使用视觉设计专业知识来表征二维科学可视化方法的有效性

D. Feliz, D. Laidlaw, Fritz Drury
{"title":"使用视觉设计专业知识来表征二维科学可视化方法的有效性","authors":"D. Feliz, D. Laidlaw, Fritz Drury","doi":"10.1109/VIS.2005.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Figure 1: Eleven different visualization methods that represent the same continuous scalar dataset. We are characterizing the effectiveness of each one of these methods, both individually and in combination, to represent scalar datasets in 2D. We present the results from a pilot study that evaluates the effectiveness of 2D visualization methods in terms of a set of design factors, which are subjectively rated by expert visual designers. In collaboration with educators from the Illustration Department at the Rhode Island School of Design (RISD), we have defined a space of visualization methods using basic visual elements including icon hue, icon size, icon density, and background saturation (see Figure 1). In this initial pilot study we presented our subjects with single variable visualization methods. The results characterize the effectiveness of individual visual elements according to our design factors. We are beginning to test these results by creating two-variable visualizations and studying how the different visual elements interact. 1 INTRODUCTION Given the increasing capacity of scientists to acquire or calculate multival-ued datasets, creating effective visualizations for understanding and correlating these data is imperative. However, modeling the space of possible vi-sualization methods for a given scientific problem has challenged computer scientists, statisticians, and cognitive scientists for many years [1,2,3,4]; it is still an open challenge. Our goal is to provide scientists with visualization methods that convey information by optimizing the design of the images to facilitate perception and comprehension. We created a framework for evaluating these visualization methods through feedback from expert visual designers and art educators. Our framework mimics the art education process, in which art educators impart artistic and visual design knowledge to their students through critiques of the students' work.We established a set of factors that characterize the effectiveness of a visualization method in displaying scientific data. These factors include constraints implied by the dataset, such as the relative importance of the different data variables or the minimum feature size present in the data. We also include design, artistic, and perceptual factors, such as time required to understand the visualization, or how visually linear is the mapping between data and visual element across the image. We will describe these in detail in section 2. Evaluating the effectiveness of visualizations is difficult because tests to evaluate them meaningfully are hard to design and execute [5]. We have researched this issue previously in two user studies comparing 2D vector visualization methods. The first …","PeriodicalId":91181,"journal":{"name":"Visualization : proceedings of the ... IEEE Conference on Visualization. IEEE Conference on Visualization","volume":"9 1","pages":"101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Visual Design Expertise to Characterize the Effectiveness of 2D Scientific Visualization Methods\",\"authors\":\"D. Feliz, D. Laidlaw, Fritz Drury\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VIS.2005.109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Figure 1: Eleven different visualization methods that represent the same continuous scalar dataset. We are characterizing the effectiveness of each one of these methods, both individually and in combination, to represent scalar datasets in 2D. We present the results from a pilot study that evaluates the effectiveness of 2D visualization methods in terms of a set of design factors, which are subjectively rated by expert visual designers. In collaboration with educators from the Illustration Department at the Rhode Island School of Design (RISD), we have defined a space of visualization methods using basic visual elements including icon hue, icon size, icon density, and background saturation (see Figure 1). In this initial pilot study we presented our subjects with single variable visualization methods. The results characterize the effectiveness of individual visual elements according to our design factors. We are beginning to test these results by creating two-variable visualizations and studying how the different visual elements interact. 1 INTRODUCTION Given the increasing capacity of scientists to acquire or calculate multival-ued datasets, creating effective visualizations for understanding and correlating these data is imperative. However, modeling the space of possible vi-sualization methods for a given scientific problem has challenged computer scientists, statisticians, and cognitive scientists for many years [1,2,3,4]; it is still an open challenge. Our goal is to provide scientists with visualization methods that convey information by optimizing the design of the images to facilitate perception and comprehension. We created a framework for evaluating these visualization methods through feedback from expert visual designers and art educators. Our framework mimics the art education process, in which art educators impart artistic and visual design knowledge to their students through critiques of the students' work.We established a set of factors that characterize the effectiveness of a visualization method