二进制提升器的可扩展验证

Sandeep Dasgupta, S. Dinesh, Deepan Venkatesh, Vikram S. Adve, Christopher W. Fletcher
{"title":"二进制提升器的可扩展验证","authors":"Sandeep Dasgupta, S. Dinesh, Deepan Venkatesh, Vikram S. Adve, Christopher W. Fletcher","doi":"10.1145/3385412.3385964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Validating the correctness of binary lifters is pivotal to gain trust in binary analysis, especially when used in scenarios where correctness is important. Existing approaches focus on validating the correctness of lifting instructions or basic blocks in isolation and do not scale to full programs. In this work, we show that formal translation validation of single instructions for a complex ISA like x86-64 is not only practical, but can be used as a building block for scalable full-program validation. Our work is the first to do translation validation of single instructions on an architecture as extensive as x86-64, uses the most precise formal semantics available, and has the widest coverage in terms of the number of instructions tested for correctness. Next, we develop a novel technique that uses validated instructions to enable program-level validation, without resorting to performance-heavy semantic equivalence checking. Specifically, we compose the validated IR sequences using a tool we develop called Compositional Lifter to create a reference standard. The semantic equivalence check between the reference and the lifter output is then reduced to a graph-isomorphism check through the use of semantic preserving transformations. The translation validation of instructions in isolation revealed 29 new bugs in McSema – a mature open-source lifter from x86-64 to LLVM IR. Towards the validation of full programs, our approach was able to prove the translational correctness of 2254/2348 functions taken from LLVM’s single-source benchmark test-suite.","PeriodicalId":20580,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scalable validation of binary lifters\",\"authors\":\"Sandeep Dasgupta, S. Dinesh, Deepan Venkatesh, Vikram S. Adve, Christopher W. Fletcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3385412.3385964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Validating the correctness of binary lifters is pivotal to gain trust in binary analysis, especially when used in scenarios where correctness is important. Existing approaches focus on validating the correctness of lifting instructions or basic blocks in isolation and do not scale to full programs. In this work, we show that formal translation validation of single instructions for a complex ISA like x86-64 is not only practical, but can be used as a building block for scalable full-program validation. Our work is the first to do translation validation of single instructions on an architecture as extensive as x86-64, uses the most precise formal semantics available, and has the widest coverage in terms of the number of instructions tested for correctness. Next, we develop a novel technique that uses validated instructions to enable program-level validation, without resorting to performance-heavy semantic equivalence checking. Specifically, we compose the validated IR sequences using a tool we develop called Compositional Lifter to create a reference standard. The semantic equivalence check between the reference and the lifter output is then reduced to a graph-isomorphism check through the use of semantic preserving transformations. The translation validation of instructions in isolation revealed 29 new bugs in McSema – a mature open-source lifter from x86-64 to LLVM IR. Towards the validation of full programs, our approach was able to prove the translational correctness of 2254/2348 functions taken from LLVM’s single-source benchmark test-suite.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3385412.3385964\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3385412.3385964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

验证二进制提升器的正确性对于获得对二进制分析的信任至关重要,特别是在正确性很重要的场景中使用时。现有的方法侧重于单独验证提升指令或基本块的正确性,而不能扩展到整个程序。在这项工作中,我们证明了对像x86-64这样的复杂ISA的单个指令的正式转换验证不仅是实用的,而且可以用作可扩展的完整程序验证的构建块。我们的工作是第一个在像x86-64这样广泛的体系结构上对单个指令进行翻译验证,使用最精确的形式语义,并且在测试正确性的指令数量方面具有最广泛的覆盖范围。接下来,我们开发了一种新技术,该技术使用经过验证的指令来启用程序级验证,而无需诉诸于性能繁重的语义等价检查。具体来说,我们使用我们开发的称为composition Lifter的工具来组合经过验证的IR序列,以创建参考标准。然后,通过使用语义保持转换,将引用和升降机输出之间的语义等价性检查简化为图同构检查。单独的指令翻译验证揭示了McSema中的29个新错误——McSema是一个成熟的开源程序,从x86-64升级到LLVM IR。为了验证完整的程序,我们的方法能够证明从LLVM的单源基准测试套件中获取的2254/2348函数的翻译正确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scalable validation of binary lifters
Validating the correctness of binary lifters is pivotal to gain trust in binary analysis, especially when used in scenarios where correctness is important. Existing approaches focus on validating the correctness of lifting instructions or basic blocks in isolation and do not scale to full programs. In this work, we show that formal translation validation of single instructions for a complex ISA like x86-64 is not only practical, but can be used as a building block for scalable full-program validation. Our work is the first to do translation validation of single instructions on an architecture as extensive as x86-64, uses the most precise formal semantics available, and has the widest coverage in terms of the number of instructions tested for correctness. Next, we develop a novel technique that uses validated instructions to enable program-level validation, without resorting to performance-heavy semantic equivalence checking. Specifically, we compose the validated IR sequences using a tool we develop called Compositional Lifter to create a reference standard. The semantic equivalence check between the reference and the lifter output is then reduced to a graph-isomorphism check through the use of semantic preserving transformations. The translation validation of instructions in isolation revealed 29 new bugs in McSema – a mature open-source lifter from x86-64 to LLVM IR. Towards the validation of full programs, our approach was able to prove the translational correctness of 2254/2348 functions taken from LLVM’s single-source benchmark test-suite.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Type error feedback via analytic program repair Inductive sequentialization of asynchronous programs Decidable verification under a causally consistent shared memory SympleGraph: distributed graph processing with precise loop-carried dependency guarantee Debug information validation for optimized code
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1