{"title":"放射学和非放射学轴性脊柱关节炎患者减量或停止生物制剂治疗是否合理? :一项地方队列研究。","authors":"Halil Harman, Nedim Kaban","doi":"10.1007/s00393-022-01226-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We retrospectively determined factors predicting biologic treatment discontinuation or tapering in patients with axSpA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included 63 nonradiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) and 138 radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) patients on biologic treatments for at least 1 year. The biologic dosing intervals were increased in patients who had been in remission for at least 6 months. In patients whose biologic dosing intervals could be increased by 100% for at least 6 months, the agents were stopped at the end of that time. In patients for whom the biologic agents were stopped or tapered, relapse was defined as a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease activity index score > 4 and a CRP level > 10 mg/L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median duration of biologic treatment (all patients) was 2 (1-11) years. Logistic regression analysis did not identify any independent predictor of treatment discontinuation. NSAID use was the only independent predictor of tapering (p = 0.001). The time to relapse after tapering was shorter in patients with r‑axSpA than nr-axSpA (25.97 vs. 39.53 months; p = 0.05). The time to relapse in patients with r‑axSpA was considerably shorter than that in patients with nr-axSpA (5.14 vs. 13 months; p = 0.001). All r‑axSpA patients relapsed over the follow-up period; only 2 nr-axSpA patients did not relapse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most significant independent predictor of relapse was NSAID use during treatment. For axSpA patients in remission, tapering of the biologic dosing intervals is more appropriate than discontinuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18618,"journal":{"name":"Mineralogical Magazine","volume":"1 1","pages":"55-61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is tapering or discontinuation of biologic treatment in patients with radiographic and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis reasonable? : A local cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Halil Harman, Nedim Kaban\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00393-022-01226-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We retrospectively determined factors predicting biologic treatment discontinuation or tapering in patients with axSpA.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included 63 nonradiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) and 138 radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) patients on biologic treatments for at least 1 year. The biologic dosing intervals were increased in patients who had been in remission for at least 6 months. In patients whose biologic dosing intervals could be increased by 100% for at least 6 months, the agents were stopped at the end of that time. In patients for whom the biologic agents were stopped or tapered, relapse was defined as a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease activity index score > 4 and a CRP level > 10 mg/L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median duration of biologic treatment (all patients) was 2 (1-11) years. Logistic regression analysis did not identify any independent predictor of treatment discontinuation. NSAID use was the only independent predictor of tapering (p = 0.001). The time to relapse after tapering was shorter in patients with r‑axSpA than nr-axSpA (25.97 vs. 39.53 months; p = 0.05). The time to relapse in patients with r‑axSpA was considerably shorter than that in patients with nr-axSpA (5.14 vs. 13 months; p = 0.001). All r‑axSpA patients relapsed over the follow-up period; only 2 nr-axSpA patients did not relapse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most significant independent predictor of relapse was NSAID use during treatment. For axSpA patients in remission, tapering of the biologic dosing intervals is more appropriate than discontinuation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mineralogical Magazine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"55-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mineralogical Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-022-01226-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MINERALOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mineralogical Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-022-01226-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MINERALOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is tapering or discontinuation of biologic treatment in patients with radiographic and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis reasonable? : A local cohort study.
Objective: We retrospectively determined factors predicting biologic treatment discontinuation or tapering in patients with axSpA.
Materials and methods: We included 63 nonradiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) and 138 radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) patients on biologic treatments for at least 1 year. The biologic dosing intervals were increased in patients who had been in remission for at least 6 months. In patients whose biologic dosing intervals could be increased by 100% for at least 6 months, the agents were stopped at the end of that time. In patients for whom the biologic agents were stopped or tapered, relapse was defined as a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease activity index score > 4 and a CRP level > 10 mg/L.
Results: The median duration of biologic treatment (all patients) was 2 (1-11) years. Logistic regression analysis did not identify any independent predictor of treatment discontinuation. NSAID use was the only independent predictor of tapering (p = 0.001). The time to relapse after tapering was shorter in patients with r‑axSpA than nr-axSpA (25.97 vs. 39.53 months; p = 0.05). The time to relapse in patients with r‑axSpA was considerably shorter than that in patients with nr-axSpA (5.14 vs. 13 months; p = 0.001). All r‑axSpA patients relapsed over the follow-up period; only 2 nr-axSpA patients did not relapse.
Conclusion: The most significant independent predictor of relapse was NSAID use during treatment. For axSpA patients in remission, tapering of the biologic dosing intervals is more appropriate than discontinuation.
期刊介绍:
Mineralogical Magazine is an international journal of mineral sciences which covers the fields of mineralogy, crystallography, geochemistry, petrology, environmental geology and economic geology. The journal has been published continuously since the founding of the Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland in 1876 and is a leading journal in its field.