基于响应面法和人工神经网络的碎屑岩储层饱和高度建模新方法

IF 2.6 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Upstream Oil and Gas Technology Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.upstre.2022.100081
Eric Thompson Brantson , Samuel Sibil , Harrison Osei , Esther Boateng Owusu , Botwe Takyi , Ebenezer Ansah
{"title":"基于响应面法和人工神经网络的碎屑岩储层饱和高度建模新方法","authors":"Eric Thompson Brantson ,&nbsp;Samuel Sibil ,&nbsp;Harrison Osei ,&nbsp;Esther Boateng Owusu ,&nbsp;Botwe Takyi ,&nbsp;Ebenezer Ansah","doi":"10.1016/j.upstre.2022.100081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Saturation Height Modelling (SHM) is an important reservoir characterization method for estimating the water saturation component which is a fraction of the total reservoir fluids in porous media. Although several methods have been used in calculating water saturation, little or no research has employed Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in predicting water saturation in field cores. In this paper, well datasets were tested with four conventional curve fitting models including Lambda, Thomeer, Leverette J, and Brooks-Corey of which Brook-Corey gave the best fit with an <em>R<sup>2</sup></em> of 0.485. The RSM with the Central Composite Design (CCD) was used to obtain the mathematical and statistical relationship between the predictors and target as well as the variables’ interactions optimization. The model was analysed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) which validated the correlations with an F-value of 4.96, a p-value less than 0.05, and a Lack of Fit-value of 0.76 implying that the model developed was statistically significant. The RSM model gave a better fit with an <em>R<sup>2</sup></em> value of 0.817 with mathematical links, almost twice that predicted by the conventional methods. Then, the testing performance of the RSM model was compared to the standard radial basis function neural network model (<em>R<sup>2</sup></em> of 0.9779). The results proved that both RSM and RBFNN models’ performance was accurate and reliable and could give a precise prediction of water saturation without any conventional curve fitting parameters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101264,"journal":{"name":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100081"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A new approach for saturation height modelling in a clastic reservoir using response surface methodology and artificial neural network\",\"authors\":\"Eric Thompson Brantson ,&nbsp;Samuel Sibil ,&nbsp;Harrison Osei ,&nbsp;Esther Boateng Owusu ,&nbsp;Botwe Takyi ,&nbsp;Ebenezer Ansah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.upstre.2022.100081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Saturation Height Modelling (SHM) is an important reservoir characterization method for estimating the water saturation component which is a fraction of the total reservoir fluids in porous media. Although several methods have been used in calculating water saturation, little or no research has employed Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in predicting water saturation in field cores. In this paper, well datasets were tested with four conventional curve fitting models including Lambda, Thomeer, Leverette J, and Brooks-Corey of which Brook-Corey gave the best fit with an <em>R<sup>2</sup></em> of 0.485. The RSM with the Central Composite Design (CCD) was used to obtain the mathematical and statistical relationship between the predictors and target as well as the variables’ interactions optimization. The model was analysed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) which validated the correlations with an F-value of 4.96, a p-value less than 0.05, and a Lack of Fit-value of 0.76 implying that the model developed was statistically significant. The RSM model gave a better fit with an <em>R<sup>2</sup></em> value of 0.817 with mathematical links, almost twice that predicted by the conventional methods. Then, the testing performance of the RSM model was compared to the standard radial basis function neural network model (<em>R<sup>2</sup></em> of 0.9779). The results proved that both RSM and RBFNN models’ performance was accurate and reliable and could give a precise prediction of water saturation without any conventional curve fitting parameters.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100081\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260422000196\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260422000196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

饱和高度模拟(SHM)是一种重要的储层表征方法,用于估计孔隙介质中占储层流体总量的一部分的含水饱和度。虽然已有几种计算含水饱和度的方法,但利用响应面法预测现场岩心含水饱和度的研究很少或没有。本文采用Lambda、Thomeer、Leverette J和Brooks-Corey四种常规曲线拟合模型对井数据集进行了测试,其中Brooks-Corey拟合最佳,R2为0.485。采用中心组合设计(CCD)的RSM,得到预测因子与目标因子之间的数学统计关系以及变量间的交互优化。使用方差分析(ANOVA)对模型进行分析,验证了f值为4.96,p值小于0.05,缺乏拟合值为0.76,这意味着模型开发具有统计学意义。RSM模型具有较好的拟合效果,具有数学联系的R2值为0.817,几乎是传统方法预测结果的两倍。然后,将RSM模型与标准径向基函数神经网络模型的测试性能进行比较(R2为0.9779)。结果表明,RSM和RBFNN模型均能准确可靠地预测含水饱和度,无需任何常规的曲线拟合参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A new approach for saturation height modelling in a clastic reservoir using response surface methodology and artificial neural network

Saturation Height Modelling (SHM) is an important reservoir characterization method for estimating the water saturation component which is a fraction of the total reservoir fluids in porous media. Although several methods have been used in calculating water saturation, little or no research has employed Response Surface Methodology (RSM) in predicting water saturation in field cores. In this paper, well datasets were tested with four conventional curve fitting models including Lambda, Thomeer, Leverette J, and Brooks-Corey of which Brook-Corey gave the best fit with an R2 of 0.485. The RSM with the Central Composite Design (CCD) was used to obtain the mathematical and statistical relationship between the predictors and target as well as the variables’ interactions optimization. The model was analysed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) which validated the correlations with an F-value of 4.96, a p-value less than 0.05, and a Lack of Fit-value of 0.76 implying that the model developed was statistically significant. The RSM model gave a better fit with an R2 value of 0.817 with mathematical links, almost twice that predicted by the conventional methods. Then, the testing performance of the RSM model was compared to the standard radial basis function neural network model (R2 of 0.9779). The results proved that both RSM and RBFNN models’ performance was accurate and reliable and could give a precise prediction of water saturation without any conventional curve fitting parameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamics of pump jacks with theories and experiments Well perforating—More than reservoir connection A new method for predicting casing wear in highly deviated wells using mud logging data Experimental investigation of bypassed-oil recovery in tight reservoir rock using a two-step CO2 soaking strategy: Effects of fracture geometry A Review of Modern Approaches of Digitalization in Oil and Gas Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1