苏门答腊北原大学口腔外科口腔外科0、12%二光酸氯己定和1%聚维酮碘作为无菌技术对细菌总数的影响

I. Isnandar, Hendry Rusdy, I. B. Siregar, Karisha HS. Ashari
{"title":"苏门答腊北原大学口腔外科口腔外科0、12%二光酸氯己定和1%聚维酮碘作为无菌技术对细菌总数的影响","authors":"I. Isnandar, Hendry Rusdy, I. B. Siregar, Karisha HS. Ashari","doi":"10.15562/jdmfs.v0i0.849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% and povidone iodine 1% on total bacterial count after mouth rinsing at the department of oral surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara Material and Methods: This was an experimental study with posttest only control group design approach. Purposive technique was applied to collect samples which are clinical students. In this study, sample were divided into 3 groups and each consisting of 12 people. Normal saline 0.9% was used as control group while chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% and povidone iodine 1% was used as the treatment group. Each member performed mouth rinsing for 30 seconds. Results: The results were statistically analyzed using Kruskal Wallis and MannWhitney test. The comparison between chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% and povidone iodine 1% showed a significant difference to the total bacteria count after mouth rinsing (p<0.05) and the chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% group showed a greater mean reduction. Conclusion: Chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% reduce more bacteria than povidone iodine 1%. However, both of the antiseptic agents can be a choice for mouth rinsing. Keyword: Bacteria colonization, Chlorhexidine digluconate, Mouth rinsing, Povidone iodine Cite this Article: Isnandar, Rusdy H, Siregar IB, Ashari KHS. 2021. Efficacy of Rinsing Chlorhexidine Digluconate 0,12% and Povidone Iodine 1% on Total Bacterial Count as Aseptic Technique at Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science 6(1): 42-44. DOI: 10.15562/jdmfs.v6i1.849 Efficacy of Rinsing Chlorhexidine Digluconate 0,12% and Povidone Iodine 1% on Total Bacterial Count as Aseptic Technique at Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara Isnandar,* Hendry Rusdy, Indra B. Siregar, Karisha Hanna Sulviati Ashari","PeriodicalId":31119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science","volume":"2013 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Rinsing Chlorhexidine Digluconate 0,12% and Povidone Iodine 1% on Total Bacterial Count as Aseptic Technique at Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara\",\"authors\":\"I. Isnandar, Hendry Rusdy, I. B. Siregar, Karisha HS. Ashari\",\"doi\":\"10.15562/jdmfs.v0i0.849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% and povidone iodine 1% on total bacterial count after mouth rinsing at the department of oral surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara Material and Methods: This was an experimental study with posttest only control group design approach. Purposive technique was applied to collect samples which are clinical students. In this study, sample were divided into 3 groups and each consisting of 12 people. Normal saline 0.9% was used as control group while chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% and povidone iodine 1% was used as the treatment group. Each member performed mouth rinsing for 30 seconds. Results: The results were statistically analyzed using Kruskal Wallis and MannWhitney test. The comparison between chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% and povidone iodine 1% showed a significant difference to the total bacteria count after mouth rinsing (p<0.05) and the chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% group showed a greater mean reduction. Conclusion: Chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% reduce more bacteria than povidone iodine 1%. However, both of the antiseptic agents can be a choice for mouth rinsing. Keyword: Bacteria colonization, Chlorhexidine digluconate, Mouth rinsing, Povidone iodine Cite this Article: Isnandar, Rusdy H, Siregar IB, Ashari KHS. 2021. Efficacy of Rinsing