文献收藏主题的可视化——历史学家解读过程分析

Anastasia Christoforidis, Ben Heuwing, Thomas Mandl
{"title":"文献收藏主题的可视化——历史学家解读过程分析","authors":"Anastasia Christoforidis, Ben Heuwing, Thomas Mandl","doi":"10.18452/1444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses two multivariate visualisations which provide insights into topic model distributions across sub-collections of a collection of historical textbooks in the context of a digital humanities project. Results of a qualitative user study with experts in historical research indicate that network graphs are more appropriate for revealing general connections among subcollections, while small-multiples of heatmaps of topic correlations are more suitable for a finer grained analysis of the connections between specific topics. We analyse the user behaviour during analysis to identify general activities of the interpretation of topic models as well as activities of interpreting visual elements that are specific to each visualisation. As a result, we observed usability problems and show potential for improved visualisations in digital humanities applications.","PeriodicalId":90875,"journal":{"name":"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","volume":"25 1","pages":"37-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visualising Topics in Document Collections - An Analysis of the Interpretation Processes of Historians\",\"authors\":\"Anastasia Christoforidis, Ben Heuwing, Thomas Mandl\",\"doi\":\"10.18452/1444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses two multivariate visualisations which provide insights into topic model distributions across sub-collections of a collection of historical textbooks in the context of a digital humanities project. Results of a qualitative user study with experts in historical research indicate that network graphs are more appropriate for revealing general connections among subcollections, while small-multiples of heatmaps of topic correlations are more suitable for a finer grained analysis of the connections between specific topics. We analyse the user behaviour during analysis to identify general activities of the interpretation of topic models as well as activities of interpreting visual elements that are specific to each visualisation. As a result, we observed usability problems and show potential for improved visualisations in digital humanities applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"37-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18452/1444\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISI ... : ... IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18452/1444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了两个多元可视化,它们提供了对数字人文项目背景下历史教科书集合的子集合的主题模型分布的见解。与历史研究专家进行的定性用户研究的结果表明,网络图更适合揭示子集合之间的一般联系,而主题相关性的小倍数热图更适合对特定主题之间的联系进行更细粒度的分析。我们在分析过程中分析用户行为,以确定主题模型解释的一般活动以及解释特定于每个可视化的视觉元素的活动。因此,我们观察到可用性问题,并展示了在数字人文应用中改进可视化的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Visualising Topics in Document Collections - An Analysis of the Interpretation Processes of Historians
This paper discusses two multivariate visualisations which provide insights into topic model distributions across sub-collections of a collection of historical textbooks in the context of a digital humanities project. Results of a qualitative user study with experts in historical research indicate that network graphs are more appropriate for revealing general connections among subcollections, while small-multiples of heatmaps of topic correlations are more suitable for a finer grained analysis of the connections between specific topics. We analyse the user behaviour during analysis to identify general activities of the interpretation of topic models as well as activities of interpreting visual elements that are specific to each visualisation. As a result, we observed usability problems and show potential for improved visualisations in digital humanities applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Open Practices of Early Career Researchers: A Qualitative Study on Research and Teaching Behavior Design and Development of an Emoji Sentiment Lexicon Does the General Public Share Research on Twitter? A Case Study on the Online Conversation about the Search for a Nuclear Repository in Germany Vom Datenkatalog zum Wissensgraph - Forschungsdaten im konzeptuellen Modell von FRBR Omission of Information: Identifying Political Slant via an Analysis of Co-occurring Entities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1