社论:关于大数据共享价值的观点

Christopher L. Tucci, G. Viscusi
{"title":"社论:关于大数据共享价值的观点","authors":"Christopher L. Tucci, G. Viscusi","doi":"10.1108/itp-04-2022-872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The concept of Big Data has gone through several cycles of awareness, with no small amount of industry hype (Davenport et al., 2012) followed by a growing interest in academia (Abbasi et al., 2016; Batini et al., 2015; Buhl et al., 2013; Goes, 2014; G€ unther et al., 2017; Rai, 2016). The current common understanding of Big Data can be summarized by the following definition that appeared in 2013 in the first issue of Big Data, one of the first journals on the topic: Big Data is data that exceeds the processing capacity of conventional database systems. The data is too big, moves too fast or does not fit the structures of your database architectures. To gain value from this data, youmust choose an alternative way to process it (Dumbill, 2013). The hype (and phenomenon) followed and overlapped with public sector interest in open government data (OGD) (Bertot et al., 2014), symbolically reinforced at a global level by the memoranda and directives signed by Barack Obama in the early years of his first mandate (Chignard, 2013; Obama, 2009). The overlap of interests between the private and public sectors raises the question of the different types of value (economic, public and social value) that Big Data may have and the challenges related to having access to and sharing them, such as data quality and privacy (Batini et al., 2015; Jain et al., 2016; Menon and Sarkar, 2016). This special section aims to provide an outlook on research on these issues, considering specifically the connection, on the one hand, between Big Data, public safety, security and quality of life and, on the other hand, the different paths of business model innovation (cf. Massa and Tucci, 2021) enabled by Big Data, such as social innovation (Misuraca et al., 2018) and crowd-driven innovation (Afuah and Tucci, 2012; Tucci et al., 2018). Inspired by the rise of Big Data platforms and infrastructure that handle both structured and unstructured data from a multitude of domains and data sources (ranging from environmental and weather data to wearables, passenger vehicle sensors, financial and insurance institutions’ data streams and social web data), this special section explores the benefits and advantages—as well as the challenges, limitations and threats (at the data security and privacy level)—that emerge from the Big Data value chain (Curry, 2016; Miller and Mork, 2013), delivering “intelligence” to support operations that surround various aspects of human living. It is worth noting that the special section also considers the social value impact of Big Data-driven innovation in terms of capabilities and functionings enabled by emerging Big Data ecosystems. In particular, we refer to the construct of the “capability approach” (Nussbaum, 2011; Sen, 1992) where the focus is on “human functionings,” which are the various states of human beings and the doings or activities that a person can undertake, and capabilities, i.e. the opportunities to achieve functionings as outcomes. For example, traveling is a functioning, and the real opportunity to have a safe and secure trip is the corresponding capability. Taking these issues into account, Big Data and open linked data are a key resource for enabling capabilities, support decision-making on these issues and Editorial","PeriodicalId":13533,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Technol. People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial: Perspectives on the value of Big Data sharing\",\"authors\":\"Christopher L. Tucci, G. Viscusi\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/itp-04-2022-872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction The concept of Big Data has gone through several cycles of awareness, with no small amount of industry hype (Davenport et al., 2012) followed by a growing interest in academia (Abbasi et al., 2016; Batini et al., 2015; Buhl et al., 2013; Goes, 2014; G€ unther et al., 2017; Rai, 2016). The current common understanding of Big Data can be summarized by the following definition that appeared in 2013 in the first issue of Big Data, one of the first journals on the topic: Big Data is data that exceeds the processing capacity of conventional database systems. The data is too big, moves too fast or does not fit the structures of your database architectures. To gain value from this data, youmust choose an alternative way to process it (Dumbill, 2013). The hype (and phenomenon) followed and overlapped with public sector interest in open government data (OGD) (Bertot et al., 2014), symbolically reinforced at a global level by the memoranda and directives signed by Barack Obama in the early years of his first mandate (Chignard, 2013; Obama, 2009). The overlap of interests between the private and public sectors raises the question of the different types of value (economic, public and social value) that Big Data may have and the challenges related to having access to and sharing them, such as data quality and privacy (Batini et al., 2015; Jain et al., 2016; Menon and Sarkar, 2016). This special section aims to provide an outlook on research on these issues, considering specifically the connection, on the one hand, between Big Data, public safety, security and quality of life and, on the other hand, the different paths of business model innovation (cf. Massa and Tucci, 2021) enabled by Big Data, such as social innovation (Misuraca et al., 2018) and crowd-driven innovation (Afuah and Tucci, 2012; Tucci et al., 2018). Inspired by the rise of Big Data platforms and infrastructure that handle both structured and unstructured data from a multitude of domains and data sources (ranging from environmental and weather data to wearables, passenger vehicle sensors, financial and insurance institutions’ data streams and social web data), this special section explores the benefits and advantages—as well as the challenges, limitations and threats (at the data security and privacy level)—that emerge from the Big Data value chain (Curry, 2016; Miller and Mork, 2013), delivering “intelligence” to support operations that surround various aspects of human living. It is worth noting that the special section also considers