gf原子吸收光谱法直接固体进样测定含硫活性药物成分中砷的可行性

E. Flores, F. Duarte, Gabriel T. Druzian, Mariele S. Nascimento, J. Barin, R. Bolzan
{"title":"gf原子吸收光谱法直接固体进样测定含硫活性药物成分中砷的可行性","authors":"E. Flores, F. Duarte, Gabriel T. Druzian, Mariele S. Nascimento, J. Barin, R. Bolzan","doi":"10.22456/2527-2616.89766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A method for As determination in sulfur-containing active pharmaceutical ingredients (SC-APIs) by direct solid sampling graphite furnace atomic absorption (DSS-GF AAS) was developed. The proposed method was successfully applied to three SC-APIs (hydrochlorothiazide, furosemide and sulfadiazine). Palladium was used as chemical modifier as well as hydrogen during the pyrolysis allowing the direct determination of As in the SC-APIs without interferences caused by gaseous sulfur species. Sample masses (hydrochlorothiazide) from 0.4 to 3 mg were used and calibration with aqueous standard solutions was feasible. The limit of quantification was 0.033 mg g-1 and the calibration ranged from 0.1 to 1.6 ng As. Recoveries for As solutions added directly to the solid samples were between 95 and 103%, showing a good accuracy. The method validation highlighted its robustness, since variation in pyrolysis and atomization temperatures, as well as in Pd and sample masses, did not change significantly the results. Additional experiments showed that this method can be applied to other SC-APIs (as e.g., furosemide and sulfadiazine). Arsenic concentration in hydrochlorothiazide samples ranged from 0.13 to 0.48 mg g-1, while in furosemide and sulfadiazine samples it was from 0.49 and 0.54 mg g-1, respectively. The use of DSS-GF AAS does not require previous sample digestion and As could be directly determined in the solid samples providing some advantages, as lower risks of contamination and analyte losses, good accuracy and limits of quantification.","PeriodicalId":11314,"journal":{"name":"Drug Analytical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FEASIBILITY OF DIRECT SOLID SAMPLING FOR ARSENIC DETERMINATION IN SULFUR-CONTAINING ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENTS BY GF AAS\",\"authors\":\"E. Flores, F. Duarte, Gabriel T. Druzian, Mariele S. Nascimento, J. Barin, R. Bolzan\",\"doi\":\"10.22456/2527-2616.89766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A method for As determination in sulfur-containing active pharmaceutical ingredients (SC-APIs) by direct solid sampling graphite furnace atomic absorption (DSS-GF AAS) was developed. The proposed method was successfully applied to three SC-APIs (hydrochlorothiazide, furosemide and sulfadiazine). Palladium was used as chemical modifier as well as hydrogen during the pyrolysis allowing the direct determination of As in the SC-APIs without interferences caused by gaseous sulfur species. Sample masses (hydrochlorothiazide) from 0.4 to 3 mg were used and calibration with aqueous standard solutions was feasible. The limit of quantification was 0.033 mg g-1 and the calibration ranged from 0.1 to 1.6 ng As. Recoveries for As solutions added directly to the solid samples were between 95 and 103%, showing a good accuracy. The method validation highlighted its robustness, since variation in pyrolysis and atomization temperatures, as well as in Pd and sample masses, did not change significantly the results. Additional experiments showed that this method can be applied to other SC-APIs (as e.g., furosemide and sulfadiazine). Arsenic concentration in hydrochlorothiazide samples ranged from 0.13 to 0.48 mg g-1, while in furosemide and sulfadiazine samples it was from 0.49 and 0.54 mg g-1, respectively. The use of DSS-GF AAS does not require previous sample digestion and As could be directly determined in the solid samples providing some advantages, as lower risks of contamination and analyte losses, good accuracy and limits of quantification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Analytical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Analytical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22456/2527-2616.89766\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Analytical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22456/2527-2616.89766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建立了直接固体进样石墨炉原子吸收法(DSS-GF原子吸收法)测定含硫原料药中砷的方法。该方法成功地应用于三种sc - api(氢氯噻嗪、呋塞米和磺胺嘧啶)。在热解过程中使用钯和氢作为化学改性剂,可以直接测定sc - api中的as,而不受气态硫的干扰。样品质量(氢氯噻嗪)为0.4 ~ 3mg,用标准水溶液标定是可行的。定量限为0.033 mg g-1,校准范围为0.1 ~ 1.6 ng As。固相样品中直接添加砷的回收率在95 ~ 103%之间,具有良好的准确度。该方法的验证突出了其鲁棒性,因为热解和雾化温度以及Pd和样品质量的变化没有显著改变结果。进一步的实验表明,该方法可应用于其他sc - api(如速尿和磺胺嘧啶)。氢氯噻嗪样品中的砷浓度范围为0.13至0.48 mg g-1,呋塞米和磺胺嘧啶样品中的砷浓度分别为0.49和0.54 mg g-1。使用DSS-GF原子吸收光谱法不需要预先消化样品,可以直接在固体样品中测定砷,具有污染风险低、分析物损失小、准确性好、定量限制等优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FEASIBILITY OF DIRECT SOLID SAMPLING FOR ARSENIC DETERMINATION IN SULFUR-CONTAINING ACTIVE PHARMACEUTICAL INGREDIENTS BY GF AAS
A method for As determination in sulfur-containing active pharmaceutical ingredients (SC-APIs) by direct solid sampling graphite furnace atomic absorption (DSS-GF AAS) was developed. The proposed method was successfully applied to three SC-APIs (hydrochlorothiazide, furosemide and sulfadiazine). Palladium was used as chemical modifier as well as hydrogen during the pyrolysis allowing the direct determination of As in the SC-APIs without interferences caused by gaseous sulfur species. Sample masses (hydrochlorothiazide) from 0.4 to 3 mg were used and calibration with aqueous standard solutions was feasible. The limit of quantification was 0.033 mg g-1 and the calibration ranged from 0.1 to 1.6 ng As. Recoveries for As solutions added directly to the solid samples were between 95 and 103%, showing a good accuracy. The method validation highlighted its robustness, since variation in pyrolysis and atomization temperatures, as well as in Pd and sample masses, did not change significantly the results. Additional experiments showed that this method can be applied to other SC-APIs (as e.g., furosemide and sulfadiazine). Arsenic concentration in hydrochlorothiazide samples ranged from 0.13 to 0.48 mg g-1, while in furosemide and sulfadiazine samples it was from 0.49 and 0.54 mg g-1, respectively. The use of DSS-GF AAS does not require previous sample digestion and As could be directly determined in the solid samples providing some advantages, as lower risks of contamination and analyte losses, good accuracy and limits of quantification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantitative analysis of pharmaceutical products by spectrophotometry in the infrared region: a practical review Quality evaluation of solid pharmaceutical preparations for veterinary use containing cephalexin Anti-Candida activity of terpenes from Salvia ovalifolia, S. procurrens and S. uliginosa, native to South Brazil Stability-indicating RP-HPLC method applied to the quantification of anti-histaminic drug ebastine in its oral suspension dosage form Development and validation of UV Spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of Efonidipine hydrochloride ethanolate and Chlorthalidone in their synthetic mixture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1