幼儿教育中的思考、经验和闲暇时间

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Childhood and Philosophy Pub Date : 2020-12-21 DOI:10.12957/CHILDPHILO.2020.53797
G. Venturini, B. Schuler
{"title":"幼儿教育中的思考、经验和闲暇时间","authors":"G. Venturini, B. Schuler","doi":"10.12957/CHILDPHILO.2020.53797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to examine the way that the concepts of thought and interest have been described in the three main documents that currently guide Brazilian Child Education – National Education Guidelines and Bases/1996, National Curriculum Guidelines for Child Education/2010, and National Curriculum Basis/2018 for Child Education – and their implications for relations between childhood and thinking. In order to do that, we have relied on studies in the philosophy of difference, considering authors such as Kohan, Larrosa, López and Ribeiro, among others, to problematize thought as linked to individual interest. We notice how much thought has been regarded as a problem-resolution tool in these documents, following a neoliberal logic that has been increasingly displaced from collective to individualized interest. Furthermore, the whole functioning of a disciplinary society is evident in the documents, as the latter moves towards a performance society, with greater emphasis on assessment practices and records of children’s “production.” We consider, both in the concept of childhood and the concept of experience, the possibility of experiencing other relationships with childhoods and temporalities in  schools, and  the power of both free time and play as open breathing spaces among routines that are both full of compulsory activities and empty of meaning.","PeriodicalId":42107,"journal":{"name":"Childhood and Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"pensamento, experiência e o tempo do ócio na educação infantil\",\"authors\":\"G. Venturini, B. Schuler\",\"doi\":\"10.12957/CHILDPHILO.2020.53797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to examine the way that the concepts of thought and interest have been described in the three main documents that currently guide Brazilian Child Education – National Education Guidelines and Bases/1996, National Curriculum Guidelines for Child Education/2010, and National Curriculum Basis/2018 for Child Education – and their implications for relations between childhood and thinking. In order to do that, we have relied on studies in the philosophy of difference, considering authors such as Kohan, Larrosa, López and Ribeiro, among others, to problematize thought as linked to individual interest. We notice how much thought has been regarded as a problem-resolution tool in these documents, following a neoliberal logic that has been increasingly displaced from collective to individualized interest. Furthermore, the whole functioning of a disciplinary society is evident in the documents, as the latter moves towards a performance society, with greater emphasis on assessment practices and records of children’s “production.” We consider, both in the concept of childhood and the concept of experience, the possibility of experiencing other relationships with childhoods and temporalities in  schools, and  the power of both free time and play as open breathing spaces among routines that are both full of compulsory activities and empty of meaning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Childhood and Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Childhood and Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12957/CHILDPHILO.2020.53797\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childhood and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12957/CHILDPHILO.2020.53797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在研究目前指导巴西儿童教育的三个主要文件(1996年《国家教育指南和基础》、2010年《国家儿童教育课程指南》和2018年《国家儿童教育课程基础》)中描述思想和兴趣概念的方式,以及它们对儿童与思维之间关系的影响。为了做到这一点,我们依靠对差异哲学的研究,考虑到Kohan, Larrosa, López和Ribeiro等作者,将思想与个人兴趣联系起来。我们注意到,在这些文件中,有多少思想被视为解决问题的工具,遵循一种新自由主义的逻辑,这种逻辑已经越来越多地从集体利益转向个人利益。此外,在文件中,纪律社会的整体运作是显而易见的,因为后者向绩效社会转变,更加强调评估实践和记录儿童的“生产”。在童年的概念和经验的概念中,我们都考虑到在学校中体验童年和短暂的其他关系的可能性,以及自由时间和玩耍的力量,它们都是在充满强制性活动和缺乏意义的日常生活中开放的呼吸空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
pensamento, experiência e o tempo do ócio na educação infantil
This paper aims to examine the way that the concepts of thought and interest have been described in the three main documents that currently guide Brazilian Child Education – National Education Guidelines and Bases/1996, National Curriculum Guidelines for Child Education/2010, and National Curriculum Basis/2018 for Child Education – and their implications for relations between childhood and thinking. In order to do that, we have relied on studies in the philosophy of difference, considering authors such as Kohan, Larrosa, López and Ribeiro, among others, to problematize thought as linked to individual interest. We notice how much thought has been regarded as a problem-resolution tool in these documents, following a neoliberal logic that has been increasingly displaced from collective to individualized interest. Furthermore, the whole functioning of a disciplinary society is evident in the documents, as the latter moves towards a performance society, with greater emphasis on assessment practices and records of children’s “production.” We consider, both in the concept of childhood and the concept of experience, the possibility of experiencing other relationships with childhoods and temporalities in  schools, and  the power of both free time and play as open breathing spaces among routines that are both full of compulsory activities and empty of meaning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
reinventando a prática alfabetizadora de paulo freire. uma experiência de alfabetização filosófica em Pau dos Ferros, RN Des-clasificar a Pinocho Cinema dos primeiros tempos, infância e a entrada na linguagem De la Filosofía para Niños indígenas a la Filosofía desde Niños indígenas: una propuesta desde la nosotrificación maya-tojolabal o governo da infância: para uma ontologia histórica do desenvolvimento infantil e a delimitação de modos de ser criança
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1