担忧、风险感知、信息寻求经历和对错误信息的信任对COVID-19事实核查的影响:一项在中国进行的调查研究

IF 2.1 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Chinese Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2022-09-12 DOI:10.1080/17544750.2022.2121931
Shaohai Jiang, Piper Liping Liu, Annabel Ngien, Qiaofei Wu
{"title":"担忧、风险感知、信息寻求经历和对错误信息的信任对COVID-19事实核查的影响:一项在中国进行的调查研究","authors":"Shaohai Jiang, Piper Liping Liu, Annabel Ngien, Qiaofei Wu","doi":"10.1080/17544750.2022.2121931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Health misinformation is a serious problem that can cause confusion and risk-taking behaviors, undermining public health efforts. Fact-checking has been highlighted as an effective tool for coping with the challenge of misinformation. However, few studies have examined the factors influencing individuals’ health fact-checking behaviors. Using the comprehensive model of information seeking, we conducted a two-wave panel survey in China during the COVID-19 pandemic and explored the underlying process that might hinder COVID-19 fact-checking. The results showed that risk perception and worry about COVID-19 triggered a negative COVID-19 information-seeking experience, which reduced COVID-19 fact-checking. Moreover, the propensity to trust COVID-19 misinformation played a moderating role, such that negative information-seeking experience had a stronger negative effect on fact-checking behaviors for people with a greater propensity to trust misinformation. This study demonstrates the dark side of cognitive and affective responses to risks and health information-seeking experiences. The findings offer important implications for future health communication initiatives to effectively promote health fact-checking behaviors.","PeriodicalId":46367,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Communication","volume":"128 1","pages":"132 - 149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of worry, risk perception, information-seeking experience, and trust in misinformation on COVID-19 fact-checking: a survey study in China\",\"authors\":\"Shaohai Jiang, Piper Liping Liu, Annabel Ngien, Qiaofei Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17544750.2022.2121931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Health misinformation is a serious problem that can cause confusion and risk-taking behaviors, undermining public health efforts. Fact-checking has been highlighted as an effective tool for coping with the challenge of misinformation. However, few studies have examined the factors influencing individuals’ health fact-checking behaviors. Using the comprehensive model of information seeking, we conducted a two-wave panel survey in China during the COVID-19 pandemic and explored the underlying process that might hinder COVID-19 fact-checking. The results showed that risk perception and worry about COVID-19 triggered a negative COVID-19 information-seeking experience, which reduced COVID-19 fact-checking. Moreover, the propensity to trust COVID-19 misinformation played a moderating role, such that negative information-seeking experience had a stronger negative effect on fact-checking behaviors for people with a greater propensity to trust misinformation. This study demonstrates the dark side of cognitive and affective responses to risks and health information-seeking experiences. The findings offer important implications for future health communication initiatives to effectively promote health fact-checking behaviors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"128 1\",\"pages\":\"132 - 149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2022.2121931\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2022.2121931","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫生错误信息是一个严重的问题,它可能导致混乱和冒险行为,破坏公共卫生努力。事实核查已被强调为应对错误信息挑战的有效工具。然而,很少有研究调查影响个人健康事实核查行为的因素。利用信息寻求综合模型,我们在新冠肺炎大流行期间在中国进行了两波面板调查,探讨了可能阻碍新冠肺炎事实核查的潜在过程。结果表明,对COVID-19的风险认知和担忧引发了负面的COVID-19信息寻求体验,从而减少了COVID-19事实核查。此外,对COVID-19错误信息的信任倾向发挥了调节作用,对于更倾向于信任错误信息的人来说,消极的信息寻求经历对事实核查行为的负面影响更强。本研究展示了对风险和健康信息寻求经验的认知和情感反应的阴暗面。该研究结果对未来有效促进健康事实核查行为的健康传播倡议具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of worry, risk perception, information-seeking experience, and trust in misinformation on COVID-19 fact-checking: a survey study in China
Abstract Health misinformation is a serious problem that can cause confusion and risk-taking behaviors, undermining public health efforts. Fact-checking has been highlighted as an effective tool for coping with the challenge of misinformation. However, few studies have examined the factors influencing individuals’ health fact-checking behaviors. Using the comprehensive model of information seeking, we conducted a two-wave panel survey in China during the COVID-19 pandemic and explored the underlying process that might hinder COVID-19 fact-checking. The results showed that risk perception and worry about COVID-19 triggered a negative COVID-19 information-seeking experience, which reduced COVID-19 fact-checking. Moreover, the propensity to trust COVID-19 misinformation played a moderating role, such that negative information-seeking experience had a stronger negative effect on fact-checking behaviors for people with a greater propensity to trust misinformation. This study demonstrates the dark side of cognitive and affective responses to risks and health information-seeking experiences. The findings offer important implications for future health communication initiatives to effectively promote health fact-checking behaviors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
How do corporate social responsibility perceptions facilitate advocacy behavior? The roles of organizational pride and responsible leadership Exploring freedom in mobile connectivity: a moderated mediation model linking mobile social media modes, availability pressure, and media habits Communicating LGBTQ-supportive CSR for corporate legitimacy: a cultural discourse analysis in Hong Kong Pro-liberalism vs. Nationalism: how critical opinion leaders challenge the persuasive effect of propaganda in China When politics meets dating: how moral concern, utopianism, and communication competence predict willingness to date across the political divide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1