东开普省私营重症监护病房实施循证实践的障碍

P. Jordan, C. Bowers, D. Morton
{"title":"东开普省私营重症监护病房实施循证实践的障碍","authors":"P. Jordan, C. Bowers, D. Morton","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2016.V32I2.253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background . Evidence-based practices (EBPs) have been promoted to enhance the delivery of patient care, reduce cost, increase patient and family satisfaction and contribute to professional development. Individual and organisational barriers can hamper the implementation of EBP, which can be detrimental to healthcare delivery. Objective . To determine the individual and organisational implementation barriers of EBP among nurses in a private intensive care unit (ICU). Methods . A quantitative research design was used to collect data from nurses in a private ICU in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. The structured questionnaire (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.72) was administered to 70 respondents, with a response rate of 93%. Results . Barriers at individual level were identified, and include lack of familiarity with EBP, individual perceptions that underpin clinical decision-making, lack of access to information required for EBP, inadequate sources to access evidence, inability to synthesise the literature available, and resistance to change. Barriers related to organisational support, change and operations were identified. Conclusion . Although the findings were similar to other studies, this study showed that nurses younger than 40 years of age were more familiar with the concepts of EBP. Physicians were perceived as not being very supportive of EBP implementation. In order to enhance healthcare delivery in the ICUs, nurse managers need to take cognisance of the individual and organisational barriers that might hamper the implementation of EBP.","PeriodicalId":75194,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","volume":"27 1","pages":"50-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to implementing evidence-based practice in a private intensive care unit in the Eastern Cape\",\"authors\":\"P. Jordan, C. Bowers, D. Morton\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/SAJCC.2016.V32I2.253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background . Evidence-based practices (EBPs) have been promoted to enhance the delivery of patient care, reduce cost, increase patient and family satisfaction and contribute to professional development. Individual and organisational barriers can hamper the implementation of EBP, which can be detrimental to healthcare delivery. Objective . To determine the individual and organisational implementation barriers of EBP among nurses in a private intensive care unit (ICU). Methods . A quantitative research design was used to collect data from nurses in a private ICU in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. The structured questionnaire (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.72) was administered to 70 respondents, with a response rate of 93%. Results . Barriers at individual level were identified, and include lack of familiarity with EBP, individual perceptions that underpin clinical decision-making, lack of access to information required for EBP, inadequate sources to access evidence, inability to synthesise the literature available, and resistance to change. Barriers related to organisational support, change and operations were identified. Conclusion . Although the findings were similar to other studies, this study showed that nurses younger than 40 years of age were more familiar with the concepts of EBP. Physicians were perceived as not being very supportive of EBP implementation. In order to enhance healthcare delivery in the ICUs, nurse managers need to take cognisance of the individual and organisational barriers that might hamper the implementation of EBP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"50-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2016.V32I2.253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2016.V32I2.253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

背景。循证实践(ebp)已被推广,以加强提供病人护理,降低成本,提高病人和家属的满意度,并有助于专业发展。个人和组织的障碍可能阻碍EBP的实施,这可能不利于医疗保健服务的提供。目标。目的:确定私立重症监护病房(ICU)护士个人和组织实施EBP的障碍。方法。定量研究设计用于收集来自南非东开普省一家私立ICU护士的数据。采用结构化问卷(Cronbach’s alpha: 0.72)对70名被调查者进行问卷调查,回复率为93%。结果。确定了个体层面的障碍,包括对EBP缺乏熟悉,支持临床决策的个人认知,缺乏获取EBP所需信息的途径,获取证据的来源不足,无法综合现有文献,以及对变革的抵制。确定了与组织支持、变革和运营相关的障碍。结论。虽然研究结果与其他研究相似,但本研究显示年龄小于40岁的护士对EBP的概念更为熟悉。医生被认为不太支持EBP的实施。为了加强icu的医疗服务,护士管理者需要认识到可能阻碍EBP实施的个人和组织障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers to implementing evidence-based practice in a private intensive care unit in the Eastern Cape
Background . Evidence-based practices (EBPs) have been promoted to enhance the delivery of patient care, reduce cost, increase patient and family satisfaction and contribute to professional development. Individual and organisational barriers can hamper the implementation of EBP, which can be detrimental to healthcare delivery. Objective . To determine the individual and organisational implementation barriers of EBP among nurses in a private intensive care unit (ICU). Methods . A quantitative research design was used to collect data from nurses in a private ICU in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. The structured questionnaire (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.72) was administered to 70 respondents, with a response rate of 93%. Results . Barriers at individual level were identified, and include lack of familiarity with EBP, individual perceptions that underpin clinical decision-making, lack of access to information required for EBP, inadequate sources to access evidence, inability to synthesise the literature available, and resistance to change. Barriers related to organisational support, change and operations were identified. Conclusion . Although the findings were similar to other studies, this study showed that nurses younger than 40 years of age were more familiar with the concepts of EBP. Physicians were perceived as not being very supportive of EBP implementation. In order to enhance healthcare delivery in the ICUs, nurse managers need to take cognisance of the individual and organisational barriers that might hamper the implementation of EBP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relevance and application of clinical practice guidelines in different settings. Deep medicine … Navigating the intersection of technology, cognition and ethics in the digital age of medicine. The missed art of care? Prevalence and independent predictors of in-hospital stroke among patients who developed acute alteration of consciousness in the medical intensive care unit: A retrospective case-control study. Carbon dioxide levels of ventilated adult critically ill post-operative patients on arrival at the intensive care unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1