the social value impact of Big Data-driven innovation in terms of capabilities and functionings enabled by emerging Big Data ecosystems. In particular, we refer to the construct of the “capability approach” (Nussbaum, 2011; Sen, 1992) where the focus is on “human functionings,” which are the various states of human beings and the doings or activities that a person can undertake, and capabilities, i.e. the opportunities to achieve functionings as outcomes. For example, traveling is a functioning, and the real opportunity to have a safe and secure trip is the corresponding capability. Taking these issues into account, Big Data and open linked data are a key resource for enabling capabilities, support decision-making on these issues and Editorial\",\"PeriodicalId\":13533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inf. Technol. People\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inf. Technol. People\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-04-2022-872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Technol. People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/itp-04-2022-872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大数据的概念经历了几个认识周期,伴随着大量的行业炒作(Davenport et al., 2012),学术界对大数据的兴趣也越来越大(Abbasi et al., 2016;Batini et al., 2015;Buhl et al., 2013;, 2014;G€unther等人,2017;意大利广播电视公司,2016)。目前对大数据的普遍理解可以用2013年第一期《大数据》(Big Data)杂志对大数据的定义来概括:大数据是超出传统数据库系统处理能力的数据。数据太大,移动太快,或者不适合数据库架构的结构。为了从这些数据中获得价值,你必须选择一种替代方法来处理它(Dumbill, 2013)。这种炒作(和现象)紧随公共部门对开放政府数据(OGD)的兴趣之后并与之重叠(Bertot等人,2014年),巴拉克•奥巴马(Barack Obama)在其第一个任期的早期签署的备忘录和指令在全球范围内象征性地加强了这一点(Chignard, 2013;奥巴马,2009)。私营和公共部门之间的利益重叠提出了大数据可能具有的不同类型价值(经济,公共和社会价值)的问题,以及与访问和共享它们相关的挑战,例如数据质量和隐私(巴蒂尼等人,2015;Jain et al., 2016;Menon and Sarkar, 2016)。本专题旨在对这些问题的研究进行展望,具体考虑大数据与公共安全、保障和生活质量之间的联系,以及大数据带来的不同商业模式创新路径(cf. Massa and Tucci, 2021),如社会创新(Misuraca et al., 2018)和群体驱动创新(Afuah and Tucci, 2012;Tucci et al., 2018)。受大数据平台和基础设施兴起的启发,这些平台和基础设施可以处理来自众多领域和数据源的结构化和非结构化数据(从环境和天气数据到可穿戴设备、乘用车传感器、金融和保险机构的数据流和社交网络数据),本专题探讨了大数据的好处和优势,以及面临的挑战。大数据价值链中出现的限制和威胁(在数据安全和隐私层面)(Curry, 2016;Miller和Mork, 2013),提供“智能”来支持围绕人类生活的各个方面的操作。值得注意的是,特别部分还考虑了新兴大数据生态系统所带来的能力和功能方面的大数据驱动创新的社会价值影响。我们特别提到了“能力方法”的构建(Nussbaum, 2011;Sen, 1992),其中重点是“人类功能”,这是人类的各种状态,一个人可以从事的行为或活动,以及能力,即实现功能作为结果的机会。例如,旅行是一种功能,真正有机会有一个安全可靠的旅行是相应的能力。考虑到这些问题,大数据和开放关联数据是实现能力的关键资源,支持这些问题和编辑的决策
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editorial: Perspectives on the value of Big Data sharing
Introduction The concept of Big Data has gone through several cycles of awareness, with no small amount of industry hype (Davenport et al., 2012) followed by a growing interest in academia (Abbasi et al., 2016; Batini et al., 2015; Buhl et al., 2013; Goes, 2014; G€ unther et al., 2017; Rai, 2016). The current common understanding of Big Data can be summarized by the following definition that appeared in 2013 in the first issue of Big Data, one of the first journals on the topic: Big Data is data that exceeds the processing capacity of conventional database systems. The data is too big, moves too fast or does not fit the structures of your database architectures. To gain value from this data, youmust choose an alternative way to process it (Dumbill, 2013). The hype (and phenomenon) followed and overlapped with public sector interest in open government data (OGD) (Bertot et al., 2014), symbolically reinforced at a global level by the memoranda and directives signed by Barack Obama in the early years of his first mandate (Chignard, 2013; Obama, 2009). The overlap of interests between the private and public sectors raises the question of the different types of value (economic, public and social value) that Big Data may have and the challenges related to having access to and sharing them, such as data quality and privacy (Batini et al., 2015; Jain et al., 2016; Menon and Sarkar, 2016). This special section aims to provide an outlook on research on these issues, considering specifically the connection, on the one hand, between Big Data, public safety, security and quality of life and, on the other hand, the different paths of business model innovation (cf. Massa and Tucci, 2021) enabled by Big Data, such as social innovation (Misuraca et al., 2018) and crowd-driven innovation (Afuah and Tucci, 2012; Tucci et al., 2018). Inspired by the rise of Big Data platforms and infrastructure that handle both structured and unstructured data from a multitude of domains and data sources (ranging from environmental and weather data to wearables, passenger vehicle sensors, financial and insurance institutions’ data streams and social web data), this special section explores the benefits and advantages—as well as the challenges, limitations and threats (at the data security and privacy level)—that emerge from the Big Data value chain (Curry, 2016; Miller and Mork, 2013), delivering “intelligence” to support operations that surround various aspects of human living. It is worth noting that the special section also considers the social value impact of Big Data-driven innovation in terms of capabilities and functionings enabled by emerging Big Data ecosystems. In particular, we refer to the construct of the “capability approach” (Nussbaum, 2011; Sen, 1992) where the focus is on “human functionings,” which are the various states of human beings and the doings or activities that a person can undertake, and capabilities, i.e. the opportunities to achieve functionings as outcomes. For example, traveling is a functioning, and the real opportunity to have a safe and secure trip is the corresponding capability. Taking these issues into account, Big Data and open linked data are a key resource for enabling capabilities, support decision-making on these issues and Editorial
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Guest editorial: Work from home (WFH), employee productivity and wellbeing: lessons from COVID-19 and future implications Exploring the impact of digital work on work-life balance and job performance: a technology affordance perspective Exploring the effects of different achievement goals on contributor participation in crowdsourcing Supporting participatory innovation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative study of enterprise social media use Understanding customer's meaningful engagement with AI-powered service robots
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1