分析师覆盖范围和经理人披露前瞻性信息

James Warren
{"title":"分析师覆盖范围和经理人披露前瞻性信息","authors":"James Warren","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3702576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior research documents that managers respond to an exogenous decrease in analyst coverage by increasing the quantity of a specific form of guidance (earnings forecasts), presumably to fill the information void left by a reduction in coverage. I extend this line of research by also considering the change in management forecast quality and an alternative form of guidance, managers’ forward-looking textual disclosures. First, although forecast quantity increases subsequent to loss of coverage and liquidity partially improves, I find forecast quality decreases (i.e., forecasts have larger signed and unsigned errors) and the decrease in quality attenuates the improvement in liquidity. These results suggest analysts not only play an informational role, but also a monitoring role with respect to managers’ forward-looking disclosures. These findings are more pronounced when (1) other monitors are not present to step in (i.e., dedicated intuitional owners and auditors) and (2) managers have incentives to engage in this disclosure behavior (i.e., engage in insider selling). Second, with respect to forward-looking textual disclosures, I find the quantity and net positivity of forward-looking textual disclosures in earnings announcements increase following loss of coverage. These results do not vary with other monitors’ presence, suggesting other parties do not monitor textual disclosures to the same extent as forecasting. However, the increase in net positivity of statements is concentrated in managers who engage in insider selling. Finally, I do not detect an improvement in liquidity from more textual disclosure or an association between net positivity and liquidity. Overall, my study provides a more nuanced view of analysts’ role in influencing firms’ disclosure of forward-looking information.","PeriodicalId":11800,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Stock Market Risk (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyst Coverage and Managers’ Disclosure of Forward-Looking Information\",\"authors\":\"James Warren\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3702576\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prior research documents that managers respond to an exogenous decrease in analyst coverage by increasing the quantity of a specific form of guidance (earnings forecasts), presumably to fill the information void left by a reduction in coverage. I extend this line of research by also considering the change in management forecast quality and an alternative form of guidance, managers’ forward-looking textual disclosures. First, although forecast quantity increases subsequent to loss of coverage and liquidity partially improves, I find forecast quality decreases (i.e., forecasts have larger signed and unsigned errors) and the decrease in quality attenuates the improvement in liquidity. These results suggest analysts not only play an informational role, but also a monitoring role with respect to managers’ forward-looking disclosures. These findings are more pronounced when (1) other monitors are not present to step in (i.e., dedicated intuitional owners and auditors) and (2) managers have incentives to engage in this disclosure behavior (i.e., engage in insider selling). Second, with respect to forward-looking textual disclosures, I find the quantity and net positivity of forward-looking textual disclosures in earnings announcements increase following loss of coverage. These results do not vary with other monitors’ presence, suggesting other parties do not monitor textual disclosures to the same extent as forecasting. However, the increase in net positivity of statements is concentrated in managers who engage in insider selling. Finally, I do not detect an improvement in liquidity from more textual disclosure or an association between net positivity and liquidity. Overall, my study provides a more nuanced view of analysts’ role in influencing firms’ disclosure of forward-looking information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Stock Market Risk (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Stock Market Risk (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3702576\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Stock Market Risk (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3702576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

先前的研究表明,管理者通过增加一种特定形式的指导(收益预测)的数量来应对分析师覆盖率的外生减少,可能是为了填补覆盖率减少留下的信息空白。我通过考虑管理预测质量的变化和另一种指导形式——管理者的前瞻性文本披露,扩展了这条研究线。首先,尽管预测数量会随着覆盖率的减少而增加,流动性也会部分改善,但我发现预测质量会下降(即,预测有较大的签名和未签名错误),而且质量的下降会削弱流动性的改善。这些结果表明,在管理者的前瞻性披露方面,分析师不仅发挥信息作用,而且发挥监督作用。当(1)没有其他监督者介入(即,专门的直觉所有者和审计师)和(2)管理人员有动机参与这种披露行为(即,参与内幕销售)时,这些发现更加明显。其次,关于前瞻性文本披露,我发现收益公告中前瞻性文本披露的数量和净积极性随着覆盖率的减少而增加。这些结果不随其他监督者的存在而变化,这表明其他各方对文本披露的监督程度不如预测。然而,报表净收益的增加主要集中在从事内幕销售的经理人身上。最后,我没有从更多的文本披露或净正性与流动性之间的关联中发现流动性的改善。总体而言,我的研究对分析师在影响公司披露前瞻性信息方面的作用提供了更细致入微的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyst Coverage and Managers’ Disclosure of Forward-Looking Information
Prior research documents that managers respond to an exogenous decrease in analyst coverage by increasing the quantity of a specific form of guidance (earnings forecasts), presumably to fill the information void left by a reduction in coverage. I extend this line of research by also considering the change in management forecast quality and an alternative form of guidance, managers’ forward-looking textual disclosures. First, although forecast quantity increases subsequent to loss of coverage and liquidity partially improves, I find forecast quality decreases (i.e., forecasts have larger signed and unsigned errors) and the decrease in quality attenuates the improvement in liquidity. These results suggest analysts not only play an informational role, but also a monitoring role with respect to managers’ forward-looking disclosures. These findings are more pronounced when (1) other monitors are not present to step in (i.e., dedicated intuitional owners and auditors) and (2) managers have incentives to engage in this disclosure behavior (i.e., engage in insider selling). Second, with respect to forward-looking textual disclosures, I find the quantity and net positivity of forward-looking textual disclosures in earnings announcements increase following loss of coverage. These results do not vary with other monitors’ presence, suggesting other parties do not monitor textual disclosures to the same extent as forecasting. However, the increase in net positivity of statements is concentrated in managers who engage in insider selling. Finally, I do not detect an improvement in liquidity from more textual disclosure or an association between net positivity and liquidity. Overall, my study provides a more nuanced view of analysts’ role in influencing firms’ disclosure of forward-looking information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Risk-Return Tradeoff Among Equity Factors Predictive Regressions under Arbitrary Persistence and Stock Return Predictability News and Trading After Hours High-Frequency Arbitrage and Market Illiquidity President’s Confidence and the Stock Market Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1