社会制造:从理论到实践

IF 1.9 Q3 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.14488/bjopm.2021.047
Renata Mariani Zanella, E. Frazzon, Iracyanne Retto Uhlmann
{"title":"社会制造:从理论到实践","authors":"Renata Mariani Zanella, E. Frazzon, Iracyanne Retto Uhlmann","doi":"10.14488/bjopm.2021.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Goal: This scientific research article focuses on understanding the new manufacturing paradigm of Industry 4.0 called social manufacturing. The study aims to consolidate the concept of social manufacturing by characterizing and evaluating its theoretical potential, identifying its main practical trends, and correlating its state-of-the-art with its state-of-the-practice. Design / Methodology / Approach: The first step was the consolidation of the concept of social manufacturing through bibliographic analysis. Then, real-world cases were identified and classified under the optics of social manufacturing to define the current practice. Lastly, confronting the concept of social manufacturing with existing methods depicted a clear panorama, including academic and practical opportunities. Results: The results show a trend towards social manufacturing. New challenges, including the COVID-19 pandemic, are pushing forward social collaboration initiatives related to manufacturing. The most advanced conceptualized stage occurs theoretically, as mass individualization is still not a reality. New scenarios of limited resources and challenging environments such as the COVID-19 pandemic will impose the broader dissemination and application of mass customization concepts, practices, and tools. Limitation of the investigation: This research only considered articles published in English. Practices were analyzed using third-party content available. Practical implications: New scenarios of limited resources and challenging environments such as the COVID-19 pandemic impose the broader dissemination and application of mass customization concepts, practices, and tools. Originality / Value: The term social manufacturing in the literature has yet to be consolidated. In addition, no comparison between theory and practice was available.","PeriodicalId":54139,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Manufacturing: from the theory to the practice\",\"authors\":\"Renata Mariani Zanella, E. Frazzon, Iracyanne Retto Uhlmann\",\"doi\":\"10.14488/bjopm.2021.047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Goal: This scientific research article focuses on understanding the new manufacturing paradigm of Industry 4.0 called social manufacturing. The study aims to consolidate the concept of social manufacturing by characterizing and evaluating its theoretical potential, identifying its main practical trends, and correlating its state-of-the-art with its state-of-the-practice. Design / Methodology / Approach: The first step was the consolidation of the concept of social manufacturing through bibliographic analysis. Then, real-world cases were identified and classified under the optics of social manufacturing to define the current practice. Lastly, confronting the concept of social manufacturing with existing methods depicted a clear panorama, including academic and practical opportunities. Results: The results show a trend towards social manufacturing. New challenges, including the COVID-19 pandemic, are pushing forward social collaboration initiatives related to manufacturing. The most advanced conceptualized stage occurs theoretically, as mass individualization is still not a reality. New scenarios of limited resources and challenging environments such as the COVID-19 pandemic will impose the broader dissemination and application of mass customization concepts, practices, and tools. Limitation of the investigation: This research only considered articles published in English. Practices were analyzed using third-party content available. Practical implications: New scenarios of limited resources and challenging environments such as the COVID-19 pandemic impose the broader dissemination and application of mass customization concepts, practices, and tools. Originality / Value: The term social manufacturing in the literature has yet to be consolidated. In addition, no comparison between theory and practice was available.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14488/bjopm.2021.047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14488/bjopm.2021.047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:这篇科研文章的重点是理解工业4.0的新制造范式,即社会制造。该研究旨在通过描述和评估其理论潜力,确定其主要实践趋势,并将其最先进的技术与最先进的实践相关联,巩固社会制造的概念。设计/方法/途径:第一步是通过书目分析巩固社会制造的概念。然后,在社会制造的视野下,对现实案例进行识别和分类,以定义当前的实践。最后,面对社会制造的概念与现有的方法描绘了一个清晰的全景,包括学术和实践的机会。结果:结果显示了社会化制造的趋势。包括COVID-19大流行在内的新挑战正在推动与制造业相关的社会协作举措。最先进的概念化阶段发生在理论上,因为大规模个性化仍未实现。COVID-19大流行等资源有限和环境具有挑战性的新情况将迫使大规模定制概念、实践和工具得到更广泛的传播和应用。调查的局限性:本研究只考虑了用英语发表的文章。使用可用的第三方内容分析实践。实际影响:资源有限和具有挑战性的环境(如COVID-19大流行)的新情景要求大规模定制概念、实践和工具得到更广泛的传播和应用。原创性/价值:社会制造这一术语在文献中还有待巩固。此外,理论与实践之间也没有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social Manufacturing: from the theory to the practice
Goal: This scientific research article focuses on understanding the new manufacturing paradigm of Industry 4.0 called social manufacturing. The study aims to consolidate the concept of social manufacturing by characterizing and evaluating its theoretical potential, identifying its main practical trends, and correlating its state-of-the-art with its state-of-the-practice. Design / Methodology / Approach: The first step was the consolidation of the concept of social manufacturing through bibliographic analysis. Then, real-world cases were identified and classified under the optics of social manufacturing to define the current practice. Lastly, confronting the concept of social manufacturing with existing methods depicted a clear panorama, including academic and practical opportunities. Results: The results show a trend towards social manufacturing. New challenges, including the COVID-19 pandemic, are pushing forward social collaboration initiatives related to manufacturing. The most advanced conceptualized stage occurs theoretically, as mass individualization is still not a reality. New scenarios of limited resources and challenging environments such as the COVID-19 pandemic will impose the broader dissemination and application of mass customization concepts, practices, and tools. Limitation of the investigation: This research only considered articles published in English. Practices were analyzed using third-party content available. Practical implications: New scenarios of limited resources and challenging environments such as the COVID-19 pandemic impose the broader dissemination and application of mass customization concepts, practices, and tools. Originality / Value: The term social manufacturing in the literature has yet to be consolidated. In addition, no comparison between theory and practice was available.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sustainability and Operational Excellence opportunities with Industry 4.0, Lean and Circular Economy Analysis of the application of recycled polypropylene Productivity in a pandemic Analysis of product-service system logistics strategies in e-commerce An ERP implementation on a beekeeping and honey value chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1