孟加拉国沿海社区对气候变化的适应能力:研究差距和未来方向

Muhammad Ziaul Hoque , Shenghui Cui , Xu Lilai , Imranul Islam , Ghaffar Ali , Jianxiong Tang
{"title":"孟加拉国沿海社区对气候变化的适应能力:研究差距和未来方向","authors":"Muhammad Ziaul Hoque ,&nbsp;Shenghui Cui ,&nbsp;Xu Lilai ,&nbsp;Imranul Islam ,&nbsp;Ghaffar Ali ,&nbsp;Jianxiong Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.wsee.2019.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The assessment of resilience for people, places, and systems to climate-change hazards is essential for understanding how to reduce disaster risks. Globally, a number of resilience assessment methodologies have been developed and implemented by a variety of entities, including national and local organizations, donor agencies, and academic researchers. In Bangladesh, although a number of resilience studies have been conducted, it has never been determined whether these assessments rightfully addressed conceptual understanding, methodological approaches, and disciplinary underpinnings, and maintained compliance with on-going research communications standards. To unpack this gap, we systematically reviewed 38 articles to characterize how the resilience to climate change, of coastal communities in Bangladesh, is being assessed. To operationalize the study, we have presented a brief overview of the assessment tools and then applied an analytical framework containing six criteria: comprehensiveness of dimensions, scalar relationships, temporal dynamism, addressing uncertainties of climate change by modeling and scenario-making, participatory approaches, and action plans. The overview analysis shows diverse traditions of methodological underpinnings, and reveals authors' often incomplete conceptual understandings of resilience. Results of the review analysis reveal extensive inadequacy regarding multiple dimensionality, scalar and temporal scales, and more importantly, addressing the uncertainty of climate change. In relation to comprehensiveness, current literature has failed to consistently comply with global research communication in regard to the criteria of institutional and infrastructural dimensions. More attention needs to be placed on temporal and scalar dynamics. Most importantly, the uncertainty issue is virtually overlooked in the literature, and iterative processes and the development of alternate states of planning through scenario analysis are also critical, for risk reduction and adaptation to climate-change impacts. Substantial emphasis should be given to include all possible stakeholders in the planning and implementation of any climate-change adaptation or mitigation program.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101280,"journal":{"name":"Watershed Ecology and the Environment","volume":"1 ","pages":"Pages 42-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wsee.2019.10.001","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resilience of coastal communities to climate change in Bangladesh: Research gaps and future directions\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Ziaul Hoque ,&nbsp;Shenghui Cui ,&nbsp;Xu Lilai ,&nbsp;Imranul Islam ,&nbsp;Ghaffar Ali ,&nbsp;Jianxiong Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wsee.2019.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The assessment of resilience for people, places, and systems to climate-change hazards is essential for understanding how to reduce disaster risks. Globally, a number of resilience assessment methodologies have been developed and implemented by a variety of entities, including national and local organizations, donor agencies, and academic researchers. In Bangladesh, although a number of resilience studies have been conducted, it has never been determined whether these assessments rightfully addressed conceptual understanding, methodological approaches, and disciplinary underpinnings, and maintained compliance with on-going research communications standards. To unpack this gap, we systematically reviewed 38 articles to characterize how the resilience to climate change, of coastal communities in Bangladesh, is being assessed. To operationalize the study, we have presented a brief overview of the assessment tools and then applied an analytical framework containing six criteria: comprehensiveness of dimensions, scalar relationships, temporal dynamism, addressing uncertainties of climate change by modeling and scenario-making, participatory approaches, and action plans. The overview analysis shows diverse traditions of methodological underpinnings, and reveals authors' often incomplete conceptual understandings of resilience. Results of the review analysis reveal extensive inadequacy regarding multiple dimensionality, scalar and temporal scales, and more importantly, addressing the uncertainty of climate change. In relation to comprehensiveness, current literature has failed to consistently comply with global research communication in regard to the criteria of institutional and infrastructural dimensions. More attention needs to be placed on temporal and scalar dynamics. Most importantly, the uncertainty issue is virtually overlooked in the literature, and iterative processes and the development of alternate states of planning through scenario analysis are also critical, for risk reduction and adaptation to climate-change impacts. Substantial emphasis should be given to include all possible stakeholders in the planning and implementation of any climate-change adaptation or mitigation program.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Watershed Ecology and the Environment\",\"volume\":\"1 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 42-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wsee.2019.10.001\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Watershed Ecology and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589471418300196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Watershed Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589471418300196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

