先进荧光检测技术在常规油田和海底油田水垢管理中的应用

S. Heath, S. Toivonen, V. Vuori, Salla Puupponen
{"title":"先进荧光检测技术在常规油田和海底油田水垢管理中的应用","authors":"S. Heath, S. Toivonen, V. Vuori, Salla Puupponen","doi":"10.2118/193632-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Scale inhibitor (SI) analysis is an extremely important part of scale management and, in recent years, much work has been done on the development of specialist scale inhibitor analysis techniques like Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectroscopy (LCMS) to push the boundaries of low level scale inhibitor detection. However, LCMS requires costly and complex instrumentation and there was therefore still a need for the development of other advanced techniques like fluorescence (F) and Time resolved Fluorescence (TRF) that can be used on site to provide near \"on line\" data.\n Fluorescence techniques are particularly suited to tagged polymers and naturally fluorescent molecules like polyamines whereas the operation principle of TRF is based on interactions between lanthanide ions and various functional groups of polymer or phosphonate scale inhibitors.\n Both techniques work individually or in combination and this provides a distinct advantage for multiple scale inhibitor analysis in produced brines that enable the design of packages of different products for specific field applications. In addition, TRF and fluorescence techniques offer the capability of on-site detection compared to the majority of scale inhibitor analysis techniques and other advanced methods like LC-MS.\n The ability to detect both phosphonate and polymeric scale inhibitors at very low MIC (<1ppm) has the potential for significantly extending scale squeeze lifetimes. This has now also allowed highly efficient, F tagged polymers, to be used in field situations where scale squeezing was either stopped or the lifetime was significantly compromised because of the lack of confidence in the residuals analysis.\n Specific field and theoretical examples from both sub-sea and conventional wells will be presented where the application of both advanced fluorescence and TRF techniques has shown significant improvements in scale management.\n This paper will compare and contrast the pros, cons and limitations of both fluorescence and TRF techniques for both phosphonate and polymeric scale inhibitors. In addition, it will highlight examples where scale management significantly improves through the application of Fluorescence and/or TRF scale inhibitor analysis techniques in complex production scenarios.","PeriodicalId":10983,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, April 08, 2019","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Advanced Fluorescence Detection Technology to Improve Scale Management in Both Conventional and Sub-Sea Fields\",\"authors\":\"S. Heath, S. Toivonen, V. Vuori, Salla Puupponen\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/193632-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Scale inhibitor (SI) analysis is an extremely important part of scale management and, in recent years, much work has been done on the development of specialist scale inhibitor analysis techniques like Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectroscopy (LCMS) to push the boundaries of low level scale inhibitor detection. However, LCMS requires costly and complex instrumentation and there was therefore still a need for the development of other advanced techniques like fluorescence (F) and Time resolved Fluorescence (TRF) that can be used on site to provide near \\\"on line\\\" data.\\n Fluorescence techniques are particularly suited to tagged polymers and naturally fluorescent molecules like polyamines whereas the operation principle of TRF is based on interactions between lanthanide ions and various functional groups of polymer or phosphonate scale inhibitors.\\n Both techniques work individually or in combination and this provides a distinct advantage for multiple scale inhibitor analysis in produced brines that enable the design of packages of different products for specific field applications. In addition, TRF and fluorescence techniques offer the capability of on-site detection compared to the majority of scale inhibitor analysis techniques and other advanced methods like LC-MS.\\n The ability to detect both phosphonate and polymeric scale inhibitors at very low MIC (<1ppm) has the potential for significantly extending scale squeeze lifetimes. This has now also allowed highly efficient, F tagged polymers, to be used in field situations where scale squeezing was either stopped or the lifetime was significantly compromised because of the lack of confidence in the residuals analysis.