硅酸盐水泥与补充胶凝材料防止碱-硅反应的效果

Krishna Siva Teja Chopperla , Jeremy A. Smith , Jason H. Ideker
{"title":"硅酸盐水泥与补充胶凝材料防止碱-硅反应的效果","authors":"Krishna Siva Teja Chopperla ,&nbsp;Jeremy A. Smith ,&nbsp;Jason H. Ideker","doi":"10.1016/j.cement.2022.100031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper details a study on the efficacy of portland-limestone cements (PLCs) in combination with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) to prevent expansion due to alkali-silica reaction (ASR). The PLCs studied include both interground (10–15% limestone by mass) and interblended (10% limestone by mass) systems. In this study, ASTM Type II/V cements, five different SCMs, two very-highly reactive fine aggregates, and six SCM combinations were investigated. A total of 100 mixtures were assessed using three different accelerated laboratory test methods to investigate if the SCM combinations that are used with OPCs can be utilized as-is, increased, or decreased when used instead with PLCs. The test methods used to evaluate ASR included the Pyrex mortar bar test (PMBT, ASTM C441), the accelerated mortar bar test (AMBT, ASTM C1567), and the miniature concrete prism test (MCPT, AASHTO T 380). The difference in performance between PLCs with SCMs and parent OPCs with SCMs in the MCPT conditions was further evaluated using pore solution alkalinity and electrical resistivity analysis. The efficacy of the SCM combinations to prevent ASR was also evaluated with a pozzolanic reactivity test. The expansion results from the accelerated laboratory test methods revealed that the mixtures with PLCs and SCMs had similar or better overall performance when compared to the mixtures with the parent OPCs and SCMs. It was observed that the particle size of the added limestone in interblended PLC with SCM mixtures could have a significant influence on the ASR expansion that may alter the output of the test (pass/fail). Consequently, the SCM combinations that are used with OPCs can likely be utilized as-is when used with interground PLCs with up to 15% limestone to prevent ASR. The pore solution and bulk electrical resistivity analysis showed that the lower pore solution alkalinity and higher resistance to mass transport are the main contributing factors towards PLCs’ overall improved performance for ASR mitigation in the presence of SCMs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100225,"journal":{"name":"CEMENT","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100031"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666549222000111/pdfft?md5=c38d67f918a1547be2aaa2217548e1af&pid=1-s2.0-S2666549222000111-main.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of portland-limestone cements with supplementary cementitious materials to prevent alkali-silica reaction\",\"authors\":\"Krishna Siva Teja Chopperla ,&nbsp;Jeremy A. Smith ,&nbsp;Jason H. Ideker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cement.2022.100031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper details a study on the efficacy of portland-limestone cements (PLCs) in combination with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) to prevent expansion due to alkali-silica reaction (ASR). The PLCs studied include both interground (10–15% limestone by mass) and interblended (10% limestone by mass) systems. In this study, ASTM Type II/V cements, five different SCMs, two very-highly reactive fine aggregates, and six SCM combinations were investigated. A total of 100 mixtures were assessed using three different accelerated laboratory test methods to investigate if the SCM combinations that are used with OPCs can be utilized as-is, increased, or decreased when used instead with PLCs. The test methods used to evaluate ASR included the Pyrex mortar bar test (PMBT, ASTM C441), the accelerated mortar bar test (AMBT, ASTM C1567), and the miniature concrete prism test (MCPT, AASHTO T 380). The difference in performance between PLCs with SCMs and parent OPCs with SCMs in the MCPT conditions was further evaluated using pore solution alkalinity and electrical resistivity analysis. The efficacy of the SCM combinations to prevent ASR was also evaluated with a pozzolanic reactivity test. The expansion results from the accelerated laboratory test methods revealed that the mixtures with PLCs and SCMs had similar or better overall performance when compared to the mixtures with the parent OPCs and SCMs. It was observed that the particle size of the added limestone in interblended