Chlorhexidine Digluconate 0,12% and Povidone Iodine 1% on Total Bacterial Count as Aseptic Technique at Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science 6(1): 42-44. DOI: 10.15562/jdmfs.v6i1.849 Efficacy of Rinsing Chlorhexidine Digluconate 0,12% and Povidone Iodine 1% on Total Bacterial Count as Aseptic Technique at Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara Isnandar,* Hendry Rusdy, Indra B. Siregar, Karisha Hanna Sulviati Ashari\",\"PeriodicalId\":31119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science\",\"volume\":\"2013 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15562/jdmfs.v0i0.849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15562/jdmfs.v0i0.849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较0.12%的二光酸氯己定与1%的聚维酮碘在苏门答腊岛北坂大学口腔外科口腔冲洗后细菌总数的差异。材料与方法:采用后验对照组设计方法。采用目的技术采集临床学生样本。在本研究中,样本被分为3组,每组12人。以0.9%生理盐水为对照组,0.12%二光酸氯己定和1%聚维酮碘为治疗组。每位成员漱口30秒。结果:采用Kruskal Wallis检验和MannWhitney检验对结果进行统计学分析。0.12%二光酸氯己定与1%聚维酮碘漱口后细菌总数差异有统计学意义(p<0.05), 0.12%二光酸氯己定漱口后细菌总数减少幅度更大。结论:二光酸氯己定0.12%比聚维酮碘1%的抑菌效果好。然而,这两种抗菌剂都可以作为漱口的选择。关键词:细菌定植,二光酸氯己定,漱口水,聚维酮碘2021. 苏门答腊北原大学口腔外科口腔外科0、12%二光酸氯己定和1%聚维酮碘作为无菌技术对细菌总数的影响牙颌面科学杂志,6(1):42-44。DOI: 10.15562/jdmf .v6i1.849在苏门答腊Utara Isnandar大学口腔外科,牙科学院,* Hendry Rusdy, Indra B. Siregar, Karisha Hanna Sulviati Ashari,用无菌技术冲洗二光酸氯己定0,12%和聚维酮碘1%对细菌总数的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Rinsing Chlorhexidine Digluconate 0,12% and Povidone Iodine 1% on Total Bacterial Count as Aseptic Technique at Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara
Objective: To compare chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% and povidone iodine 1% on total bacterial count after mouth rinsing at the department of oral surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara Material and Methods: This was an experimental study with posttest only control group design approach. Purposive technique was applied to collect samples which are clinical students. In this study, sample were divided into 3 groups and each consisting of 12 people. Normal saline 0.9% was used as control group while chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% and povidone iodine 1% was used as the treatment group. Each member performed mouth rinsing for 30 seconds. Results: The results were statistically analyzed using Kruskal Wallis and MannWhitney test. The comparison between chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% and povidone iodine 1% showed a significant difference to the total bacteria count after mouth rinsing (p<0.05) and the chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% group showed a greater mean reduction. Conclusion: Chlorhexidine digluconate 0.12% reduce more bacteria than povidone iodine 1%. However, both of the antiseptic agents can be a choice for mouth rinsing. Keyword: Bacteria colonization, Chlorhexidine digluconate, Mouth rinsing, Povidone iodine Cite this Article: Isnandar, Rusdy H, Siregar IB, Ashari KHS. 2021. Efficacy of Rinsing Chlorhexidine Digluconate 0,12% and Povidone Iodine 1% on Total Bacterial Count as Aseptic Technique at Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science 6(1): 42-44. DOI: 10.15562/jdmfs.v6i1.849 Efficacy of Rinsing Chlorhexidine Digluconate 0,12% and Povidone Iodine 1% on Total Bacterial Count as Aseptic Technique at Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sumatera Utara Isnandar,* Hendry Rusdy, Indra B. Siregar, Karisha Hanna Sulviati Ashari
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association between eating pattern and food neophobia in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): Parents' perceptions Combination of surgical exposure and fixed orthodontic appliance in bilateral impacted canine Oral potentially malignant disorder awareness level among elder community in the Belawa Distric, Wajo, South Sulawesi, Indonesia Management of central diastema with high-frenulum labialis Immunohistochemistry assay of osteocalcin on bone healing with CHA-10% propolis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1