用乙醇或蔗糖对厌氧土壤进行消毒,会降低爪哇甜根菌和头沟菌的生存能力

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2023-07-26 DOI:10.4025/actascibiolsci.v45i1.64832
Augusto Nicomedes Andrade Quintino, E. Cañedo, E. A. Lopes, B. S. Vieira, Valdir Lourenço Junior, D. F. Parreira, Wania Santos Neves
{"title":"用乙醇或蔗糖对厌氧土壤进行消毒,会降低爪哇甜根菌和头沟菌的生存能力","authors":"Augusto Nicomedes Andrade Quintino, E. Cañedo, E. A. Lopes, B. S. Vieira, Valdir Lourenço Junior, D. F. Parreira, Wania Santos Neves","doi":"10.4025/actascibiolsci.v45i1.64832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) is an ecological alternative to chemical soil fumigation. However, little is known about the potential of this technique for the management of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora. To test the hypothesis that ASD reduces the viability of these two pathogens, we assessed ethanol (5%, v:v) and sucrose (5%, m:v) as carbon sources for ASD, for an incubation period of three weeks. Twenty kilograms of soil naturally infested with M. javanica (82 ± 43 J2 100 cm-3 soil) were placed into a plastic container. Polyester traps, each with 15 S. cepivora sclerotia, were buried at 10 and 20 cm depth per container. ASD with diluted ethanol or sucrose (5% v:v or m:v) was compared to the untreated control (UTC), chemical fumigant metam sodium (MS), and soil saturation with water. In comparison to the UTC, ASD using ethanol reduced the numbers of J2 in soil and the galls in tomato roots by more than 93%, a degree of suppression similar to that achieved when using MS. The viability of sclerotia of S. cepivora was reduced by ASD using ethanol or sucrose from 38.12 to 58.1% compared to the UTC. ASD for three weeks using ethanol or sucrose (5%) reduces the viability of M. javanica and S. cepivora in the microcosm.","PeriodicalId":7166,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences","volume":"23 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anaerobic soil disinfestation with ethanol or sucrose reduces the viability of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora\",\"authors\":\"Augusto Nicomedes Andrade Quintino, E. Cañedo, E. A. Lopes, B. S. Vieira, Valdir Lourenço Junior, D. F. Parreira, Wania Santos Neves\",\"doi\":\"10.4025/actascibiolsci.v45i1.64832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) is an ecological alternative to chemical soil fumigation. However, little is known about the potential of this technique for the management of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora. To test the hypothesis that ASD reduces the viability of these two pathogens, we assessed ethanol (5%, v:v) and sucrose (5%, m:v) as carbon sources for ASD, for an incubation period of three weeks. Twenty kilograms of soil naturally infested with M. javanica (82 ± 43 J2 100 cm-3 soil) were placed into a plastic container. Polyester traps, each with 15 S. cepivora sclerotia, were buried at 10 and 20 cm depth per container. ASD with diluted ethanol or sucrose (5% v:v or m:v) was compared to the untreated control (UTC), chemical fumigant metam sodium (MS), and soil saturation with water. In comparison to the UTC, ASD using ethanol reduced the numbers of J2 in soil and the galls in tomato roots by more than 93%, a degree of suppression similar to that achieved when using MS. The viability of sclerotia of S. cepivora was reduced by ASD using ethanol or sucrose from 38.12 to 58.1% compared to the UTC. ASD for three weeks using ethanol or sucrose (5%) reduces the viability of M. javanica and S. cepivora in the microcosm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"23 4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v45i1.64832\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v45i1.64832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

厌氧土壤消毒(ASD)是化学土壤熏蒸的生态替代品。然而,人们对这种技术在爪哇花栗蛾和头斑蛾管理方面的潜力知之甚少。为了验证ASD降低这两种病原体活力的假设,我们评估了乙醇(5%,v:v)和蔗糖(5%,m:v)作为ASD的碳源,潜伏期为三周。将土壤(82±43 J2 100 cm-3) 20 kg置于塑料容器中。聚酯诱捕器每箱埋深10 cm和20 cm,每个诱捕器装有15个子囊。将稀释乙醇或蔗糖(5% v:v或m:v)的ASD与未处理的对照(UTC)、化学熏蒸剂metam sodium (MS)和土壤含水量进行比较。与对照相比,使用乙醇的ASD使土壤中J2的数量和番茄根瘿的数量减少了93%以上,与使用ms的抑制程度相似。与对照相比,使用乙醇或蔗糖的ASD使S. cepivora菌核活力从38.12%降低到58.1%。使用乙醇或蔗糖(5%)进行为期三周的ASD降低了微观世界中javanica和S. cepivora的生存能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anaerobic soil disinfestation with ethanol or sucrose reduces the viability of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora
Anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) is an ecological alternative to chemical soil fumigation. However, little is known about the potential of this technique for the management of Meloidogyne javanica and Stromatinia cepivora. To test the hypothesis that ASD reduces the viability of these two pathogens, we assessed ethanol (5%, v:v) and sucrose (5%, m:v) as carbon sources for ASD, for an incubation period of three weeks. Twenty kilograms of soil naturally infested with M. javanica (82 ± 43 J2 100 cm-3 soil) were placed into a plastic container. Polyester traps, each with 15 S. cepivora sclerotia, were buried at 10 and 20 cm depth per container. ASD with diluted ethanol or sucrose (5% v:v or m:v) was compared to the untreated control (UTC), chemical fumigant metam sodium (MS), and soil saturation with water. In comparison to the UTC, ASD using ethanol reduced the numbers of J2 in soil and the galls in tomato roots by more than 93%, a degree of suppression similar to that achieved when using MS. The viability of sclerotia of S. cepivora was reduced by ASD using ethanol or sucrose from 38.12 to 58.1% compared to the UTC. ASD for three weeks using ethanol or sucrose (5%) reduces the viability of M. javanica and S. cepivora in the microcosm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences
Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original articles in all areas of Biological Sciences, including anatomy, bacteriology, molecular biology, biochemistry, botany, cytology and cell biology, animal behavior, ecology, limnology, embryology, and histology, morpho-physiology, genetics, microbiology, parasitology and zoology.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of the digestive microbiome of invasive Limnoperna fortunei (Dunker, 1857) collected in different seasons in the upper Uruguay River, Santa Catarina, Brazil Genetic diversity among genotypes of Parkia platycephala (Benth.), a typical tree of northeastern Brazil Bat fauna from the Sooretama Biological Reserve, southeastern Brazil A comparative investigation of bioactive compounds present in Datura stramonium L. leaves extract in various solvents (ethanol, aqua, and ether) using TLC, IR, and GC-MS analytical techniques Parasites of juvenile Salminus brasiliensis and Brycon orbignyanus (Characiformes, Bryconidae) in the middle Paraná River, Argentina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1