评估人员、地点和系统对气候变化灾害的适应能力对于了解如何减少灾害风险至关重要。在全球范围内,包括国家和地方组织、捐助机构和学术研究人员在内的各种实体已经开发并实施了一些复原力评估方法。在孟加拉国,虽然进行了一些恢复力研究,但从未确定这些评估是否正确地处理了概念理解、方法方法和学科基础,并保持符合正在进行的研究沟通标准。为了解开这一差距,我们系统地回顾了38篇文章,以描述如何评估孟加拉国沿海社区对气候变化的适应能力。为了使这项研究可操作性,我们简要概述了评估工具,然后应用了一个包含六个标准的分析框架:维度的全面性、标量关系、时间动态、通过建模和情景制作解决气候变化的不确定性、参与性方法和行动计划。概述分析显示了方法论基础的不同传统,并揭示了作者对弹性的概念理解往往不完整。回顾分析的结果表明,在多维度、标量和时间尺度上,更重要的是,在解决气候变化的不确定性方面,存在广泛的不足。就全面性而言,目前的文献在制度和基础设施维度的标准方面未能始终符合全球研究交流。需要更多地关注时间和标量动力学。最重要的是,不确定性问题在文献中几乎被忽视了,通过情景分析的迭代过程和规划的替代状态的发展对于降低风险和适应气候变化的影响也至关重要。在规划和执行任何气候变化适应或缓解方案时,应特别强调将所有可能的利益攸关方包括在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Resilience of coastal communities to climate change in Bangladesh: Research gaps and future directions

The assessment of resilience for people, places, and systems to climate-change hazards is essential for understanding how to reduce disaster risks. Globally, a number of resilience assessment methodologies have been developed and implemented by a variety of entities, including national and local organizations, donor agencies, and academic researchers. In Bangladesh, although a number of resilience studies have been conducted, it has never been determined whether these assessments rightfully addressed conceptual understanding, methodological approaches, and disciplinary underpinnings, and maintained compliance with on-going research communications standards. To unpack this gap, we systematically reviewed 38 articles to characterize how the resilience to climate change, of coastal communities in Bangladesh, is being assessed. To operationalize the study, we have presented a brief overview of the assessment tools and then applied an analytical framework containing six criteria: comprehensiveness of dimensions, scalar relationships, temporal dynamism, addressing uncertainties of climate change by modeling and scenario-making, participatory approaches, and action plans. The overview analysis shows diverse traditions of methodological underpinnings, and reveals authors' often incomplete conceptual understandings of resilience. Results of the review analysis reveal extensive inadequacy regarding multiple dimensionality, scalar and temporal scales, and more importantly, addressing the uncertainty of climate change. In relation to comprehensiveness, current literature has failed to consistently comply with global research communication in regard to the criteria of institutional and infrastructural dimensions. More attention needs to be placed on temporal and scalar dynamics. Most importantly, the uncertainty issue is virtually overlooked in the literature, and iterative processes and the development of alternate states of planning through scenario analysis are also critical, for risk reduction and adaptation to climate-change impacts. Substantial emphasis should be given to include all possible stakeholders in the planning and implementation of any climate-change adaptation or mitigation program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Simulation of wetland vegetation succession based on coupled Gaussian and population dynamics models: A case study of Poyang Lake wetlands Morphometric analysis of watersheds: A comprehensive review of data sources, quality, and geospatial techniques Flash flood susceptibility mapping of north-east depression of Bangladesh using different GIS based bivariate statistical models Source, fate, toxicity, and remediation of micro-plastic in wetlands: A critical review Effects of Spartina alterniflora control on soil carbon and nitrogen in coastal wetlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1