评估情境化内容和语言综合学习材料在高等教育水平

IF 0.2 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated-LACLIL Pub Date : 2019-04-10 DOI:10.5294/LACLIL.2018.11.2.4
Wen-hsien Yang
{"title":"评估情境化内容和语言综合学习材料在高等教育水平","authors":"Wen-hsien Yang","doi":"10.5294/LACLIL.2018.11.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluacion de materiales de aprendizaje integrado de contenidos y lenguas extranjeras contextualizados a nivel de educacion superior Avaliacao de materiais de aprendizagem integrada de conteudos e linguas estrangeiras contextualizados a nivel de ensino superior The Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approach has been broadly adopted and extensively researched at different educational levels across European contexts. It is also becoming popular in Asian settings due to its dual focus on developing both language skills and content knowledge. It aims to empower learners with high mobility and employability in the globalized job market. However, successful implementation of CLIL in these countries has been difficult for various reasons, including lack of suitable CLIL-based curricular materials. This study reports how an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) teacher, who is also a CLIL practitioner, worked collaboratively with an English learner who has professional, industrial internship experience, to produce contextualized CLIL learning materials for tertiary education. It also examines to what extent the self-designed CLIL materials satisfy standards of good quality. In total, 47 English-major first-year students joined the study in a national polytechnic university in Taiwan. The results reveal that CLIL learners have a fairly high expectation of quality materials, and our design received 5%–25% lower agreement than the criteria. Moreover, learners’ gender, language proficiency and previous secondary school major were factors that affected how they perceive the criteria of quality and our own CLIL materials. This demonstrates complexities of designing CLIL-based curricular materials addressing learners’ individual differences (especially in terms of needs and expectations) in a polytechnic university with pedagogic implications. To reference this article (APA) / Para citar este articulo (APA) / Para citar este artigo (APA) Yang, W. (2018). Evaluating Contextualized Content and Language Integrated Learning Materials at Tertiary Level. LACLIL, 11 (2), 236-274. DOI: 10.5294/laclil.2018.11.2.4 Received: 11/09/2018 Apporved: 30/11/2018","PeriodicalId":43989,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated-LACLIL","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Contextualized Content and Language Integrated Learning Materials at Tertiary Level\",\"authors\":\"Wen-hsien Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.5294/LACLIL.2018.11.2.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evaluacion de materiales de aprendizaje integrado de contenidos y lenguas extranjeras contextualizados a nivel de educacion superior Avaliacao de materiais de aprendizagem integrada de conteudos e linguas estrangeiras contextualizados a nivel de ensino superior The Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approach has been broadly adopted and extensively researched at different educational levels across European contexts. It is also becoming popular in Asian settings due to its dual focus on developing both language skills and content knowledge. It aims to empower learners with high mobility and employability in the globalized job market. However, successful implementation of CLIL in these countries has been difficult for various reasons, including lack of suitable CLIL-based curricular materials. This study reports how an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) teacher, who is also a CLIL practitioner, worked collaboratively with an English learner who has professional, industrial internship experience, to produce contextualized CLIL learning materials for tertiary education. It also examines to what extent the self-designed CLIL materials satisfy standards of good quality. In total, 47 English-major first-year students joined the study in a national polytechnic university in Taiwan. The results reveal that CLIL learners have a fairly high expectation of quality materials, and our design received 5%–25% lower agreement than the criteria. Moreover, learners’ gender, language proficiency and previous secondary