\\n Specific field and theoretical examples from both sub-sea and conventional wells will be presented where the application of both advanced fluorescence and TRF techniques has shown significant improvements in scale management.\\n This paper will compare and contrast the pros, cons and limitations of both fluorescence and TRF techniques for both phosphonate and polymeric scale inhibitors. In addition, it will highlight examples where scale management significantly improves through the application of Fluorescence and/or TRF scale inhibitor analysis techniques in complex production scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Mon, April 08, 2019\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Mon, April 08, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/193632-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, April 08, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/193632-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

阻垢剂(SI)分析是水垢管理的重要组成部分,近年来,人们在开发专业的阻垢剂分析技术(如液相色谱-质谱法(LCMS))方面做了大量工作,以推动低水平阻垢剂检测的界限。然而,LCMS需要昂贵和复杂的仪器,因此仍然需要开发其他先进技术,如荧光(F)和时间分辨荧光(TRF),这些技术可以在现场使用,以提供接近“在线”的数据。荧光技术特别适用于标记聚合物和天然荧光分子,如多胺,而TRF的工作原理是基于镧系离子与聚合物或磷酸盐阻垢剂的各种官能团之间的相互作用。这两种技术可以单独使用,也可以结合使用,这为生产盐水中的多种阻垢剂分析提供了明显的优势,可以针对特定的现场应用设计不同产品的包装。此外,与大多数阻垢剂分析技术和LC-MS等其他先进方法相比,TRF和荧光技术提供了现场检测的能力。在非常低的MIC (<1ppm)下检测磷酸盐和聚合物阻垢剂的能力有可能显著延长阻垢剂的使用寿命。这也使得高效的F标记聚合物可以用于现场情况,在这些情况下,由于对残差分析缺乏信心,尺度挤压要么被停止,要么寿命受到严重损害。将介绍海底井和常规井的具体现场和理论实例,其中先进荧光技术和TRF技术的应用在结垢管理方面取得了重大进展。本文将比较和对比荧光和TRF技术对膦酸盐和聚合物阻垢剂的优缺点和局限性。此外,它还将重点介绍通过在复杂生产场景中应用荧光和/或TRF阻垢剂分析技术显著改善结垢管理的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of Advanced Fluorescence Detection Technology to Improve Scale Management in Both Conventional and Sub-Sea Fields
Scale inhibitor (SI) analysis is an extremely important part of scale management and, in recent years, much work has been done on the development of specialist scale inhibitor analysis techniques like Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectroscopy (LCMS) to push the boundaries of low level scale inhibitor detection. However, LCMS requires costly and complex instrumentation and there was therefore still a need for the development of other advanced techniques like fluorescence (F) and Time resolved Fluorescence (TRF) that can be used on site to provide near "on line" data. Fluorescence techniques are particularly suited to tagged polymers and naturally fluorescent molecules like polyamines whereas the operation principle of TRF is based on interactions between lanthanide ions and various functional groups of polymer or phosphonate scale inhibitors. Both techniques work individually or in combination and this provides a distinct advantage for multiple scale inhibitor analysis in produced brines that enable the design of packages of different products for specific field applications. In addition, TRF and fluorescence techniques offer the capability of on-site detection compared to the majority of scale inhibitor analysis techniques and other advanced methods like LC-MS. The ability to detect both phosphonate and polymeric scale inhibitors at very low MIC (<1ppm) has the potential for significantly extending scale squeeze lifetimes. This has now also allowed highly efficient, F tagged polymers, to be used in field situations where scale squeezing was either stopped or the lifetime was significantly compromised because of the lack of confidence in the residuals analysis. Specific field and theoretical examples from both sub-sea and conventional wells will be presented where the application of both advanced fluorescence and TRF techniques has shown significant improvements in scale management. This paper will compare and contrast the pros, cons and limitations of both fluorescence and TRF techniques for both phosphonate and polymeric scale inhibitors. In addition, it will highlight examples where scale management significantly improves through the application of Fluorescence and/or TRF scale inhibitor analysis techniques in complex production scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Molecular cloning and expression analysis of a stress-responsive WRKY transcription factor gene, BnWRKY57, from Brassica napus Effect of calcium, BAP and putrescine on somatic embryo induction in juvenile explants of Eucalyptus grandis × E. urophylla hybrids Screening of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) varieties for resistance to Curvularia leaf spot disease Identification of sources of resistance to damping-off (Rhizoctonia solani) in two phenological phases of watermelon Use of different doses of glyphosate to control invasive plants: Bidens pilosa, Commelina benghalensis, Digitaria insularis, Ipomoea grandiofolia and Tridax procumbens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1