空间视角下的价格离散:理论与证据

Michael A. Anderson, K. Schaefer, Stephen L. S. Smith
{"title":"空间视角下的价格离散:理论与证据","authors":"Michael A. Anderson, K. Schaefer, Stephen L. S. Smith","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1275776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We develop a simple Hotelling spatial-trade model of price dispersion to examine how distance-related costs affect price dispersion, and we offer some insights on how such costs may best be inferred from price-dispersion measures. Our theoretical model suggests that measures of price dispersion that are not spatially-informed can mislead researchers into concluding that distance-related costs are small even when such costs are the major determinant of price dispersion. In estimates based on price dispersion across U.S. cities of eleven goods, we find that distance-related costs are large and are indeed under-estimated when inferred from standard, non-spatial, price dispersion measures.","PeriodicalId":14396,"journal":{"name":"International Trade","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Price Dispersion in Spatial Perspective: Theory and Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Michael A. Anderson, K. Schaefer, Stephen L. S. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1275776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We develop a simple Hotelling spatial-trade model of price dispersion to examine how distance-related costs affect price dispersion, and we offer some insights on how such costs may best be inferred from price-dispersion measures. Our theoretical model suggests that measures of price dispersion that are not spatially-informed can mislead researchers into concluding that distance-related costs are small even when such costs are the major determinant of price dispersion. In estimates based on price dispersion across U.S. cities of eleven goods, we find that distance-related costs are large and are indeed under-estimated when inferred from standard, non-spatial, price dispersion measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Trade\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Trade\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1275776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Trade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1275776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们开发了一个简单的价格分散的Hotelling空间-贸易模型来检验与距离相关的成本如何影响价格分散,并就如何从价格分散度量中最好地推断出这些成本提供了一些见解。我们的理论模型表明,没有空间信息的价格离散度量可能会误导研究人员得出与距离相关的成本很小的结论,即使这些成本是价格离散的主要决定因素。在对美国城市中11种商品的价格差异进行估计时,我们发现距离相关的成本很大,而且从标准的、非空间的价格差异度量中推断出来的成本确实被低估了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Price Dispersion in Spatial Perspective: Theory and Evidence
We develop a simple Hotelling spatial-trade model of price dispersion to examine how distance-related costs affect price dispersion, and we offer some insights on how such costs may best be inferred from price-dispersion measures. Our theoretical model suggests that measures of price dispersion that are not spatially-informed can mislead researchers into concluding that distance-related costs are small even when such costs are the major determinant of price dispersion. In estimates based on price dispersion across U.S. cities of eleven goods, we find that distance-related costs are large and are indeed under-estimated when inferred from standard, non-spatial, price dispersion measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Case for Free Trade Gray Areas Developing Countries China Trade Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1