网络选择中优先MADM算法的比较研究

K. Anupama, S. Sri Gowri, B. Prabakara Rao
{"title":"网络选择中优先MADM算法的比较研究","authors":"K. Anupama, S. Sri Gowri, B. Prabakara Rao","doi":"10.1109/ICCMC.2018.8487931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A variety of Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) algorithms have been applied to the problem of network selection in a heterogeneous wireless environment. As each kind of MADM approach has its own strong and weak points, it is quite difficult to ensure which MADM algorithm is more appropriate for network selection. Moreover, from decision making perspective, an algorithm that can provide minor improvement in network selection accuracy is more preferable, rather than applying classical approaches prevailing from decades. In this context, this paper makes an attempt to identify the most suitable MADM method among the established outranking PROMETHEE and ELECTRE algorithms. The algorithms are tested in a heterogeneous environment with four overlapping networks and their performance is compared in terms of Network Selection Accuracy and Network Congestion. PROMETHEE algorithm produced beneficial results when compared to ELECTRE.","PeriodicalId":6604,"journal":{"name":"2018 Second International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC)","volume":"5 1 1","pages":"904-907"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Outranking MADM Algorithms in Network Selection\",\"authors\":\"K. Anupama, S. Sri Gowri, B. Prabakara Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCMC.2018.8487931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A variety of Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) algorithms have been applied to the problem of network selection in a heterogeneous wireless environment. As each kind of MADM approach has its own strong and weak points, it is quite difficult to ensure which MADM algorithm is more appropriate for network selection. Moreover, from decision making perspective, an algorithm that can provide minor improvement in network selection accuracy is more preferable, rather than applying classical approaches prevailing from decades. In this context, this paper makes an attempt to identify the most suitable MADM method among the established outranking PROMETHEE and ELECTRE algorithms. The algorithms are tested in a heterogeneous environment with four overlapping networks and their performance is compared in terms of Network Selection Accuracy and Network Congestion. PROMETHEE algorithm produced beneficial results when compared to ELECTRE.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 Second International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC)\",\"volume\":\"5 1 1\",\"pages\":\"904-907\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 Second International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCMC.2018.8487931\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Second International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCMC.2018.8487931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

多种多属性决策算法已被应用于异构无线环境下的网络选择问题。由于每种MADM方法都有其优缺点,因此很难确定哪种MADM算法更适合网络选择。此外,从决策的角度来看,一种能够在网络选择准确性方面提供微小改进的算法比应用几十年来流行的经典方法更可取。在此背景下,本文试图从现有的排名较高的PROMETHEE和ELECTRE算法中找出最适合的MADM方法。在具有四个重叠网络的异构环境中对算法进行了测试,并在网络选择精度和网络拥塞方面对算法性能进行了比较。与ELECTRE相比,PROMETHEE算法产生了有益的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Study of Outranking MADM Algorithms in Network Selection
A variety of Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) algorithms have been applied to the problem of network selection in a heterogeneous wireless environment. As each kind of MADM approach has its own strong and weak points, it is quite difficult to ensure which MADM algorithm is more appropriate for network selection. Moreover, from decision making perspective, an algorithm that can provide minor improvement in network selection accuracy is more preferable, rather than applying classical approaches prevailing from decades. In this context, this paper makes an attempt to identify the most suitable MADM method among the established outranking PROMETHEE and ELECTRE algorithms. The algorithms are tested in a heterogeneous environment with four overlapping networks and their performance is compared in terms of Network Selection Accuracy and Network Congestion. PROMETHEE algorithm produced beneficial results when compared to ELECTRE.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modelling of Audio Effects for Vocal and Music Synthesis in Real Time Deep Learning Framework for Diabetic Retinopathy Diagnosis A Comprehensive Survey on Internet of Things Based Healthcare Services and its Applications Exploring Pain Insensitivity Inducing Gene ZFHX2 by using Deep Convolutional Neural Network Atmospheric Weather Prediction Using various machine learning Techniques: A Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1