in displaying scientific data. These factors include constraints implied by the dataset, such as the relative importance of the different data variables or the minimum feature size present in the data. We also include design, artistic, and perceptual factors, such as time required to understand the visualization, or how visually linear is the mapping between data and visual element across the image. We will describe these in detail in section 2. Evaluating the effectiveness of visualizations is difficult because tests to evaluate them meaningfully are hard to design and execute [5]. We have researched this issue previously in two user studies comparing 2D vector visualization methods. The first …\",\"PeriodicalId\":91181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visualization : proceedings of the ... IEEE Conference on Visualization. IEEE Conference on Visualization\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visualization : proceedings of the ... IEEE Conference on Visualization. IEEE Conference on Visualization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VIS.2005.109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visualization : proceedings of the ... IEEE Conference on Visualization. IEEE Conference on Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VIS.2005.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

图1:表示相同连续标量数据集的11种不同的可视化方法。我们正在描述这些方法中的每一种的有效性,无论是单独的还是组合的,都可以在2D中表示标量数据集。我们展示了一项试点研究的结果,该研究从一组设计因素的角度评估了2D可视化方法的有效性,这些因素由专业视觉设计师主观评定。与罗德岛设计学院(RISD)插图系的教育工作者合作,我们使用基本的视觉元素(包括图标色调、图标大小、图标密度和背景饱和度)定义了一个可视化方法空间(见图1)。在这个最初的试点研究中,我们向我们的受试者提供了单变量可视化方法。根据我们的设计因素,结果表征了单个视觉元素的有效性。我们开始通过创建双变量可视化来测试这些结果,并研究不同的视觉元素如何相互作用。鉴于科学家获取或计算多用途数据集的能力日益增强,创建有效的可视化来理解和关联这些数据是必要的。然而,为给定的科学问题建模可能的可视化方法空间多年来一直挑战着计算机科学家、统计学家和认知科学家[1,2,3,4];这仍然是一个公开的挑战。我们的目标是为科学家提供可视化方法,通过优化图像设计来传达信息,以促进感知和理解。我们创建了一个框架,通过专家视觉设计师和艺术教育家的反馈来评估这些可视化方法。我们的框架模仿了艺术教育的过程,在这个过程中,艺术教育者通过对学生作品的评论向学生传授艺术和视觉设计知识。我们建立了一组因素,以表征可视化方法在显示科学数据方面的有效性。这些因素包括数据集隐含的约束,例如不同数据变量的相对重要性或数据中存在的最小特征大小。我们还包括设计、艺术和感知因素,例如理解可视化所需的时间,或者数据和视觉元素之间的映射在图像上的视觉线性程度。我们将在第2节中详细描述这些。评估可视化的有效性是困难的,因为有意义地评估它们的测试很难设计和执行[5]。我们之前在两个比较二维矢量可视化方法的用户研究中研究了这个问题。第一个……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Visual Design Expertise to Characterize the Effectiveness of 2D Scientific Visualization Methods
Figure 1: Eleven different visualization methods that represent the same continuous scalar dataset. We are characterizing the effectiveness of each one of these methods, both individually and in combination, to represent scalar datasets in 2D. We present the results from a pilot study that evaluates the effectiveness of 2D visualization methods in terms of a set of design factors, which are subjectively rated by expert visual designers. In collaboration with educators from the Illustration Department at the Rhode Island School of Design (RISD), we have defined a space of visualization methods using basic visual elements including icon hue, icon size, icon density, and background saturation (see Figure 1). In this initial pilot study we presented our subjects with single variable visualization methods. The results characterize the effectiveness of individual visual elements according to our design factors. We are beginning to test these results by creating two-variable visualizations and studying how the different visual elements interact. 1 INTRODUCTION Given the increasing capacity of scientists to acquire or calculate multival-ued datasets, creating effective visualizations for understanding and correlating these data is imperative. However, modeling the space of possible vi-sualization methods for a given scientific problem has challenged computer scientists, statisticians, and cognitive scientists for many years [1,2,3,4]; it is still an open challenge. Our goal is to provide scientists with visualization methods that convey information by optimizing the design of the images to facilitate perception and comprehension. We created a framework for evaluating these visualization methods through feedback from expert visual designers and art educators. Our framework mimics the art education process, in which art educators impart artistic and visual design knowledge to their students through critiques of the students' work.We established a set of factors that characterize the effectiveness of a visualization method in displaying scientific data. These factors include constraints implied by the dataset, such as the relative importance of the different data variables or the minimum feature size present in the data. We also include design, artistic, and perceptual factors, such as time required to understand the visualization, or how visually linear is the mapping between data and visual element across the image. We will describe these in detail in section 2. Evaluating the effectiveness of visualizations is difficult because tests to evaluate them meaningfully are hard to design and execute [5]. We have researched this issue previously in two user studies comparing 2D vector visualization methods. The first …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conformal Magnifier: A Focus+Context Technique with Minimal Distortion. Modified Dendrogram of High-dimensional Feature Space for Transfer Function Design. Illustrative Rendering Techniques for Visualization: Future of Visualization or Just Another Technique? The Visualization Process: The Path from Data to Insight Design and Evaluation in Visualization Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1