school major were factors that affected how they perceive the criteria of quality and our own CLIL materials. This demonstrates complexities of designing CLIL-based curricular materials addressing learners’ individual differences (especially in terms of needs and expectations) in a polytechnic university with pedagogic implications. To reference this article (APA) / Para citar este articulo (APA) / Para citar este artigo (APA) Yang, W. (2018). Evaluating Contextualized Content and Language Integrated Learning Materials at Tertiary Level. LACLIL, 11 (2), 236-274. DOI: 10.5294/laclil.2018.11.2.4 Received: 11/09/2018 Apporved: 30/11/2018\",\"PeriodicalId\":43989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated-LACLIL\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated-LACLIL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5294/LACLIL.2018.11.2.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated-LACLIL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5294/LACLIL.2018.11.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

内容与语言综合学习(CLIL)方法在欧洲各国的不同教育水平上得到了广泛采用和广泛研究。它在亚洲也越来越受欢迎,因为它的双重重点是培养语言技能和内容知识。它旨在增强学习者在全球化就业市场中的流动性和就业能力。然而,由于各种原因,包括缺乏合适的基于CLIL的课程材料,CLIL在这些国家的成功实施一直很困难。本研究报告了一名特殊用途英语(ESP)教师(同时也是CLIL实践者)如何与一名具有专业、工业实习经验的英语学习者合作,为高等教育制作情境化的CLIL学习材料。并考察了自行设计的CLIL材料在多大程度上满足良好的质量标准。共有47名英语专业的一年级学生参加了台湾一所国立理工大学的这项研究。结果表明,CLIL学习者对高质量材料的期望相当高,我们的设计获得的一致性比标准低5%-25%。此外,学习者的性别、语言能力和以前的中学专业是影响他们如何看待质量标准和我们自己的CLIL材料的因素。这表明在理工大学设计基于cll的课程材料的复杂性,以解决学习者的个体差异(特别是在需求和期望方面),并具有教学意义。引用本文(APA) / Para citar este articulo (APA) / Para citar este artigo (APA) Yang, W.(2018)。评估情境化内容和语言综合学习材料在高等教育水平。中华医学杂志,11(2),236-274。收稿日期:11/09/2018获批日期:30/11/2018
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating Contextualized Content and Language Integrated Learning Materials at Tertiary Level
Evaluacion de materiales de aprendizaje integrado de contenidos y lenguas extranjeras contextualizados a nivel de educacion superior Avaliacao de materiais de aprendizagem integrada de conteudos e linguas estrangeiras contextualizados a nivel de ensino superior The Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approach has been broadly adopted and extensively researched at different educational levels across European contexts. It is also becoming popular in Asian settings due to its dual focus on developing both language skills and content knowledge. It aims to empower learners with high mobility and employability in the globalized job market. However, successful implementation of CLIL in these countries has been difficult for various reasons, including lack of suitable CLIL-based curricular materials. This study reports how an English for Specific Purposes (ESP) teacher, who is also a CLIL practitioner, worked collaboratively with an English learner who has professional, industrial internship experience, to produce contextualized CLIL learning materials for tertiary education. It also examines to what extent the self-designed CLIL materials satisfy standards of good quality. In total, 47 English-major first-year students joined the study in a national polytechnic university in Taiwan. The results reveal that CLIL learners have a fairly high expectation of quality materials, and our design received 5%–25% lower agreement than the criteria. Moreover, learners’ gender, language proficiency and previous secondary school major were factors that affected how they perceive the criteria of quality and our own CLIL materials. This demonstrates complexities of designing CLIL-based curricular materials addressing learners’ individual differences (especially in terms of needs and expectations) in a polytechnic university with pedagogic implications. To reference this article (APA) / Para citar este articulo (APA) / Para citar este artigo (APA) Yang, W. (2018). Evaluating Contextualized Content and Language Integrated Learning Materials at Tertiary Level. LACLIL, 11 (2), 236-274. DOI: 10.5294/laclil.2018.11.2.4 Received: 11/09/2018 Apporved: 30/11/2018
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Perceived Constraints of Contextual Factors on CLIL Teachers’ Effectiveness: Effect of a Training Course Can WhatsApp Enhance Students’ Learning in CLIL? Women’s Suffrage Through the CLIL Approach CLIL and Critical Thinking Through Literature: Activities on Poems about Argentina’s Military Dictatorship Making emotions count through CLIL
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1