PLC with SCM mixtures could have a significant influence on the ASR expansion that may alter the output of the test (pass/fail). Consequently, the SCM combinations that are used with OPCs can likely be utilized as-is when used with interground PLCs with up to 15% limestone to prevent ASR. The pore solution and bulk electrical resistivity analysis showed that the lower pore solution alkalinity and higher resistance to mass transport are the main contributing factors towards PLCs’ overall improved performance for ASR mitigation in the presence of SCMs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CEMENT\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666549222000111/pdfft?md5=c38d67f918a1547be2aaa2217548e1af&pid=1-s2.0-S2666549222000111-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CEMENT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666549222000111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666549222000111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文详细研究了波特兰-石灰石胶结剂(plc)与补充胶凝材料(SCMs)结合防止碱-硅反应(ASR)引起的膨胀的功效。所研究的plc包括接地(10-15%石灰石质量)和混合(10%石灰石质量)系统。在这项研究中,研究了ASTM II/V型水泥、五种不同的SCM、两种非常高活性的细骨料和六种SCM组合。使用三种不同的加速实验室测试方法评估了总共100种混合物,以调查与OPCs一起使用的SCM组合在与plc一起使用时是否可以原样使用,增加或减少。评估ASR的试验方法包括Pyrex砂浆棒试验(PMBT, ASTM C441)、加速砂浆棒试验(AMBT, ASTM C1567)和微型混凝土棱镜试验(MCPT, AASHTO T 380)。在MCPT条件下,使用孔溶液碱度和电阻率分析进一步评估了带有SCMs的plc和带有SCMs的母OPCs在性能上的差异。用火山灰反应性试验评价了SCM组合预防ASR的效果。加速实验室测试方法的膨胀结果显示,与母体OPCs和SCMs的混合物相比,plc和SCMs的混合物具有相似或更好的整体性能。可以观察到,在PLC和SCM混合料中添加的石灰石的粒度对ASR膨胀有显著影响,这可能会改变测试的输出(通过/不通过)。因此,与opc一起使用的SCM组合可能在与含有高达15%石灰石的接地plc一起使用时原样使用,以防止ASR。孔隙溶液和体电阻率分析表明,在SCMs存在下,较低的孔隙溶液碱度和较高的质量传输阻力是plc总体上改善ASR缓解性能的主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficacy of portland-limestone cements with supplementary cementitious materials to prevent alkali-silica reaction

This paper details a study on the efficacy of portland-limestone cements (PLCs) in combination with supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) to prevent expansion due to alkali-silica reaction (ASR). The PLCs studied include both interground (10–15% limestone by mass) and interblended (10% limestone by mass) systems. In this study, ASTM Type II/V cements, five different SCMs, two very-highly reactive fine aggregates, and six SCM combinations were investigated. A total of 100 mixtures were assessed using three different accelerated laboratory test methods to investigate if the SCM combinations that are used with OPCs can be utilized as-is, increased, or decreased when used instead with PLCs. The test methods used to evaluate ASR included the Pyrex mortar bar test (PMBT, ASTM C441), the accelerated mortar bar test (AMBT, ASTM C1567), and the miniature concrete prism test (MCPT, AASHTO T 380). The difference in performance between PLCs with SCMs and parent OPCs with SCMs in the MCPT conditions was further evaluated using pore solution alkalinity and electrical resistivity analysis. The efficacy of the SCM combinations to prevent ASR was also evaluated with a pozzolanic reactivity test. The expansion results from the accelerated laboratory test methods revealed that the mixtures with PLCs and SCMs had similar or better overall performance when compared to the mixtures with the parent OPCs and SCMs. It was observed that the particle size of the added limestone in interblended PLC with SCM mixtures could have a significant influence on the ASR expansion that may alter the output of the test (pass/fail). Consequently, the SCM combinations that are used with OPCs can likely be utilized as-is when used with interground PLCs with up to 15% limestone to prevent ASR. The pore solution and bulk electrical resistivity analysis showed that the lower pore solution alkalinity and higher resistance to mass transport are the main contributing factors towards PLCs’ overall improved performance for ASR mitigation in the presence of SCMs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Downstream processing of End-of-Life concrete for the recovery of high-quality cementitious fractions The impact of relative humidity on the nanoindentation relaxation in calcium silicate hydrates Low-grade fly ash in portland cement blends: A decoupling approach to evaluate reactivity and hydration effects Accelerating effect of low replacements of carbonaceous materials in cement paste and mortar Measuring concrete air-entraining admixture adsorption on coal ash using three-phase equilibrium and fluorescence-based methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1