21世纪在三宝垄MI - sensei的积极学习分析

Kristi Liani Purwanti, Zuaninta Adriyani, Ega Fatmawati
{"title":"21世纪在三宝垄MI - sensei的积极学习分析","authors":"Kristi Liani Purwanti, Zuaninta Adriyani, Ega Fatmawati","doi":"10.31602/muallimuna.v8i1.5906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the implementation of 21st century skills-based active learning at partner MI of UIN Walisongo Semarang after obtaining training and mentoring since 2018. This study is a qualitative field research with fourth grade teachers at partner MI of UIN Walisongo Semarang as the subjects. The partner MI of UIN Walisongo are MI Nashrul Fajar, MI Taufiqiyah, MI Tarbiyatul Khairat, MI Al Khoirriyah 02 and MI Al Hikmah. Data collection techniques were carried out through an observation of the learning process, the documentation of reviewing the lesson plan and worksheets as well as interviews. Data analysis in this study consists of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The conclusion shows that critical thinking indicators are not distinguishable in the lesson plan as the teacher has not given students the opportunity to explain their mind in their own language. The indicators of collaboration and communication have not been implemented optimally in the learning process. This is because it is not possible to have discussions or close interactions during the pandemic, students were keeping their distance from each other while paying attention to health protocols. In addition, the majority of communication indicators that are implemented tend to be the results of individual work, not the results of discussions. The submission of the learning conclusions is more likely to be delivered by the teacher at the end of the learning process, not delivered by students directly. Indicators of creativity and critical thinking have not been appeared optimally in the worksheets. In the worksheets, the teacher has not given the freedom for students to determine how to complete the task and has not provided the assignments that require students' creativity. Questions given by teachers mostly only require students to repeat the ideas or material from the teacher rather than producing students' own ideas.","PeriodicalId":18944,"journal":{"name":"Muallimuna : Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS PEMBELAJARAN AKTIF BERBASIS KETERAMPILAN ABAD 21 PADA GURU MI DI KOTA SEMARANG\",\"authors\":\"Kristi Liani Purwanti, Zuaninta Adriyani, Ega Fatmawati\",\"doi\":\"10.31602/muallimuna.v8i1.5906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to analyze the implementation of 21st century skills-based active learning at partner MI of UIN Walisongo Semarang after obtaining training and mentoring since 2018. This study is a qualitative field research with fourth grade teachers at partner MI of UIN Walisongo Semarang as the subjects. The partner MI of UIN Walisongo are MI Nashrul Fajar, MI Taufiqiyah, MI Tarbiyatul Khairat, MI Al Khoirriyah 02 and MI Al Hikmah. Data collection techniques were carried out through an observation of the learning process, the documentation of reviewing the lesson plan and worksheets as well as interviews. Data analysis in this study consists of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The conclusion shows that critical thinking indicators are not distinguishable in the lesson plan as the teacher has not given students the opportunity to explain their mind in their own language. The indicators of collaboration and communication have not been implemented optimally in the learning process. This is because it is not possible to have discussions or close interactions during the pandemic, students were keeping their distance from each other while paying attention to health protocols. In addition, the majority of communication indicators that are implemented tend to be the results of individual work, not the results of discussions. The submission of the learning conclusions is more likely to be delivered by the teacher at the end of the learning process, not delivered by students directly. Indicators of creativity and critical thinking have not been appeared optimally in the worksheets. In the worksheets, the