{"title":"汽车主动悬架的备选控制律","authors":"C. Yue, T. Butsuen, J. Hedrick","doi":"10.1109/ACC.1988.4173147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A two degree of freedom (1/4 car model) is used to evaluate alternative linear control laws. Control laws considered are full state feedback, sprung mass absolute velocity feedback and an LQG regulator using suspension defelection as the measurement. It is shown that all three can yield improvements to the sprung mass ride quality but that overall the LQG regulator using suspension deflection provides the best trade-off between ride quality, suspension packaging and road holding constraints.","PeriodicalId":6395,"journal":{"name":"1988 American Control Conference","volume":"41 1","pages":"2373-2378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"187","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative Control Laws for Automotive Active Suspensions\",\"authors\":\"C. Yue, T. Butsuen, J. Hedrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACC.1988.4173147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A two degree of freedom (1/4 car model) is used to evaluate alternative linear control laws. Control laws considered are full state feedback, sprung mass absolute velocity feedback and an LQG regulator using suspension defelection as the measurement. It is shown that all three can yield improvements to the sprung mass ride quality but that overall the LQG regulator using suspension deflection provides the best trade-off between ride quality, suspension packaging and road holding constraints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1988 American Control Conference\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"2373-2378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"187\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1988 American Control Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.1988.4173147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1988 American Control Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.1988.4173147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Alternative Control Laws for Automotive Active Suspensions
A two degree of freedom (1/4 car model) is used to evaluate alternative linear control laws. Control laws considered are full state feedback, sprung mass absolute velocity feedback and an LQG regulator using suspension defelection as the measurement. It is shown that all three can yield improvements to the sprung mass ride quality but that overall the LQG regulator using suspension deflection provides the best trade-off between ride quality, suspension packaging and road holding constraints.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
