C. Wüstenhagen, C. Domnick, K. John, M. Bruschewski, S. Grundmann
{"title":"叶片内冷却流的MRV测量及与实验数据匹配的CFD验证","authors":"C. Wüstenhagen, C. Domnick, K. John, M. Bruschewski, S. Grundmann","doi":"10.1115/1.4062556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The optimal Reynolds-Averaged-Navier Stokes (RANS) turbulence model to be used in a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation varies depending on the application. Conventionally, the model is selected from benchmark tests and experience, but its performance is difficult to predict. For this reason, this study presents a cost-effective CFD validation routine, which uses three-dimensional experimental velocity data obtained in replicas of the specific flow system. Magnetic Resonance Velocimetry (MRV) is used as the measurement technique. Since the objective is only the validation of the turbulence model, the experiment and the simulation are performed with simplified flow conditions, hence, stationary iso-thermal iso-volumetric flow without inertial forces. The routine applies a data matching routine to align the two three-dimensional data sets before they are interpolated on a common grid. Various error metrics are presented, which provide the degree of the CFD modelling error and indicate its source. For demonstration, the validation routine is used to evaluate RANS-CFD results of a three-pass internal cooling system of a high-pressure turbine airfoil used in a small industrial gas turbine. The simulations are performed with the eddy-viscosity based turbulence model k-w SST and the Reynolds-Stress SSG, and BSL-EARSM turbulence models. The results indicate strong local errors in the examined turbulence models. None of the models performed well enough, underlining that every RANS-CFD application needs to be validated.","PeriodicalId":17404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRV Measurements of Internal Blade Cooling Flow and CFD Validation by Data Matching with the Experimental Data\",\"authors\":\"C. Wüstenhagen, C. Domnick, K. John, M. Bruschewski, S. Grundmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4062556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The optimal Reynolds-Averaged-Navier Stokes (RANS) turbulence model to be used in a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation varies depending on the application. Conventionally, the model is selected from benchmark tests and experience, but its performance is difficult to predict. For this reason, this study presents a cost-effective CFD validation routine, which uses three-dimensional experimental velocity data obtained in replicas of the specific flow system. Magnetic Resonance Velocimetry (MRV) is used as the measurement technique. Since the objective is only the validation of the turbulence model, the experiment and the simulation are performed with simplified flow conditions, hence, stationary iso-thermal iso-volumetric flow without inertial forces. The routine applies a data matching routine to align the two three-dimensional data sets before they are interpolated on a common grid. Various error metrics are presented, which provide the degree of the CFD modelling error and indicate its source. For demonstration, the validation routine is used to evaluate RANS-CFD results of a three-pass internal cooling system of a high-pressure turbine airfoil used in a small industrial gas turbine. The simulations are performed with the eddy-viscosity based turbulence model k-w SST and the Reynolds-Stress SSG, and BSL-EARSM turbulence models. The results indicate strong local errors in the examined turbulence models. None of the models performed well enough, underlining that every RANS-CFD application needs to be validated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4062556\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4062556","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
MRV Measurements of Internal Blade Cooling Flow and CFD Validation by Data Matching with the Experimental Data
The optimal Reynolds-Averaged-Navier Stokes (RANS) turbulence model to be used in a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation varies depending on the application. Conventionally, the model is selected from benchmark tests and experience, but its performance is difficult to predict. For this reason, this study presents a cost-effective CFD validation routine, which uses three-dimensional experimental velocity data obtained in replicas of the specific flow system. Magnetic Resonance Velocimetry (MRV) is used as the measurement technique. Since the objective is only the validation of the turbulence model, the experiment and the simulation are performed with simplified flow conditions, hence, stationary iso-thermal iso-volumetric flow without inertial forces. The routine applies a data matching routine to align the two three-dimensional data sets before they are interpolated on a common grid. Various error metrics are presented, which provide the degree of the CFD modelling error and indicate its source. For demonstration, the validation routine is used to evaluate RANS-CFD results of a three-pass internal cooling system of a high-pressure turbine airfoil used in a small industrial gas turbine. The simulations are performed with the eddy-viscosity based turbulence model k-w SST and the Reynolds-Stress SSG, and BSL-EARSM turbulence models. The results indicate strong local errors in the examined turbulence models. None of the models performed well enough, underlining that every RANS-CFD application needs to be validated.
期刊介绍:
Applications in: Aerospace systems; Gas turbines; Biotechnology; Defense systems; Electronic and photonic equipment; Energy systems; Manufacturing; Refrigeration and air conditioning; Homeland security systems; Micro- and nanoscale devices; Petrochemical processing; Medical systems; Energy efficiency; Sustainability; Solar systems; Combustion systems