被模仿者还是变革者所束缚?:考虑其他可能性

Q2 Arts and Humanities Education and Culture Pub Date : 2017-06-21 DOI:10.5703/EDUCATIONCULTURE.33.1.0023
Jeffery M. Frank
{"title":"被模仿者还是变革者所束缚?:考虑其他可能性","authors":"Jeffery M. Frank","doi":"10.5703/EDUCATIONCULTURE.33.1.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Philip Jackson's \"The Mimetic and the Transformative: Alternative Outlooks on Teaching\" is widely read both inside and outside of philosophy of education circles and courses, and is best known for sketching out the long-standing difference between the mimetic and transformative traditions in teaching. In this paper, I argue that we need to move beyond the mimetic/transformative divide to a new tradition of teaching. I make the case that Jackson's understanding of assessment and adaptive education are unduly limiting, and that this keeps his thinking bound to a dualism that needs to be reconstructed. Once reconstructed, new possibilities for philosophers of education, teacher educators, and teachers are disclosed.","PeriodicalId":37095,"journal":{"name":"Education and Culture","volume":"118 1","pages":"23 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bound to the Mimetic or the Transformative?: Considering Other Possibilities\",\"authors\":\"Jeffery M. Frank\",\"doi\":\"10.5703/EDUCATIONCULTURE.33.1.0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Philip Jackson's \\\"The Mimetic and the Transformative: Alternative Outlooks on Teaching\\\" is widely read both inside and outside of philosophy of education circles and courses, and is best known for sketching out the long-standing difference between the mimetic and transformative traditions in teaching. In this paper, I argue that we need to move beyond the mimetic/transformative divide to a new tradition of teaching. I make the case that Jackson's understanding of assessment and adaptive education are unduly limiting, and that this keeps his thinking bound to a dualism that needs to be reconstructed. Once reconstructed, new possibilities for philosophers of education, teacher educators, and teachers are disclosed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Culture\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"23 - 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5703/EDUCATIONCULTURE.33.1.0023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5703/EDUCATIONCULTURE.33.1.0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

菲利普·杰克逊(Philip Jackson)的《模仿与变革:教学的另类观点》在教育哲学圈和课程内外都被广泛阅读,最著名的是勾勒出模仿和变革传统在教学中的长期差异。在本文中,我认为,我们需要超越模仿/变革的鸿沟,以一种新的教学传统。我认为杰克逊对评估和适应性教育的理解过于局限,这使得他的思想被束缚在一个需要重建的二元论上。一旦重建,教育哲学家、教师教育者和教师的新可能性就会显露出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bound to the Mimetic or the Transformative?: Considering Other Possibilities
Philip Jackson's "The Mimetic and the Transformative: Alternative Outlooks on Teaching" is widely read both inside and outside of philosophy of education circles and courses, and is best known for sketching out the long-standing difference between the mimetic and transformative traditions in teaching. In this paper, I argue that we need to move beyond the mimetic/transformative divide to a new tradition of teaching. I make the case that Jackson's understanding of assessment and adaptive education are unduly limiting, and that this keeps his thinking bound to a dualism that needs to be reconstructed. Once reconstructed, new possibilities for philosophers of education, teacher educators, and teachers are disclosed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education and Culture
Education and Culture Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Would Dewey See/Say Now? China’s Promise 1919 to 2019 A View of Democracy in and for China from a Deweyan Perspective What Will Confucius Say to Dewey? The Students’ Experience Evolution in Chinese Schools Educational Promise Amidst Authoritarian Ambition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1