聊天机器人之战:Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie等。新一轮人工智能淘金热及其对高等教育的影响

1 Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.23
J. Rudolph, Samson Tan, Shannon Tan
{"title":"聊天机器人之战:Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie等。新一轮人工智能淘金热及其对高等教育的影响","authors":"J. Rudolph, Samson Tan, Shannon Tan","doi":"10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developments in the chatbot space have been accelerating at breakneck speed since late November 2022. Every day, there appears to be a plethora of news. A war of competitor chatbots is raging amidst an AI arms race and gold rush. These rapid developments impact higher education, as millions of students and academics have started using bots like ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Bard, Ernie and others for a large variety of purposes. In this article, we select some of the most promising chatbots in the English and Chinese-language spaces and provide their corporate backgrounds and brief histories. Following an up-to-date review of the Chinese and English-language academic literature, we describe our comparative method and systematically compare selected chatbots across a multi-disciplinary test relevant to higher education. The results of our test show that there are currently no A-students and no B-students in this bot cohort, despite all publicised and sensationalist claims to the contrary. The much-vaunted AI is not yet that intelligent, it would appear. GPT-4 and its predecessor did best, whilst Bing Chat and Bard were akin to at-risk students with F-grade averages. We conclude our article with four types of recommendations for key stakeholders in higher education: (1) faculty in terms of assessment and (2) teaching & learning, (3) students and (4) higher education institutions.","PeriodicalId":6298,"journal":{"name":"1","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education\",\"authors\":\"J. Rudolph, Samson Tan, Shannon Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Developments in the chatbot space have been accelerating at breakneck speed since late November 2022. Every day, there appears to be a plethora of news. A war of competitor chatbots is raging amidst an AI arms race and gold rush. These rapid developments impact higher education, as millions of students and academics have started using bots like ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Bard, Ernie and others for a large variety of purposes. In this article, we select some of the most promising chatbots in the English and Chinese-language spaces and provide their corporate backgrounds and brief histories. Following an up-to-date review of the Chinese and English-language academic literature, we describe our comparative method and systematically compare selected chatbots across a multi-disciplinary test relevant to higher education. The results of our test show that there are currently no A-students and no B-students in this bot cohort, despite all publicised and sensationalist claims to the contrary. The much-vaunted AI is not yet that intelligent, it would appear. GPT-4 and its predecessor did best, whilst Bing Chat and Bard were akin to at-risk students with F-grade averages. We conclude our article with four types of recommendations for key stakeholders in higher education: (1) faculty in terms of assessment and (2) teaching & learning, (3) students and (4) higher education institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"52\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

摘要

自2022年11月下旬以来,聊天机器人领域的发展一直在以惊人的速度加速。每天似乎都有大量的新闻。在人工智能军备竞赛和淘金热中,竞争对手之间的聊天机器人战争正在激烈进行。这些快速发展对高等教育产生了影响,数百万学生和学者开始使用聊天机器人,如ChatGPT、Bing Chat、Bard、Ernie等,用于各种各样的目的。在本文中,我们选择了一些在英语和中文领域最有前途的聊天机器人,并提供了它们的公司背景和简要历史。在对中文和英文学术文献进行最新回顾之后,我们描述了我们的比较方法,并在与高等教育相关的多学科测试中系统地比较了选定的聊天机器人。我们的测试结果显示,目前在这两个队列中没有a级学生,也没有b级学生,尽管所有的宣传和耸人听闻的说法都相反。看起来,被大肆吹嘘的人工智能还没有那么聪明。GPT-4及其前身表现最好,而Bing Chat和Bard则类似于平均成绩为f的高危学生。最后,我们对高等教育的主要利益相关者提出了四种建议:(1)评估方面的教师;(2)教与学;(3)学生;(4)高等教育机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education
Developments in the chatbot space have been accelerating at breakneck speed since late November 2022. Every day, there appears to be a plethora of news. A war of competitor chatbots is raging amidst an AI arms race and gold rush. These rapid developments impact higher education, as millions of students and academics have started using bots like ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Bard, Ernie and others for a large variety of purposes. In this article, we select some of the most promising chatbots in the English and Chinese-language spaces and provide their corporate backgrounds and brief histories. Following an up-to-date review of the Chinese and English-language academic literature, we describe our comparative method and systematically compare selected chatbots across a multi-disciplinary test relevant to higher education. The results of our test show that there are currently no A-students and no B-students in this bot cohort, despite all publicised and sensationalist claims to the contrary. The much-vaunted AI is not yet that intelligent, it would appear. GPT-4 and its predecessor did best, whilst Bing Chat and Bard were akin to at-risk students with F-grade averages. We conclude our article with four types of recommendations for key stakeholders in higher education: (1) faculty in terms of assessment and (2) teaching & learning, (3) students and (4) higher education institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
1
1
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Business Efficiency: The Role of Digital Transfor-mation in Modern Enterprises Evaluating the Websites of Academic Departments Using the GRA Method Alice Walker's Portrayal of inequality and unfair treatment towards Women in the Novel "The Color Purple" Investigation of Machining Parameters for Turning Process Smart Movable Road Divider and Clearance Ambulance Path Management Through IOT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1