战略人才管理:硬技能与软技能的比较分析

{"title":"战略人才管理:硬技能与软技能的比较分析","authors":"","doi":"10.34104/ijma.023.033040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The war for talent is an ongoing problem for organizations. This study examined strategic talent management in the workplace. It compared three talent management dimensions including: a) attraction b) selection and c) retention in hard skills and soft skills. The research reviewed the barriers to effective talent management and successful policies. The author conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 human resources (HR) professionals, focusing on strategic talent management dimensions in hard skills and soft skills. Responses from the interviews were coded and details about the differences were summarized. The data from the interviews were evaluated using chi-square analyses to identify statistically significant differences in HR professionals’ perceptions of strategic talent management in hard skills versus soft skills. The research suggested plausible reasons for the significant differences in managers’ perceptions of talent management effectiveness in hard skills and soft skills. These results create a comprehensive framework for organizations to develop strategic talent management guidelines.","PeriodicalId":42721,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Economics Management and Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic Talent Management: A Comparative Analysis of Hard Vs. Soft Skills\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.34104/ijma.023.033040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The war for talent is an ongoing problem for organizations. This study examined strategic talent management in the workplace. It compared three talent management dimensions including: a) attraction b) selection and c) retention in hard skills and soft skills. The research reviewed the barriers to effective talent management and successful policies. The author conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 human resources (HR) professionals, focusing on strategic talent management dimensions in hard skills and soft skills. Responses from the interviews were coded and details about the differences were summarized. The data from the interviews were evaluated using chi-square analyses to identify statistically significant differences in HR professionals’ perceptions of strategic talent management in hard skills versus soft skills. The research suggested plausible reasons for the significant differences in managers’ perceptions of talent management effectiveness in hard skills and soft skills. These results create a comprehensive framework for organizations to develop strategic talent management guidelines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Economics Management and Accounting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Economics Management and Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34104/ijma.023.033040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Economics Management and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34104/ijma.023.033040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人才争夺战一直是企业面临的问题。本研究考察了工作场所的战略人才管理。它比较了三个人才管理维度,包括:a)吸引力;b)选择;c)硬技能和软技能的保留。该研究回顾了有效人才管理和成功政策的障碍。笔者对24位人力资源专业人士进行了半结构化访谈,重点研究了战略人才管理的硬技能和软技能维度。对访谈的回答进行编码,并对差异的细节进行总结。访谈数据使用卡方分析进行评估,以确定人力资源专业人员对战略人才管理在硬技能和软技能方面的看法在统计上的显著差异。研究为管理者对人才管理有效性的认知在硬技能和软技能方面存在显著差异提供了合理的解释。这些结果为组织制定战略性人才管理指导方针创建了一个全面的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strategic Talent Management: A Comparative Analysis of Hard Vs. Soft Skills
The war for talent is an ongoing problem for organizations. This study examined strategic talent management in the workplace. It compared three talent management dimensions including: a) attraction b) selection and c) retention in hard skills and soft skills. The research reviewed the barriers to effective talent management and successful policies. The author conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 human resources (HR) professionals, focusing on strategic talent management dimensions in hard skills and soft skills. Responses from the interviews were coded and details about the differences were summarized. The data from the interviews were evaluated using chi-square analyses to identify statistically significant differences in HR professionals’ perceptions of strategic talent management in hard skills versus soft skills. The research suggested plausible reasons for the significant differences in managers’ perceptions of talent management effectiveness in hard skills and soft skills. These results create a comprehensive framework for organizations to develop strategic talent management guidelines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
New accounting standards and the performance of quantitative investors Does transparency about banks’ lending costs lower firms’ borrowing costs? Evidence from India In search of a unicorn: Dynamic agency with endogenous investment opportunities The unicorn quest: Deriving empirical predictions from theory Financial statements not required
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1