teacher has not given the freedom for students to determine how to complete the task and has not provided the assignments that require students' creativity. Questions given by teachers mostly only require students to repeat the ideas or material from the teacher rather than producing students' own ideas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Muallimuna : Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Muallimuna : Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31602/muallimuna.v8i1.5906\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muallimuna : Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31602/muallimuna.v8i1.5906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在分析自2018年以来,UIN Walisongo三宝朗合作伙伴MI在接受培训和指导后,21世纪技能为基础的主动学习的实施情况。本研究是一项定性的实地研究,以unin Walisongo Semarang的合作伙伴MI的四年级教师为研究对象。unin Walisongo的合作伙伴是Nashrul Fajar、Taufiqiyah、Tarbiyatul Khairat、Al Khoirriyah 02和Al Hikmah。数据收集技术是通过对学习过程的观察、审查课程计划和工作表的记录以及访谈来进行的。本研究的数据分析包括数据还原、数据呈现和得出结论。结论表明,由于教师没有给学生机会用自己的语言解释自己的想法,因此在教案中无法区分批判性思维指标。在学习过程中,协作和沟通的指标没有得到最佳的实施。这是因为在大流行期间不可能进行讨论或密切互动,学生们在注意卫生规程的同时彼此保持距离。此外,实施的大多数沟通指标往往是个人工作的结果,而不是讨论的结果。学习结论的提交更有可能由教师在学习过程结束时提交,而不是由学生直接提交。创造力和批判性思维的指标并没有在工作表中得到最佳体现。在工作表中,老师没有给学生自由决定如何完成任务,也没有提供需要学生创造力的作业。老师提出的问题大多只要求学生重复老师的想法或材料,而不是产生学生自己的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANALISIS PEMBELAJARAN AKTIF BERBASIS KETERAMPILAN ABAD 21 PADA GURU MI DI KOTA SEMARANG
This study aims to analyze the implementation of 21st century skills-based active learning at partner MI of UIN Walisongo Semarang after obtaining training and mentoring since 2018. This study is a qualitative field research with fourth grade teachers at partner MI of UIN Walisongo Semarang as the subjects. The partner MI of UIN Walisongo are MI Nashrul Fajar, MI Taufiqiyah, MI Tarbiyatul Khairat, MI Al Khoirriyah 02 and MI Al Hikmah. Data collection techniques were carried out through an observation of the learning process, the documentation of reviewing the lesson plan and worksheets as well as interviews. Data analysis in this study consists of data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The conclusion shows that critical thinking indicators are not distinguishable in the lesson plan as the teacher has not given students the opportunity to explain their mind in their own language. The indicators of collaboration and communication have not been implemented optimally in the learning process. This is because it is not possible to have discussions or close interactions during the pandemic, students were keeping their distance from each other while paying attention to health protocols. In addition, the majority of communication indicators that are implemented tend to be the results of individual work, not the results of discussions. The submission of the learning conclusions is more likely to be delivered by the teacher at the end of the learning process, not delivered by students directly. Indicators of creativity and critical thinking have not been appeared optimally in the worksheets. In the worksheets, the teacher has not given the freedom for students to determine how to complete the task and has not provided the assignments that require students' creativity. Questions given by teachers mostly only require students to repeat the ideas or material from the teacher rather than producing students' own ideas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PENGEMBANGAN KOMIK EDUKASI BERBASIS CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING BERBANTUAN KVISOFT FLIPBOOK MAKER PRO UNTUK SEKOLAH DASAR PENGEMBANGAN MEDIA INTERAKTIF SIPEDA SISTEM PEREDARAN DARAH MANUSIA UNTUK MENINGKATKAN BERPIKIR KRITIS KONTRIBUSI LITERASI DIGITAL DAN INTERAKSI BELAJAR ANTAR SISWA TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN MEMECAHKAN MASALAH PEMBELAJARAN IPAS OPTIMALISASI KREATIVITASOPTIMALISASI KREATIVITAS SISWA BERBASIS PROGRAM SEKOLAH ADIWIYATA DI SEKOLAH DASAR SISWA BERBASIS PROGRAM SEKOLAH ADIWIYATA DI SEKOLAH DASAR ANALISIS MODEL PROJECT BASED LEARNING BERBANTUAN LIVEWORKSHEETS DALAM MENINGKATKAN PRESTASI BELAJAR DAN KETERAMPILAN LITERASI SAINS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1