into three groups ; one received no antibiotic at all, the second received single dose of antibiotic, and a third one received antibiotic for at least five days. Sixteen cases developed SSI in the whole study (approximately 3.5%). Group of simple cholecystectomy reported three cases (~1%) suffered from SSI with insignificant value between the three groups. On the other hand in group B (risky group) , thirteen patients developed surgical site infections (~7%) with high statistical significance between the group where patient did not received antibiotics at all and other two groups received antibiotics. Also significant value was found between the group used single dose antibiotic (group 5) and those with at least five days administration of antibiotics, the latter reported less incidence of SSI. The study concluded that; no role of antibiotic prophylaxis in simple cholecystectomy. On the other hand prophylactic antibiotic is strongly recommended in risky cholecystectomy. It is better to give the antibiotic for at least five days in such risky groups. The presence of immune-comprised state,
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Topic - Controlled Drug Release by Excipient Modification: A Review Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Peritoneum: An Unusual Location of A Rare Tumor A Case of Retroperitoneal Panniculitis with Paralytic Ileus Mimiking a High Intestinal Obstruction Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Pancreas with Node Invasion: What to do? A Case Report and Literature Review Management of an Uncommun Giant Ovarian Hydatid Cyst
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1